No.. some are gloriously heteronotyou2 wrote:Are the terms male model and gay synonymous?
Moderator: Community Team

No.. some are gloriously heteronotyou2 wrote:Are the terms male model and gay synonymous?
fishydance wrote:No.. some are gloriously heteronotyou2 wrote:Are the terms male model and gay synonymous?


No waynotyou2 wrote:fishydance wrote:No.. some are gloriously heteronotyou2 wrote:Are the terms male model and gay synonymous?
Are the terms gloriously hetero and top synonymous?
in ya face mets and nietzsche, the lady has spoken!Tisha wrote:Who really cares if they are being objectified... They are actresses.. If you have two here that can act, you are going to pick the one that looks the part... Based on looks...
What's wrong with being objectified anyways? I pass people everyday that I'd like to be my coin operated toy, or ugh, put a bag on your head. . Males get objectified, females get objectified, who cares. I know that the outward appearance is only about 10% of what a person is about, but I still have my opinion about that, everyone does.
Ask about physical preferences all you want.
I don't like either one of their faces, which are weird similar. They're pretty, but not hot.
I voted Drew because I like blonde and bigger tits.
Titties win.


Actually while I agree that Mets may be a bit OTT on the subject, he has a point. I am a pretty tall girl and a normal US 8 yet I've been told that I am fat to my face by the opposite sex. At the time I was really sick and had put on a little weight from not being able to go walking but still wasn't overweight. ATM my sister is killing herself to stay skinny. She thinks that she needs to eat nothing, smoke and destroy her health for what exactly. She used to have weight issues but wasn't fat. Nothing joining a gym and building some muscle wouldnt fix. Men can be awful fuckers but it is Hollywood that has it like this. Obviously not all guys. No woman would ever tell a man who was simply a healthy weight that he was fat. There is quite a difference in how the sexes are portrayed by the media. This is why women get a bit sensitive about it.nietzsche wrote:Obviously people here is old and don't know how beautiful Michelle Monaghan is.
But I think that if someone is losing is Metsy.
i mean, he's more feminist that women. We can agree that it's not cool to alienate not-photoshopped women, but I know that women talk about men in the same way, althouhg for some reason the fixate in things like nose and arms, besides the obvious butt.
We are even expected to behave this way. And women use it to their advantage with those tight jeans or short skirts. I think Metsy is overly sensitive to the subject.

Boohoo, a man said you're fat when you're not. Why do you give a crap? Haters gonna hate. Just ignore them.Shannon Apple wrote:Actually while I agree that Mets may be a bit OTT on the subject, he has a point. I am a pretty tall girl and a normal US 8 yet I've been told that I am fat to my face by the opposite sex. At the time I was really sick and had put on a little weight from not being able to go walking but still wasn't overweight. ATM my sister is killing herself to stay skinny. She thinks that she needs to eat nothing, smoke and destroy her health for what exactly. She used to have weight issues but wasn't fat. Nothing joining a gym and building some muscle wouldnt fix. Men can be awful fuckers but it is Hollywood that has it like this. Obviously not all guys. No woman would ever tell a man who was simply a healthy weight that he was fat. There is quite a difference in how the sexes are portrayed by the media. This is why women get a bit sensitive about it.
Nothing wrong with asking who is prettier. That's an okay question IMO because its simply about a persons face really. Its the hot or not threads that piss me off.

