mandalorian2298 wrote:Talapus wrote:mandalorian2298 wrote:You can consider this Mandy-rant lite...
Really??? I guess then I need a subscription for the fat free/gluten free version next time because it is still wordy. Will look this over in a bit when I have more time from working to give it the attention you no doubt expect it to deserve.

It does deserve it! How many days does it take fo you to read one brilliant post and then sing praises to the author?! Sing my praises already, damn your ovaries! Sing them! SING!!!

I missed the brilliance...sorry dude. See the logic and reasoning behind it and no doubt with epi's response you will regale us with a full page tale of treachery and deceit and some how wrap it up all nicely in a CONCISE SUMMARY
*nudge, nudge, wink wink* for me to read later...lol.
Couple things I guess. First off, the mason talk is ridiculous. Thank you captain obvious for opening the door on mason talk. You are playing a game based on what quite frankly could have caused complete instability in middle east for all the nations on the plant. Sure they have had problems for centuries but every flipping person on the planet thinks they know how to deal with it. With that in mind you have zero idea what nations, special interest groups, government contractors, religious solo fanatics, or other political groups with motives can communicate in this game. Reaching out like that seems useless as I'm sure as the game progresses alliances and needs will change based on the story and thus some form of communication will happen. So discussing this before we know anything is a total waste of time.
I see the Dak conversation as having slightly more to go on then the epi convo at the moment, but that's also because I have yet to read epi's response as I am just summing up so far as I catch up.
As for TWR I'm seeing more than anything a player who has been screwed in the past either from action or non-action and is too afraid to say much else on grounds it will hurt them. It's day 1, I'm willing to cut them a bit a slack and see how this plays out.
Also I agree with Ragain, mass claims make sense in some setups and games and just because you got screwed in one game pt never means mass claims are bad. They can be quite beneficial in certain setups though I believe this to not be one of them just based on the fact that for several of our roles it could be hard to decide alignment.
Back the twr...I mean really what were you thinking coming out claiming town will miss you later on if they need to analyse something....really? Even if you live through the day I would think that kind of puts a bright neon arrow over your head saying, "Hey bad guys, I know stuff and I'm gonna tell." I wish you all the luck in the world still being alive come day 3 with comments like that.
And I read Epi's response...ehhh. not enough to sway me and think Epi is clean but not enough to make me think mandy is scum either(Though usually buddy I think that just to be safe).
So to sum up, lot's of day 1 shenanigans and best thing so far is the dak argument which although isn't strong is something. I doubt twr will live long, mason talk is complete bs so early in the game, BU's list already has 5 scum based on gut(You are correct, not useful because that seems slightly high and again alliances I'm sure will change as game goes on), and no doubt we will get a one page rebuttal from mandy based on epi's response(Remember dude, cliff notes at bottom please). With the weekend ahead of us and more discussion to come I will quite simply just not move my vote out of respect for the mod until we get closer to deadline.