Moderator: Cartographers
Seriously, what's holding this up?Donelladan wrote:This map is perfect. Could you put it ouf of beta ?
I think your answer may lie on the previous page...JPlo64 wrote:Seriously, what's holding this up?Donelladan wrote:This map is perfect. Could you put it ouf of beta ?
Lavoye wrote:It is hard to figure out the complete border of the Charente-Maritime region and if it touches or not with Dordogne
Mishalex wrote:The gameplay is going to change a bit so that will be possible to attack foreign claim from adjacent territories such as NORD...
Objectives are not a part of the game play in most maps. Doesn't mean those maps need a lot of work.ooge wrote:Val-d'olse and yvelines connected by a bridge.Paris not part of game play in most games. map needs a lot of work.
The objective is not a factor in most games adding that bridge I suggested would be more incentive to try for it.from what I have been told not all the foreign claims work either.Donelladan wrote:Objectives are not a part of the game play in most maps. Doesn't mean those maps need a lot of work.ooge wrote:Val-d'olse and yvelines connected by a bridge.Paris not part of game play in most games. map needs a lot of work.
A brigde between val d'oise and yvelines would make the objective easier to get, not a good idea.
Imho, the map game play is perfect. Nothing to be changed.
Only change I'd like is graphical, to make the border between charente maritime and charente a bit more clear for people that can't see it. Except that tiny graphical change to make the border a bit more clear, map gameplay is perfect.

Somehow the old version of the map from last year was quenched. Border visibility between Charente-Maritime and Dordogne is still a problem. The graphics and XML change to make the foreign claims two-way never happened.waauw wrote:
map quenched. The only person who seems to be against quenching is ooge and he is being contradicted.
Some disagreements will never get solved.
This graphics & XML change was supposed to happen in October.Lancelot du Lac wrote:Map name:France 2.1
Link to thread:http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 4&t=157659
Link to large image:http://nsa33.casimages.com/img/2014/10/ ... 944214.png
Link to small image:http://nsa34.casimages.com/img/2014/10/ ... 858770.png
Link to an image with neutrals and starting positions:http://nsa34.casimages.com/img/2014/10/ ... 801956.png
xml is joined in attachement. Good test
I'll look into the old-new version thingie. As for the two-way attacks. Several other people seem to disagree on this and think the map is perfect as it is already, so I'm just considering this as a never-ending conflict point.Fuchsia tude wrote:Somehow the old version of the map from last year was quenched. Border visibility between Charente-Maritime and Dordogne is still a problem. The graphics and XML change to make the foreign claims two-way never happened.waauw wrote:
map quenched. The only person who seems to be against quenching is ooge and he is being contradicted.
Some disagreements will never get solved.
This graphics & XML change was supposed to happen in October.Lancelot du Lac wrote:Map name:France 2.1
Link to thread:http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 4&t=157659
Link to large image:http://nsa33.casimages.com/img/2014/10/ ... 944214.png
Link to small image:http://nsa34.casimages.com/img/2014/10/ ... 858770.png
Link to an image with neutrals and starting positions:http://nsa34.casimages.com/img/2014/10/ ... 801956.png
xml is joined in attachement. Good test