HOT + SEXY + nsfw

[Symmetry]

[mrswdk]

image removed

[mrswdk]

image removed.

[tkr4lf]

wtf?

[Symmetry]

[Bernie Sanders]

Go away symm and make your own thread on boys.
Washing off this thread, with a deep cleaning!

[warmonger1981]

Symmetry......... You make my penis soft.

[Symmetry]

Did I make it right?

[GabonX]

I'm not sure Gabon should be allowed within 500 feet of a school.

-TG

Why? All the people in those pics seem to be adults.

The first pic looks like a high school cheerleading troupe.

-TG

I'm not sure Gabon should be allowed within 500 feet of a school.

-TG

In the pic of the group of blondes, the one on the back of the other is maybe 13 or 14. Gabon is a pervert.

Their current age has nothing to do with the thread. The thread is titled HOT + SEXY + nsfw. Pictures of 13 year olds have no place in this thread regardless of their current ages.

Gabon is a pervert and should be reprimanded and castrated. Lock up your under 16 kids.

I've deleted a post due to a report. I don't read this tasteless thread, but if there are any more reports of underage children being posted in here as "sexy," I am going to recommend to admins that something be done about that person. Posting what are clearly 14-16 year old schoolgirls here is leaning toward paedophelia. Have a nice day.

I leave this thread for a couple days and come back to this? You guys are all nuts. Had I known these girls were under 18, which I don't believe they were and which none of you has shown to be the case, I wouldn't have posted them.The truth is the girls were most likely between the ages of 18 and 23 and were selected for their blonde hair and similar Nordic features in a group photo.

I googled Norwegian girls and Norwegian blondes and found pictures with a group, duo and a single girls in the shot, just like I did in the post right after it. I don't know about the background behind the Asian pop girl band either, I just wanted to find a shot with a group of Asian women. Shaming me for posting the results here, which were obviously of sexually mature women, by claiming that they're not undercuts the the tenants of truth, beauty and justice, the values we hold dear and that this thread was created to uphold...


I submit that none of you knows what an 18 year old female looks like. That's not just because it's impossible to differentiate where between the ages of 16 and 26 a girl is just by looking at her because sexual development varies from individual to individual, but because a great many women who have reached the legal age of adulthood look younger than the vast majority of women in this thread, indicating a preference for unnatural looking women by some of you here.

For example:

These are 18 year olds:







These are 19 year olds:







These are 23 year olds:






And these are 29 year olds:






These are both pictures of Ariana Grande. In the first she's 16 and in the second she's 22. If you're honest you'll admit there's not a whole lot of difference between them.







Look, I get it. Some of you are past your sexual prime and have little to no chance of having a sexual relationship with an attractive woman between the ages of 18 and 32 (without paying for it) ever again, or you're a woman past your peak attractiveness who realizes that you'll never again be given the praise and attention you once were for your now diminished beauty. Others may just be butt hurt because I said something mean to them in another thread and want to disingenuously take it out on me here, however foolishly misguided and inappropriate these groundless attacks have proven to be, but the fact is none of you has the ability to know exactly how old a woman is just by looking at her. You all need to stop judging women by their bodies...

A great deal of what you use to guess a woman's age is based on unnatural enhancements in the form of cleavage enhancing tops, makeup, tattoos, and piercings, most of which I'm turned off by. The Norwegian blondes in the removed photos could stand next to any of the above women and not look out of place in terms of age, again because women between the ages of 16 and 26, and some slightly older and some slightly younger, can basically look the same depending on where their hormones and life experiences have placed them. I would post the original shot but a misguided moderator has removed it and I'm not trying to antagonize her.

In conclusion I'll just say that I find it sad how some of you can't appreciate a group of Norwegian college students in their gymnast attire consisting of Leotards, Yoga pants, and the natural beauty God gave them, without driving yourselves mad with self loathing guilt and projecting your weird perversions onto the person who posted them.

Truly it is a sad state of affairs we find ourselves in.

[GabonX]

For the record, I don't find all of the women in the above post attractive. Rather they were put there to illustrate how silly it is to try and guess someone's age just by looking at them.

[Symmetry]

For the record, I don't find all of the women in the above post attractive. Rather they were put there to illustrate how silly it is to try and guess someone's age just by looking at them.

"For the record"

I gotta ask, did your lawyers get you off of calling door to door?

[GabonX]

For the record, I don't find all of the women in the above post attractive. Rather they were put there to illustrate how silly it is to try and guess someone's age just by looking at them.

"For the record"

I gotta ask, did your lawyers get you off of calling door to door?

Classic Symmetry, being a chode. Seriously dude, I make the point that every one posted above is 18 or over, ranging from 18 to 29, and you can't help yourself but to ignore it and make some snide bs comment. That's after you posted your homoerotic images here for the umpteenth time even though you know nobody wants it, you've stated in the past you'd stop, and there are threads made specifically for that purpose.

There's a reason nobody here likes you.

[Symmetry]

For the record, I don't find all of the women in the above post attractive. Rather they were put there to illustrate how silly it is to try and guess someone's age just by looking at them.

"For the record"

I gotta ask, did your lawyers get you off of calling door to door?

Classic Symmetry, being a chode. Seriously dude, I make the point that every one posted above is 18 or over, ranging from 18 to 29, and you can't help yourself but to ignore it and make some snide bs comment. That's after you posted your homoerotic images here for the umpteenth time even though you know nobody wants it, you've stated in the past you'd stop, and there are threads made specifically for that purpose.

There's a reason nobody here likes you.

What do you do with your under-18:images? I think that's the question people will find creepy, that and your careful "barely legal" threshold.