I don't give a crap for me, that's my point... But plenty of girls have issues because of shit like that. I've had so much said to me by online jerks in games like evony that I'm pretty indifferent to most comments IRL. :pmrswdk wrote:Boohoo, a man said you're fat when you're not. Why do you give a crap? Haters gonna hate. Just ignore them.Shannon Apple wrote:Actually while I agree that Mets may be a bit OTT on the subject, he has a point. I am a pretty tall girl and a normal US 8 yet I've been told that I am fat to my face by the opposite sex. At the time I was really sick and had put on a little weight from not being able to go walking but still wasn't overweight. ATM my sister is killing herself to stay skinny. She thinks that she needs to eat nothing, smoke and destroy her health for what exactly. She used to have weight issues but wasn't fat. Nothing joining a gym and building some muscle wouldnt fix. Men can be awful fuckers but it is Hollywood that has it like this. Obviously not all guys. No woman would ever tell a man who was simply a healthy weight that he was fat. There is quite a difference in how the sexes are portrayed by the media. This is why women get a bit sensitive about it.
Nothing wrong with asking who is prettier. That's an okay question IMO because its simply about a persons face really. Its the hot or not threads that piss me off.
Just ignore them (the girls).Shannon Apple wrote:I don't give a crap for me, that's my point... But plenty of girls have issues because of shit like that.mrswdk wrote:Boohoo, a man said you're fat when you're not. Why do you give a crap? Haters gonna hate. Just ignore them.Shannon Apple wrote:Actually while I agree that Mets may be a bit OTT on the subject, he has a point. I am a pretty tall girl and a normal US 8 yet I've been told that I am fat to my face by the opposite sex. At the time I was really sick and had put on a little weight from not being able to go walking but still wasn't overweight. ATM my sister is killing herself to stay skinny. She thinks that she needs to eat nothing, smoke and destroy her health for what exactly. She used to have weight issues but wasn't fat. Nothing joining a gym and building some muscle wouldnt fix. Men can be awful fuckers but it is Hollywood that has it like this. Obviously not all guys. No woman would ever tell a man who was simply a healthy weight that he was fat. There is quite a difference in how the sexes are portrayed by the media. This is why women get a bit sensitive about it.
Nothing wrong with asking who is prettier. That's an okay question IMO because its simply about a persons face really. Its the hot or not threads that piss me off.
While I agree that women are more judged on physic than men by the society in general, it isn't true that women would never tell that to a guy, women can also be extremely mean to guy with a bit of overweight. Women also judge men on physic and also say nasty things in their face.No woman would ever tell a man who was simply a healthy weight that he was fat.

Both sides can be mean to overweight people. I mean a guy who is not overweight but not a skinny malink or muscleman. Normal healthy weight. It happens to normal healthy weight women all the time. Society is ridiculous. Lol.Donelladan wrote:While I agree that women are more judged on physic than men by the society in general, it isn't true that women would never tell that to a guy, women can also be extremely mean to guy with a bit of overweight. Women also judge men on physic and also say nasty things in their face.No woman would ever tell a man who was simply a healthy weight that he was fat.


