Guaranteed Suggestion Implementation- Round 4

ManBungalow · Post by **ManBungalow** » Mon Apr 06, 2015 7:11 pm

I'd vote for the game finder thingy.

Endgame422 · Post by **Endgame422** » Tue Apr 07, 2015 2:20 am

grt wrote:I don't see anything about auto snap at the start of fog games. Surely this should be one of the top suggestions?

I tried suggesting this during round one of the guaranteed suggestions and was told something about it being a coding issue somehow.
I dont think it will happen unfortunately.

Ragnars Wolves · Post by **Ragnars Wolves** » Fri Apr 10, 2015 9:04 am

You now what irritates me about this whole discussion....

I am on here PLAYING and not sitting in the forum all day cutting other people down and putting up suggestions and ideas for the folks to vote on. Most of the people are PLAYING, not talking.

If you want an accurate count, figure out a way to get the message to the people and make the choices simple and explain why you think they are a good deal. Most here like what they have but might just like one of those ideas better.

Also...you guys that are are in the forums and (not ALL of you by any means) want to cut down the MAJORITY that voted and didn't vote for YOUR choice. You act like sullen third grade children.

The public has spoken.....Live with it

No different than someone being president and us living with it....live with it. Hell, I lived thru the Carter years and am still here. THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN!! (doesn't mean it is the best choice and we will have to live with it for a while. But the difference is we can have a re-vote on different options (or revised) same options. Combine some options..I bet that gets more votes.

In other words...Quit whining about how stupid the voters were. They have been doing that for 8 years and it hasn't done any good...all we can do is look forward to Hillary and reset (not trying to be political...just drawing a parallel that I am also tired of hearing. I am an Independent..so I can bitch about either party!!!

FrenchPupil · Post by **FrenchPupil** » Mon May 04, 2015 11:48 am

What' the round 3 guaranteed implementation in the end ?

Post by **Dukasaur** » Fri Jun 19, 2015 11:04 pm

So, what is happening with this one?

JamesKer1 · Post by **JamesKer1** » Fri Jun 19, 2015 11:22 pm

The final winner was the GameFinder pack. However, BW did not determine there to be enough interest this round for it to be worth his time to implement.

Fewnix · Post by **Fewnix** » Sat Jun 20, 2015 12:56 am

Not a smart move on BigWhams part.

JamesKer1 wrote:The final winner was the GameFinder pack. However, BW did not determine there to be enough interest this round for it to be worth his time to implement.

Post by **Dukasaur** » Sat Jun 20, 2015 1:54 pm

JamesKer1 wrote:The final winner was the GameFinder pack. However, BW did not determine there to be enough interest this round for it to be worth his time to implement.

I was shocked by this statement, so I immediately sent a message to BW asking for clarification.

The relevant excepts:

bigWham wrote:
"guaranteed" is guaranteed.

I did comment on the poor response level

nonetheless, i still intend to do it.

He may not be thrilled about this one, but he intends to honour the commitment he made.

Fewnix · Post by **Fewnix** » Sat Jun 20, 2015 4:43 pm

Fewnix wrote:Hi mate,

Few here. we have talked before and you know I have backed you on various things and thanked you for various things. You almost lost me with this one

Re: Guaranteed Suggestion Implementation- Round 3

Postby Fewnix on Sat Jun 20, 2015 12:56 am
Not a smart move on BigWhams part.

JamesKer1 wrote:
The final winner was the GameFinder pack. However, BW did not determine there to be enough interest this round for it to be worth his time to implement.

Thanks for the Duks intervention and your honourable response.

he intends to honour the commitmen
you have me again.

We cool?

Few

Dukasaur wrote:
JamesKer1 wrote:The final winner was the GameFinder pack. However, BW did not determine there to be enough interest this round for it to be worth his time to implement.
I was shocked by this statement, so I immediately sent a message to BW asking for clarification.

The relevant excepts:
bigWham wrote:
"guaranteed" is guaranteed.

I did comment on the poor response level

nonetheless, i still intend to do it.

He may not be thrilled about this one, but he intends to honour the commitment he made.

JamesKer1 · Post by **JamesKer1** » Sun Jun 21, 2015 1:47 pm

JamesKer1 wrote:However, BW did not determine there to be enough interest this round for it to be worth his time to implement.

The big man asked me to withdraw this statement due to its inaccuracy, and to remind everyone it may take a while, but he still intends to honor his commitment. Sorry for the fuss.

FrenchPupil · Post by **FrenchPupil** » Mon Jun 22, 2015 5:05 am

JamesKer1 wrote:
JamesKer1 wrote:However, BW did not determine there to be enough interest this round for it to be worth his time to implement.
The big man asked me to withdraw this statement due to its inaccuracy, and to remind everyone it may take a while, but he still intends to honor his commitment. Sorry for the fuss.

That's a good news

Silly Knig-it · Post by **Silly Knig-it** » Fri Jun 26, 2015 2:01 am

JamesKer1 wrote:
JamesKer1 wrote:However, BW did not determine there to be enough interest this round for it to be worth his time to implement.
The big man asked me to withdraw this statement due to its inaccuracy, and to remind everyone it may take a while, but he still intends to honor his commitment. Sorry for the fuss.

There is not a lack of interest, just a lack of interest in what we are offered. I for one rarely read this forum for that reason. I would love to get fired up about CC again but I am still waiting for basic functions of the panel interface to work on tablets.