That tends to be creep level stuff. Wheras most blokes can look as Ali winning a fight and not really care, you're double checking the birthdays of your kids,

[GabonX]

Whatever you say dude. In all seriousness though, what's with you using the word "creepy" so much? "Creepy" is what women say when they're not smart enough to articulate what they don't like about a man. It's not a word that an intelligent self respecting man would use.

[TA1LGUNN3R]

Go away symm and make your own thread on boys.
Washing off this thread, with a deep cleaning!

Classic! What a great movie.

"Oh she knows exactly what she's doin'."

Re: Gabby

I can generally tell the difference between 14 year olds and 18 year olds. I agree with ny2, that one girl riding piggyback was young, she still had a child's face. Ariana what's her face is an exception because she's like a midget or something. If you can't see the inappropriateness of posting a child, well, I don't know what to tell you.

-TG

[Symmetry]

Whatever you say dude. In all seriousness though, what's with you using the word "creepy" so much? "Creepy" is what women say when they're not smart enough to articulate what they don't like about a man. It's not a word that an intelligent self respecting man would use.

I ain't surprised that you've heard this from women primarily, indeed so often that you find it strange that a bloke has locked on to one of your charecteristics too.

What's really odd is that in spite of your creepiness, you somehow consider it a matter of manly conduct that it not be pointed out to you.

Creepy stuff

[GabonX]

Ariana what's her face is an exception because she's like a midget or something.

It's not uncommon and she's not the exception. That's why they have to card for cigarettes and access to bars. We could do a similar comparison with any number of other female celebrities that achieved fame in their youth that carried over to their 20s.

I can generally tell the difference between 14 year olds and 18 year olds. I agree with ny2, that one girl riding piggyback was young, she still had a child's face.

If you can't see the inappropriateness of posting a child, well, I don't know what to tell you.

For all of this talk from you guys, you're not actually showing anything to support your opinions. I'm not sure how much exposure you have to women between 18 and 23 but if this is how you see them, a lot of them would probably surprise you.

The difference between a 14 year old and an 18 year old is probably greater than between a 16 year old and a 20 year old or even a 16 year old and a 26 year old. Most women aren't developed by 14 but many are at 16. It doesn't mean that grown men should chase 16 year olds.

It's not that I don't see a moral difference in posting girls of an appropriate age and of those who are not. The point is there's nothing to indicate that any of them were under 18. Zip, nada, zilch. I litteraly had people in this thread advocating I be castrated and or executed for no reason. It's fucking sick...

I still think they were most likely in their early 20's but possibly late teens. I look at that picture and I see a college gymnast team, of which I've been I've been in the presence of in the last few months...

[mrswdk]

Why were my pictures deleted?

Will repost more once I'm posting from my laptop again. If Sym is allowed to fill this thread with men, I am allowed to post pictures of a girl's face.

[GabonX]

Whatever you say dude. In all seriousness though, what's with you using the word "creepy" so much? "Creepy" is what women say when they're not smart enough to articulate what they don't like about a man. It's not a word that an intelligent self respecting man would use.

I ain't surprised that you've heard this from women primarily, indeed so often that you find it strange that a bloke has locked on to one of your charecteristics too.

What's really odd is that in spite of your creepiness, you somehow consider it a matter of manly conduct that it not be pointed out to you.

Creepy stuff

Let's be real here. If you're a single guy trying to make sexy time happen, and you don't feel at least a little bit "creepy" going about it, you're probably doing something wrong.

You're still a chode that no one likes.

[Dukasaur]

For the record, I don't find all of the women in the above post attractive. Rather they were put there to illustrate how silly it is to try and guess someone's age just by looking at them.

It's not necessary to guess. If there's any doubt whatsoever, play it safe and don't post them.

Why were my pictures deleted?

Will repost more once I'm posting from my laptop again. If Sym is allowed to fill this thread with men, I am allowed to post pictures of a girl's face.

I would advise you not to do that.

You were very lucky that KA decided to let you go with a warning. Next time it will be a ban.

1. Posting a picture of someone who is obviously engaged in coitus is pornographic, even if the point of insertion is not shown.
2. The pained expression and the degrading logo attached to the picture clearly implied that it was some kind of abusive sex, possibly even non-consensual, which makes it the worst kind of exploitation porn.
3. The age of the model can't be stated with certainty, but she certainly looked under age, so it may have been criminally actionable.

Like I said, you were very lucky to get off with a warning. Don't push your luck.

[mrswdk]

Why were my pictures deleted?

Will repost more once I'm posting from my laptop again. If Sym is allowed to fill this thread with men, I am allowed to post pictures of a girl's face.

I would advise you not to do that.

You were very lucky that KA decided to let you go with a warning. Next time it will be a ban.

1. Posting a picture of someone who is obviously engaged in coitus is pornographic, even if the point of insertion is not shown.
2. The pained expression and the degrading logo attached to the picture clearly implied that it was some kind of abusive sex, possibly even non-consensual, which makes it the worst kind of exploitation porn.
3. The age of the model can't be stated with certainty, but she certainly looked under age, so it may have been criminally actionable.

Like I said, you were very lucky to get off with a warning. Don't push your luck.

Thank you for clarifying that any image posted in this thread must:

- Be of an adult woman, but not of some adult women
- Be pornographic, but not pornographic

I trust everyone else in this thread will start following these same guidelines.

[mrswdk]

Ayesha showing a dangerously titillating profile of her upper thigh. Girls gone wild - in the park!

[mrswdk]

Cor! This lucky photographer's got three pairs of eyes begging up at him at the same time. Someone grab the camcorder!

[mrswdk]

Looks like Salma's getting hot and sweaty on holiday. Hope she's having a blast!

[mrswdk]

Luckily the only thing that's smouldering about this lovely lady is her eyes. Don'tcha just love em!