Moderator: Community Team

you asian f*ck. Although it doesn't look too bad. put EU instead of Germany.mrswdk wrote:Countries who are economically and politically powerful but who do not misuse their power to condone mindless and destabilizing military interventions in sovereign states, and would therefore would make a good new Security Council:
China
Germany
India
Brazil
Japan

tickle tickle!subtleknifewield wrote:lol, don't make me laugh

Nooooo, I'm ticklish!betiko wrote:tickle tickle!subtleknifewield wrote:lol, don't make me laugh
Oh, you're right. China annexing Tibet, violating the souvereign waters of its neighbours, and actively supporting a North-Korean tiranny in its seperation from its southern historical compatriotes just to say "f*ck you western world" is not selfish and militaristic abuse at all.mrswdk wrote:Countries who are economically and politically powerful but who do not misuse their power to condone mindless and destabilizing military interventions in sovereign states, and would therefore would make a good new Security Council:
China
Germany
India
Brazil
Japan

f*ck off, you fast-posting cunt....waauw wrote:Oh, you're right. China annexing Tibet, violating the souvereign waters of its neighbours, and actively supporting a North-Korean tiranny in its seperation from its southern historical compatriotes just to say "f*ck you western world" is not selfish and militaristic abuse at all.mrswdk wrote:Countries who are economically and politically powerful but who do not misuse their power to condone mindless and destabilizing military interventions in sovereign states, and would therefore would make a good new Security Council:
China
Germany
India
Brazil
Japan![]()

I'm not a cunt, you dick.riskllama wrote:f*ck off, you fast-posting cunt....waauw wrote:Oh, you're right. China annexing Tibet, violating the souvereign waters of its neighbours, and actively supporting a North-Korean tiranny in its seperation from its southern historical compatriotes just to say "f*ck you western world" is not selfish and militaristic abuse at all.mrswdk wrote:Countries who are economically and politically powerful but who do not misuse their power to condone mindless and destabilizing military interventions in sovereign states, and would therefore would make a good new Security Council:
China
Germany
India
Brazil
Japan![]()
ISIS militants mainly have civilian clothing, so when killed they would be mourn in front of cameras.betiko wrote:all i see there is a bunch of civilian-like people after getting bombed. So is ISIS over now? It's time to praise Putin?
You forgot Inner Mongolia, Uyghur and few others... China is a flowerriskllama wrote:Tibet & South China Sea, mrs?
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
muy_thaiguy wrote:http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 73751.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... -live.html
https://twitter.com/search?q=russia+bom ... wgr^search
http://www.vox.com/2015/9/30/9423229/ru ... isis-syria
Yep, good job hitting one of the places that does NOT have ISIS forces and has been actively fighting AGAINST ISIS.

Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
Russians are targeting locations they identify as ISIS locations, I wont be surprised if US didn't classify those locations as ISIS locations, after all US are bombing ISIS for over a year with absolutely no success, and Obama claims it will take 30 years to defeat ISIS.muy_thaiguy wrote:http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 73751.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... -live.html
https://twitter.com/search?q=russia+bom ... wgr^search
http://www.vox.com/2015/9/30/9423229/ru ... isis-syria
Yep, good job hitting one of the places that does NOT have ISIS forces and has been actively fighting AGAINST ISIS.
You are assuming that China continues to provide aid to North Korea, a nation with whom China openly has an increasingly cold relationship with and whom China has supported sanctions against in recent years, purely to irritate America. Which is ridiculous.waauw wrote:actively supporting a North-Korean tiranny in its seperation from its southern historical compatriotes just to say "f*ck you western world"
lolWingCmdr Ginkapo wrote: I'll think you'll find the Falklands has always been part of our sovereign state.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
Hey it let you write a post with only three characters.saxitoxin wrote:lolWingCmdr Ginkapo wrote: I'll think you'll find the Falklands has always been part of our sovereign state.
The entire quotation counts as well.mrswdk wrote:Hey it let you write a post with only three characters.saxitoxin wrote:lolWingCmdr Ginkapo wrote: I'll think you'll find the Falklands has always been part of our sovereign state.
No, the Russians are clearly targeting those that have been fighting ISIS since this whole thing started. The US and allies have actually been targeting ISIS from the air while the Kurds hit them on the ground. The Russians targeted a region that does NOT have any ISIS members in it.GoranZ wrote:Russians are targeting locations they identify as ISIS locations, I wont be surprised if US didn't classify those locations as ISIS locations, after all US are bombing ISIS for over a year with absolutely no success, and Obama claims it will take 30 years to defeat ISIS.muy_thaiguy wrote:http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 73751.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... -live.html
https://twitter.com/search?q=russia+bom ... wgr^search
http://www.vox.com/2015/9/30/9423229/ru ... isis-syria
Yep, good job hitting one of the places that does NOT have ISIS forces and has been actively fighting AGAINST ISIS.
In other words...purely self-interest.mrswdk wrote:The Tibet thing has been done on here several times already. Tibet was brought back into the Chinese state at the invitation of Tibet itself. The current tensions in Tibet are nothing to do with independence, they are to do with cultural freedoms. And blah blah blah. All the other things that armchair commentators don't know and are in no hurry to learn about.
But today we have a relatively new angle of attack! Welcome to the party...
You are assuming that China continues to provide aid to North Korea, a nation with whom China openly has an increasingly cold relationship with and whom China has supported sanctions against in recent years, purely to irritate America. Which is ridiculous.waauw wrote:actively supporting a North-Korean tiranny in its seperation from its southern historical compatriotes just to say "f*ck you western world"
The reason China continues to help North Korea get by, despite North Korea eagerly biting the hand that feeds, is because without China's aid North Korea would completely collapse. This would mean millions of refugees pouring across the border into China's north east, and the US/South Korea undoubtedly swooping in to take control of North Korea, which would put American troops on China's border. Given North Korea's enormous army, it would quite likely mean a huge war on China's border, in a country which has nuclear weapons. It is in order to avoid these things that China continues to provide aid to North Korea.
And in any case, providing North Korea with economic and food aid is not an assault on North Korea's sovereignty. China's respect for others upheld, all hail the new world order \(^0^)/