FrenchPupil · Post by **FrenchPupil** » Fri Jun 26, 2015 2:24 am

Personally Speaking, i appreciate the Guaranted Suggestion Implementation as well as the Suggestion Forum ... There is a lot to do for sure,

Nonetheless, development priorities should be decided by the management, and it should fit with the strategic vision and mission of CC.
The vision should generate the interest in the long term for the site ...

Users might not have the time to contribute, think about what they want, visit forums and / or read their pm ... After all, we are all here to play and enjoy our favorite game, engage in war and tournament ... BUT, we are all interested in a the development of CC tools, options, interface, etc ... so it is more friendly, easy and fast to use, bug free, etc ...

I suppose that
- clan leader wants more game and players analysis tool (like map rank, clan rank, revamp finder, and others stats ... )
- the map maker, would like to have tool to design new maps ... (maybe they have it, no clue ... )
- etc ...

JamesKer1 · Post by **JamesKer1** » Wed Jul 08, 2015 11:07 pm

Round 4 is open!!!!

FrenchPupil · Post by **FrenchPupil** » Thu Jul 09, 2015 1:37 am

No interest in any of this proposal ... So no vote ...

SilverWill · Post by **SilverWill** » Thu Jul 09, 2015 1:49 am

hmm I see the benefit for the "watch this game" suggestion for tournament organizers and mentors for new players. It would allow them to keep track of games that they are managing without having to track the game down or be a player in them.

iAmCaffeine · Post by **iAmCaffeine** » Thu Jul 09, 2015 6:59 am

Watch this game is a valuable tool which I, among others, can no longer use since the disastrous panels were introduced. You never really realise how good it is until you try it.

FrenchPupil · Post by **FrenchPupil** » Thu Jul 09, 2015 1:05 pm

Changed my vote then

macbone · Post by **macbone** » Thu Jul 09, 2015 9:56 pm

Yeah, Watch This Game is a pretty useful tool.

No Maprank as part of the site? That would be tremendous! Still, I'll vote for Watch This Game.

JamesKer1 · Post by **JamesKer1** » Thu Jul 09, 2015 10:18 pm

macbone wrote:Yeah, Watch This Game is a pretty useful tool.

No Maprank as part of the site? That would be tremendous! Still, I'll vote for Watch This Game.

bigWham wrote:
- MapRank is just too complicated, and ultimately the data is highly questionable anyways - if someone were to come up with something more specific as to what a simplified MR was, I would certainly consider it.

iAmCaffeine · Post by **iAmCaffeine** » Fri Jul 10, 2015 3:53 am

JamesKer1 wrote:
macbone wrote:Yeah, Watch This Game is a pretty useful tool.

No Maprank as part of the site? That would be tremendous! Still, I'll vote for Watch This Game.

bigWham wrote:
- MapRank is just too complicated, and ultimately the data is highly questionable anyways - if someone were to come up with something more specific as to what a simplified MR was, I would certainly consider it.

I'd assume the two easiest methods would be via a link on a player's profile, like Map Rank used to allow, or something akin to the Game Finder. All you need is a database of all the games each player has played on each map. Ideally, one would be able to specify between game types and settings, but that's not necessarily essential to begin with.

codierose · Post by **codierose** » Fri Jul 10, 2015 11:54 am

can we vote for more than one lol

Post by **Dukasaur** » Fri Jul 10, 2015 11:56 am

codierose wrote:can we vote for more than one lol

Poll says you can select two options.

Post by **shoop76** » Fri Jul 10, 2015 7:45 pm

Definitely watch this game from these options, though maprank would be my first choice.

Kevi · Post by **Kevi** » Sat Jul 11, 2015 7:23 pm

Endgame422 wrote:
grt wrote:I don't see anything about auto snap at the start of fog games. Surely this should be one of the top suggestions?
I tried suggesting this during round one of the guaranteed suggestions and was told something about it being a coding issue somehow.
I dont think it will happen unfortunately.

How about a new game? There could be fog and fog12 with a 12 hr delay just like freestyle has a 1 hr delay.

Guaranteed Suggestion Implementation- Round 4

Which Suggestion would you like to see implemented?

Re: Guaranteed Suggestion Implementation- Round 3

Re: Guaranteed Suggestion Implementation- Round 3

Re: Guaranteed Suggestion Implementation- Round 3

Re: Guaranteed Suggestion Implementation- Round 3

Re: Guaranteed Suggestion Implementation- Round 3

Re: Guaranteed Suggestion Implementation- Round 3

Re: Guaranteed Suggestion Implementation- Round 3

Re: Guaranteed Suggestion Implementation- Round 3

Re: Guaranteed Suggestion Implementation- Round 3

Re: Guaranteed Suggestion Implementation- Round 3

Re: Guaranteed Suggestion Implementation- Round 3

Re: Guaranteed Suggestion Implementation- Round 3

Re: Guaranteed Suggestion Implementation- Round 3

Re: Guaranteed Suggestion Implementation- Round 4

Re: Guaranteed Suggestion Implementation- Round 4

Re: Guaranteed Suggestion Implementation- Round 4

Re: Guaranteed Suggestion Implementation- Round 4

Re: Guaranteed Suggestion Implementation- Round 4

Re: Guaranteed Suggestion Implementation- Round 4

Re: Guaranteed Suggestion Implementation- Round 4

Re: Guaranteed Suggestion Implementation- Round 4

Re: Guaranteed Suggestion Implementation- Round 4

Re: Guaranteed Suggestion Implementation- Round 4

Re: Guaranteed Suggestion Implementation- Round 4

Re: Guaranteed Suggestion Implementation- Round 3