Moderator: Community Team
oddly enough, i even agreed with the OP, but you are so biased against me, you probably didn't even notice that... anyway, i hope you get a nice little ban for this... it has been quite some time since my last death threat... that kid ended up in the custody of the Canadian Mounties (he also threatened lackattackand Twill)... you are truly classy and i find your post highly ironic, given that you make complaints against me and then commit the ultimate forum foul... way to keep it classy!!! the black jesus is smiling down upon you!!-Jésus noirowenshooter wrote:kind of like not searching to see if there is already a thread about the topic you want to vent on? *cough*...xroads wrote:How about this for "I dont give a shit & just going through the motions"
Subject: Why arent random maps, "Random"?????
been a topic of conversation for quite some time... i'm right there with you... the black jesus has spoken..-Jésus noir


oh, you mean USE THE FOE feature? hmmmm... that would seem to be the perfect solution for him... however, the last person that openly declared their love for the foe feature for dealing with me in the forums, spiraled out of control and quit his job... *cough*... the black jesus has spoken...-Jésus noirjbrettlip wrote:If sneering/tone was a ban able offense, this forum would be entirely empty. Isn't there a way to add someone so that you don't spree their posts? Almost every forum has that feature. To me, this just seems like complaining for the sake of complaining. If you are in a thread, and hate Jesus, simply skip past his post

If you have an issue with a user please report them in the C&A forum or flag their posts.Dukasaur wrote:I don't think the issue is about the points you make, which often are valid, but rather about the sneering tone you manage to frame them in.
90% of arguments are not about their putative substance, but about the participants' sense of being respected or disrespected.
Agree with all this. Ltrain, don't act like a dumbass, it's unbecoming. Use the foe feature, and rest your worried and bothered head.owenshooter wrote:oh, you mean USE THE FOE feature? hmmmm... that would seem to be the perfect solution for him... however, the last person that openly declared their love for the foe feature for dealing with me in the forums, spiraled out of control and quit his job... *cough*... the black jesus has spoken...-Jésus noirjbrettlip wrote:If sneering/tone was a ban able offense, this forum would be entirely empty. Isn't there a way to add someone so that you don't spree their posts? Almost every forum has that feature. To me, this just seems like complaining for the sake of complaining. If you are in a thread, and hate Jesus, simply skip past his post
p.s.-public melt downs are very intersting...
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE

i posted the example of the thread that so upset you... i pointed the OP to a thread that already existed that he could have searched for... linked the thread... even said i agreed with him... oddly enough, that sent you off on a tirade declaring i should die... which by the would, should have gotten you an instant ban as soon as the thread was locked and at least a 24 hour vacation... however, as usual, when i'm involved, the rules simply aren't the same... get some thicker skin, learn people personalities, figure out how the forums work... you truly let things affect you in too great a way...Ltrain wrote:Look, I've made my point not much else to say except this: I looked at your ratings today. You clearly know how to be pleasant and friendly in your games. Why not just apply that to the forums?

soooo, you mean to say, he broke a forum rule by posting a duplicate thread of a thread he had already made, and was too lazy to search for? a 4 page, 84 post thread that he himself created and was too lazy to post in? um... ok... your point is very clear... you just keep making yourself look worse... do you understand how the forums work? you start a topic like "why are maps random", and people post in that thread... now, when you want to make ANOTHER comment about maps not being random, you go back to that thread and post in it again!! you don't start a new thread, because you are simply too lazy to search for the old one...Ltrain wrote: did not even notice that the thread you linked in Xroads' thread to make your "dude we already had a thread about this" point was in fact, another thread made BY THE SAME GUY YOU WERE CALLING OUT!

Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis

My lord, Serbia.Serbia wrote:Agree with all this. Ltrain, don't act like a dumbass, it's unbecoming. Use the foe feature, and rest your worried and bothered head.owenshooter wrote:oh, you mean USE THE FOE feature? hmmmm... that would seem to be the perfect solution for him... however, the last person that openly declared their love for the foe feature for dealing with me in the forums, spiraled out of control and quit his job... *cough*... the black jesus has spoken...-Jésus noirjbrettlip wrote:If sneering/tone was a ban able offense, this forum would be entirely empty. Isn't there a way to add someone so that you don't spree their posts? Almost every forum has that feature. To me, this just seems like complaining for the sake of complaining. If you are in a thread, and hate Jesus, simply skip past his post
p.s.-public melt downs are very intersting...
Bollocks in 2015.
So Xroads started a new thread similar to a thread he already made. I just find it funny that you, Mr. Forum moderator (edit) without the actual title (hmm I wonder why) didn't notice this yourself. You took the time to search for a thread similar to the one Xroads had made with the sole purpose of making him look stupid, and didn't even notice that he had made the old thread you were referencing. Even you have to see the hilarious irony there.owenshooter wrote:soooo, you mean to say, he broke a forum rule by posting a duplicate thread of a thread he had already made, and was too lazy to search for? a 4 page, 84 post thread that he himself created and was too lazy to post in? um... ok... your point is very clear... you just keep making yourself look worse... do you understand how the forums work? you start a topic like "why are maps random", and people post in that thread... now, when you want to make ANOTHER comment about maps not being random, you go back to that thread and post in it again!! you don't start a new thread, because you are simply too lazy to search for the old one...Ltrain wrote: did not even notice that the thread you linked in Xroads' thread to make your "dude we already had a thread about this" point was in fact, another thread made BY THE SAME GUY YOU WERE CALLING OUT!
and sorry, it isn't fake outrage... you should be on a forum vacation... you crossed a line and it should be dealt with... appropriate admins were contacted with my concerns... i don't find stating that members should die in a flame/bait thread, amusing... i'm glad you do, because it is disgusting...-Jésus noir
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis

No, this is my (waste of time) crusade, not Xroads, and he is not a friend of mine nor an enemy. He has learned to ignore the bs apparently. I'm not around enough. Owen was in the original thread, and if you read it, page three and four are all just flames, and can you guess who was in the middle of the scrum?eddie2 wrote:A thread that starts in feb and has its last post on 17 july. With over 80 posts. Owen himself was posting in that thread, So to say he searched to find a thread to pull someone up for posting a new one about the same thing is wrong(even more so because like you say they had same op). That original thread had a good convo going on in it. Ow and ps ltrain i do not see xroads complaining about owens comment (or anybody else in the thread.) i also do not see that thread going offtopic (apart from chat about dice which owen didnt bring up). So sorry of all examples you could of used the one you have makes you look silly. Because 1. there was a active thread from the op talking about it already. 2. The new thread didnt go offtopic. So everything you accused him off is not shown in your example.
hmmm... i see about 6 people involved in what you consider flaming... but apparently it is just me... even one EX-community volunteer, who was still a volunteer at the time... i'm sorry, i just don't really think you understand what a flame is... and again, you lost all credibility when you issued a death threat to a member in the forums. what you did was far worse than a few adults that are familiar with each other, having some fun... you have to remember, many of us have been going at in the forums for 8 or more years... get over it, you just don't seem to understand the nuances of the culture of this particular portion of the forum... the black jesus has spoken (and surely you will also consider this all a flame *eyes rolling)...-Jésus noirLtrain wrote:Owen was in the original thread, and if you read it, page three and four are all just flames, and can you guess who was in the middle of the scrum?
