You've been speaking to loki and cat I see.Dualta wrote:It's tighter than IAmCaffeine's knickers right now. Shaping up for a stormer of a final!
Moderator: Clan Directors
You've been speaking to loki and cat I see.Dualta wrote:It's tighter than IAmCaffeine's knickers right now. Shaping up for a stormer of a final!

No if we win by the smallest margin(60 games + tiebrakers) the second place will technicaly have to be shared by 3 clansbetiko wrote:If fallen wins this 31-30 again... Lulz! They would sure prove they are good under pressure!


It would have to be 31-29 or 34-33 because it's only 60 or 67 game match.betiko wrote:If fallen wins this 31-30 again... Lulz! They would sure prove they are good under pressure!
Yeah it's looking pretty close here!Dako wrote:No worries, we are slow cookers and have some wins coming in.

IcePack wrote:First blood!nolefan5311 wrote:Officially 1-0 as Rail Europe has Fallen!
Look guys, they aren't mythical creatures. They do in fact, bleed!
Dont worry Arma86n, we kept the carpet clean



Yeah, I generally have win / strong adv, leaning, neutral, leaning, strong adv / winning. So when i give these numbers its usually the win, strong, and leaning combined into a number and only leave out the full neutrals (and i dont mind putting something in leaning because it can always be changed if it alters) I dont wait until its totally locked down, cuz thats what I use strong for (to indicate very low chance of being turned at that point)rockfist wrote:That seems reasonable. I think I'm a little more reluctant to call games so my numbers are lower but the match is very close.

I've got the same basic ranking: Likely x, Lean x, Even, Lean y, Likely y. There is a lot of gray area between each of the categories in my mind though. It's not usually important in the likely/lean distinction, but between lean and even, I don't have a good objective, or even necessarily consistent, set of rules. I tend to be pretty subjective and go by feel. Bigger maps with larger teams and a 1-2 army deploy lead may end up listed as even for a while, unless that slight advantage remains for a couple rounds. The same lead in a small map with dubs teams might end up in the lean category a lot more quickly.IcePack wrote:Yeah, I generally have win / strong adv, leaning, neutral, leaning, strong adv / winning. So when i give these numbers its usually the win, strong, and leaning combined into a number and only leave out the full neutrals (and i dont mind putting something in leaning because it can always be changed if it alters) I dont wait until its totally locked down, cuz thats what I use strong for (to indicate very low chance of being turned at that point)rockfist wrote:That seems reasonable. I think I'm a little more reluctant to call games so my numbers are lower but the match is very close.


Sounds similar to me.Doc_Brown wrote:I've got the same basic ranking: Likely x, Lean x, Even, Lean y, Likely y. There is a lot of gray area between each of the categories in my mind though. It's not usually important in the likely/lean distinction, but between lean and even, I don't have a good objective, or even necessarily consistent, set of rules. I tend to be pretty subjective and go by feel. Bigger maps with larger teams and a 1-2 army deploy lead may end up listed as even for a while, unless that slight advantage remains for a couple rounds. The same lead in a small map with dubs teams might end up in the lean category a lot more quickly.IcePack wrote:Yeah, I generally have win / strong adv, leaning, neutral, leaning, strong adv / winning. So when i give these numbers its usually the win, strong, and leaning combined into a number and only leave out the full neutrals (and i dont mind putting something in leaning because it can always be changed if it alters) I dont wait until its totally locked down, cuz thats what I use strong for (to indicate very low chance of being turned at that point)rockfist wrote:That seems reasonable. I think I'm a little more reluctant to call games so my numbers are lower but the match is very close.










Ok sounds very similar to my #'s / info then. Plus just wanted someone to say something it's far to quiet for Finals!rockfist wrote:Can't speak for our clan. Speaking from my perspective it looks like its going to come down to three games unless a game is flipped (but I am assuming a lot to get to those numbers) and we will need to win two of three. At this point its more likely that a game or two will be flipped before the end than not, although many are all but over.


That was Dakorousseau72 wrote:WWII Ardennes has Fallen. I seem to remember someone saying we needed to win at least 20 to keep things interesting....
I wonder how he feels now
Dako wrote:Good luck there. Hope you can win at least 20 games otherwise it would bore our spectators out.


You guys haven't won 20 games just yet...rousseau72 wrote:WWII Ardennes has Fallen. I seem to remember someone saying we needed to win at least 20 to keep things interesting....
I wonder how he feels now

We're biting at your heels, so don't stop to bend over, or we might just bite you in the arseIcePack wrote:TOFU have any predictions here?

Someone needs to post in this sleepy threadrockfist wrote:Don't worry Doc, if they do I'm sure they won't keep quiet about it. They'll be quick to post about any wins they have.

WW2 Gazala has Fallen!Doc_Brown wrote:You guys haven't won 20 games just yet...rousseau72 wrote:WWII Ardennes has Fallen. I seem to remember someone saying we needed to win at least 20 to keep things interesting....
I wonder how he feels now