Moderator: Community Team
StorrZerg wrote: i find no joy in this
Thanks for the notice, IB. It would have been nice if you had accompanied it with an appropriate clip, likeIron Butterfly wrote:Vote Tobikura
Because I have never played with him and I have nothing pithy to say of him.

Mods get no slack for spelling names wrong...it's TobikeraLSU Tiger Josh wrote:Vote Count: 15 alive takes 8 to lynch.
2 BgtheBrain: PTLowe, Mandy,
2 JBFloyd: Epitaph, Talapus,
1 Tobikura: Iron Butterfly,
1 The White Rose: Bujaber,
1 Mandy: MadMitch,
1 Bujaber: Hotshot,
1 Winston: Ragian,

What an OMGUS post lol....... looks like you want to visit Allah sooner than me.madmitch wrote:@ Dakky, I am not sure how to react to your confusing comment, except to say that 's what a terrorist would say to try to get the suspicion of himself. so I hope you are not counting on a thousand virgins waiting for you when we finally send you to Allah. UNVOTE VOTE DAKKY
There was no logic to my first vote. It was just to bug BG (a joke vote). So I don't see how I didn't follow through with some logic I had started. I didn't vote BG because he is loud our quiet. All I had done was mention that talking D1 doesn't get you in trouble (BG's stated reason for clamming up D1) but often we run out of ideas really quickly and just go for who talks least.Talapus wrote:I don't think that all on day one, unless something shines forth and merits a case. Later on in game than sure. But as you can see from the high quality posts I have so far you will see I'm not out to build any case Quite honestly I voted you because you used your own logic to cast a vote, but only followed through with half of your logic as another vote wasn't brought forth. So, best thing I've seen so far and thus you have my attention.jbfloyd wrote:
Talapus puts me in a catch-22. I wasn't really intending to build a case on anyone at this point, but Talapus seems to think that if you're posting and not building a case (or something) then it's your turn in the corner.
However if someone in here pushes the awesomeness of Bush, freedom fries, and declares repeatedly why the USA is so star spangled awesome then they would probably get my vote at this point because I think they are trying too hard and hiding something.
That's you queue there mandy...lol
Well, between my voting 'one of the better Town players' and my FOSing TWR because I am naive enough to think that he might give himself away by making such a comment, I can hardly blame you.Epitaph1 wrote:I agree with Rag's comment about dakky. Adding up the posts at this point in the game isn't helpful as most of the talk has been joking around. It's only turning serious on page 4.
I took BuJaber's comment about masons to be a joke. LSU did mention masons in the rules, but that could mean nothing. Would be crazy if Bu was scum and one of his buddies is a scum mason.
The FOS and vote on TWR are both weak. Scum usually doesn't come out and say "I'm going to be quiet so I don't get lynched today." Yeah, it's not good to make such a comment as it doesn't contribute to the discussion, but I don't think TWR just gave himself away by making such a comment.
IGMEOY mandalorian and bujaber

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
So your logic is what with Mitch? What mistake did Mitch make if he is indeed an "evildoer"?dakky21 wrote:I agree with Epi and Rag about me not helping town, but at this moment I can only stick to the post count as scum almost always tends to be silent, especially on D1. Unfortunately no one voted for a mod or Arnold Schwarzenegger so I can stick to that and no one made any obvious mistake so far. Except mitch, who didn't react to my joke vote on him as he normally reacts. Only after I asked why didn't he react, then he wrote something, expecting to be funny as always, but this time I think he may not be town. So my vote on him stands.


Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
Mitch didn't react to my joke vote as he ordinary does. Nuff said. I'm just provoking to see how will all of you react, that's just meta since we played a lot of games together. So far I'd say your attack on me was good, but I'd also say you're town.Iron Butterfly wrote:So your logic is what with Mitch? What mistake did Mitch make if he is indeed an "evildoer"?dakky21 wrote:I agree with Epi and Rag about me not helping town, but at this moment I can only stick to the post count as scum almost always tends to be silent, especially on D1. Unfortunately no one voted for a mod or Arnold Schwarzenegger so I can stick to that and no one made any obvious mistake so far. Except mitch, who didn't react to my joke vote on him as he normally reacts. Only after I asked why didn't he react, then he wrote something, expecting to be funny as always, but this time I think he may not be town. So my vote on him stands.
I find it interesting how you first agree you did not help Town and then add a resounding BUT after after it, Then throw in some self depreciating humor to magnify your past mistakes that got you lynched.

It was a joke vote but his response was different.Iron Butterfly wrote:So now your reaction to Mitch was a trap?
See, this is helpful! Granted it might be a tad subjective for others to follow, but a subtle change in meta is something you want on record. The votecount right after your post doesn't have you voting Mitch, though... What gives?dakky21 wrote:I agree with Epi and Rag about me not helping town, but at this moment I can only stick to the post count as scum almost always tends to be silent, especially on D1. Unfortunately no one voted for a mod or Arnold Schwarzenegger so I can stick to that and no one made any obvious mistake so far. Except mitch, who didn't react to my joke vote on him as he normally reacts. Only after I asked why didn't he react, then he wrote something, expecting to be funny as always, but this time I think he may not be town. So my vote on him stands.
If all town players could state something along those lines, too, while scum and what not refrain from doing it, we should have this game sorted really quickly.the white rose wrote:For the record, I am definitely pro town, so it is not me looking scummy that gets me votes, it is you guys who cannot read me and always think i am scum, sometimes you know i do get a town role.
but hey, don't let that stop you from lynching me if you really think i am scum


Mandy and Bu said they have some reads but haven't shared them. Let's hear them.BuJaber wrote:No way Mandy..I'm not doing the work for you. I have an initial list of potential allies, another for scummy personalities, and another for no clue.
I'm expecting some overlap so don't disappoint.
As of now my vote stands.
StorrZerg wrote: i find no joy in this

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
See, this particular sentence in the middle of your thread got my attention. First, what would town have from lynching the inactive and second, why do you care about a mod? This was a pure scum play, as you want to lynch anyone, even an inactive. BIG FOS on you.jbfloyd wrote:Winston - Pretty sure he's not playing at this point. We could just lynch him so the mod doesn't have to worry about replacing him. Does that count as making the Mod happy?
This sounds like a post from a suicide bomber to me...the white rose wrote:lol, i was right, attracted 3 votes cos i simply said I am keeping quiet cos everytime i post i get lynched.
how is that scummy?
how about this, is this scummy?
I am scum so you had better vote me off now.
For the record, I am definitely pro town, so it is not me looking scummy that gets me votes, it is you guys who cannot read me and always think i am scum, sometimes you know i do get a town role.
but hey, don't let that stop you from lynching me if you really think i am scum
I agree with dakky here... wing is ready to sub in, no reason to lynch someone who is completely absent.dakky21 wrote:See, this particular sentence in the middle of your thread got my attention. First, what would town have from lynching the inactive and second, why do you care about a mod? This was a pure scum play, as you want to lynch anyone, even an inactive. BIG FOS on you.jbfloyd wrote:Winston - Pretty sure he's not playing at this point. We could just lynch him so the mod doesn't have to worry about replacing him. Does that count as making the Mod happy?