You're right, they're not even on the same planet.IcePack wrote:How in the world anyone finds Barrymore attractive is beyond me.
Her acting might be ok but there's no way she would make the top 100 most attractive list if I were to make one of Hollywood actresses.
Therefore, I voted Michelle and would do so again every time. They aren't on the same planet.
Oh no, you're in trouble mister. Mets will read this and you'll see.Dukasaur wrote:You're right, they're not even on the same planet.IcePack wrote:How in the world anyone finds Barrymore attractive is beyond me.
Her acting might be ok but there's no way she would make the top 100 most attractive list if I were to make one of Hollywood actresses.
Therefore, I voted Michelle and would do so again every time. They aren't on the same planet.
Drew Barrymore is a full-blown superhottie. Devastatingly seductive eyes that could make a man melt even if the rest of her was nothing, but the rest of her isn't nothing. Beautiful figure, big jugs, fullsome lips, amazing legs.
The other broad is a flat-chested tomboy. Kinda cute in a girl-next-door-that-would-help-you-disassemble-the-lawn-mower kind of way, but not remotely close to feminine and definitely nothing special. Furthermore, who is she? I gather that she's an actress of some kind, but I don't remember any movie she's been in. That in itself should say something. Totally average, totally unmemorable.
Drew Barrymore may have been hot in 1998 for the Wedding Singer, but I wouldn't touch that with a 10 foot stick now that she's turned 40.Dukasaur wrote:You're right, they're not even on the same planet.IcePack wrote:How in the world anyone finds Barrymore attractive is beyond me.
Her acting might be ok but there's no way she would make the top 100 most attractive list if I were to make one of Hollywood actresses.
Therefore, I voted Michelle and would do so again every time. They aren't on the same planet.
Drew Barrymore is a full-blown superhottie. Devastatingly seductive eyes that could make a man melt even if the rest of her was nothing, but the rest of her isn't nothing. Beautiful figure, big jugs, fullsome lips, amazing legs.
The other broad is a flat-chested tomboy. Kinda cute in a girl-next-door-that-would-help-you-disassemble-the-lawn-mower kind of way, but not remotely close to feminine and definitely nothing special. Furthermore, who is she? I gather that she's an actress of some kind, but I don't remember any movie she's been in. That in itself should say something. Totally average, totally unmemorable.
Kiss Kiss, Bang Bang. Check it.Dukasaur wrote:You're right, they're not even on the same planet.IcePack wrote:How in the world anyone finds Barrymore attractive is beyond me.
Her acting might be ok but there's no way she would make the top 100 most attractive list if I were to make one of Hollywood actresses.
Therefore, I voted Michelle and would do so again every time. They aren't on the same planet.
Drew Barrymore is a full-blown superhottie. Devastatingly seductive eyes that could make a man melt even if the rest of her was nothing, but the rest of her isn't nothing. Beautiful figure, big jugs, fullsome lips, amazing legs.
The other broad is a flat-chested tomboy. Kinda cute in a girl-next-door-that-would-help-you-disassemble-the-lawn-mower kind of way, but not remotely close to feminine and definitely nothing special. Furthermore, who is she? I gather that she's an actress of some kind, but I don't remember any movie she's been in. That in itself should say something. Totally average, totally unmemorable.
<sigh> Children and their myopic age prejudices.Metsfanmax wrote:Drew Barrymore may have been hot in 1998 for the Wedding Singer, but I wouldn't touch that with a 10 foot stick now that she's turned 40.Dukasaur wrote:You're right, they're not even on the same planet.IcePack wrote:How in the world anyone finds Barrymore attractive is beyond me.
Her acting might be ok but there's no way she would make the top 100 most attractive list if I were to make one of Hollywood actresses.
Therefore, I voted Michelle and would do so again every time. They aren't on the same planet.
Drew Barrymore is a full-blown superhottie. Devastatingly seductive eyes that could make a man melt even if the rest of her was nothing, but the rest of her isn't nothing. Beautiful figure, big jugs, fullsome lips, amazing legs.
The other broad is a flat-chested tomboy. Kinda cute in a girl-next-door-that-would-help-you-disassemble-the-lawn-mower kind of way, but not remotely close to feminine and definitely nothing special. Furthermore, who is she? I gather that she's an actress of some kind, but I don't remember any movie she's been in. That in itself should say something. Totally average, totally unmemorable.
It is not universal. Mary-Louise Parker is older than my mom and I would throw away a marriage to sleep with her.Dukasaur wrote:<sigh> Children and their myopic age prejudices.Metsfanmax wrote:Drew Barrymore may have been hot in 1998 for the Wedding Singer, but I wouldn't touch that with a 10 foot stick now that she's turned 40.Dukasaur wrote:You're right, they're not even on the same planet.IcePack wrote:How in the world anyone finds Barrymore attractive is beyond me.
Her acting might be ok but there's no way she would make the top 100 most attractive list if I were to make one of Hollywood actresses.
Therefore, I voted Michelle and would do so again every time. They aren't on the same planet.
Drew Barrymore is a full-blown superhottie. Devastatingly seductive eyes that could make a man melt even if the rest of her was nothing, but the rest of her isn't nothing. Beautiful figure, big jugs, fullsome lips, amazing legs.
The other broad is a flat-chested tomboy. Kinda cute in a girl-next-door-that-would-help-you-disassemble-the-lawn-mower kind of way, but not remotely close to feminine and definitely nothing special. Furthermore, who is she? I gather that she's an actress of some kind, but I don't remember any movie she's been in. That in itself should say something. Totally average, totally unmemorable.

Go seek medical attention. You've clearly lost all ability to see and think clearly.Dukasaur wrote:You're right, they're not even on the same planet.IcePack wrote:How in the world anyone finds Barrymore attractive is beyond me.
Her acting might be ok but there's no way she would make the top 100 most attractive list if I were to make one of Hollywood actresses.
Therefore, I voted Michelle and would do so again every time. They aren't on the same planet.
Drew Barrymore is a full-blown superhottie. Devastatingly seductive eyes that could make a man melt even if the rest of her was nothing, but the rest of her isn't nothing. Beautiful figure, big jugs, fullsome lips, amazing legs.
The other broad is a flat-chested tomboy. Kinda cute in a girl-next-door-that-would-help-you-disassemble-the-lawn-mower kind of way, but not remotely close to feminine and definitely nothing special. Furthermore, who is she? I gather that she's an actress of some kind, but I don't remember any movie she's been in. That in itself should say something. Totally average, totally unmemorable.

Five hours in make up and proper lighting makes a minor difference me thinks.Dukasaur wrote: <sigh> Children and their myopic age prejudices.
I'd still give my right arm to f*ck Susan Sarandon, and she's 68. I saw her a few days ago on Letterman, and she was still every bit as smoking hot as she was in 1975. If you've got that magical je ne sais qui, it doesn't just go away.
