Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team




eddie2 wrote:Lol read placebo7,s interests
but, he is still not falling for a banana in the tail pipe...-Jésus noirplacebo7 wrote:Interests:The player with the less dignity in this game is judge_reinhold. He uses all cheap tactics you can imagine to win a game. He is so desperate for points that he could shell his mother to win...The most pathetic guy i\ve ever seen in net games..So sad

- How do you know I didn't pull out calculator,pen,pencil behind the ear?? You live with me<? Please tell me your best calculation Caff.? Or would You say if 3 way play was non existent the % of SD reports would be the same,,Or drop?? And if you say you don't care either way why then would you even post?,,Cuz that would be dumb? '')iAmCaffeine wrote:Really, 68%, lmao?! I mean, I know you didn't attempt at making any kind of calculation, but that's dumb.
We both know that figure is baseless.MagnusGreeol wrote:- How do you know I didn't pull out calculator,pen,pencil behind the ear?? You live with me<? Please tell me your best calculation Caff.? Or would You say if 3 way play was non existent the % of SD reports would be the same,,Or drop?? And if you say you don't care either way why then would you even post?,,Cuz that would be dumb? '')iAmCaffeine wrote:Really, 68%, lmao?! I mean, I know you didn't attempt at making any kind of calculation, but that's dumb.
-MGM-

- Caff.,, Its a good number, I think I'm within 10% + -,,,, Whatta ya want? Baseless or not, the % of SD reports go down without 3 way play, that friend is 100% guaranteed.iAmCaffeine wrote:MagnusGreeol wrote:- How do you know I didn't pull out calculator,pen,pencil behind the ear?? You live with me<? Please tell me your best calculation Caff.? Or would You say if 3 way play was non existent the % of SD reports would be the same,,Or drop?? And if you say you don't care either way why then would you even post?,,Cuz that would be dumb? '')iAmCaffeine wrote:Really, 68%, lmao?! I mean, I know you didn't attempt at making any kind of calculation, but that's dumb.
-MGM-
We both know that figure is baseless.

Whilst this is trueiAmCaffeine wrote:Sure. Let's just remove multiplayer games to completely and secret diplomacy will no longer be an issue. Team games and 1v1 only. Problem solved.
What part of no multiplayer don't you understand?clangfield wrote:Whilst this is trueiAmCaffeine wrote:Sure. Let's just remove multiplayer games to completely and secret diplomacy will no longer be an issue. Team games and 1v1 only. Problem solved....
All 4+ no-round-limit non-objective games tend to become 3 player at some stage, so you've got to know how to play with 3 players. There is a way, but I'm not revealing my tactics

He's British thats all.MagnusGreeol wrote:- Caff., You mad, angry, upset? I stated a fact, SD% reports would decrease without 3 player, that's all I'm saying.
What part of "this it true" don't you understand?iAmCaffeine wrote:What part of no multiplayer don't you understand?clangfield wrote:Whilst this is trueiAmCaffeine wrote:Sure. Let's just remove multiplayer games to completely and secret diplomacy will no longer be an issue. Team games and 1v1 only. Problem solved....
All 4+ no-round-limit non-objective games tend to become 3 player at some stage, so you've got to know how to play with 3 players. There is a way, but I'm not revealing my tactics
- I am not at all suggesting removing 3 player,,I'm saying this,,IF you play 3 player,expect more often than not, that you will be ganged up on,,,except it, and unless you do serious homework/ investigation and compile evidence of repetition SD among members,,,,,then don't file à report, and just understand what's happening.clangfield wrote:What part of "this it true" don't you understand?iAmCaffeine wrote:What part of no multiplayer don't you understand?clangfield wrote:Whilst this is trueiAmCaffeine wrote:Sure. Let's just remove multiplayer games to completely and secret diplomacy will no longer be an issue. Team games and 1v1 only. Problem solved....
All 4+ no-round-limit non-objective games tend to become 3 player at some stage, so you've got to know how to play with 3 players. There is a way, but I'm not revealing my tactics
Yes it would solve the problem - it's hard to tell how seriously you are suggesting it, I suspect not very. Regardless, until it happens, I merely make an observation that there is a skill to 3 player situations from which players of games with more contestants would benefit.
what about when the other guy enlists the neutrals?iAmCaffeine wrote:Sure. Let's just remove multiplayer games to completely and secret diplomacy will no longer be an issue. Team games and 1v1 only. Problem solved.
yeah... i actually have a thread in suggestions about getting that resolved... such a problem and it continues to go unaddressed...-Jésus noirt4mcr53s2 wrote:what about when the other guy enlists the neutrals?iAmCaffeine wrote:Sure. Let's just remove multiplayer games to completely and secret diplomacy will no longer be an issue. Team games and 1v1 only. Problem solved.



TeeGee wrote:with no real evidence being submitted to prove otherwise, I am calling this CLEARED