Streaker's Second Mafia - Endgame - Employees win!

by **dd515087** on Wed Feb 04, 2015 12:58 pm

I investigated virus last night because a lot of people thought he was suspicious. Got the same "no result" result as when I investigated IB

by **HotShot53** on Wed Feb 04, 2015 1:41 pm

dd515087 wrote:I investigated virus last night because a lot of people thought he was suspicious. Got the same "no result" result as when I investigated IB

Can you ask for more clarification what exactly you are investigating, and what kind of results you'd get if you did get results?

by **StorrZerg** on Wed Feb 04, 2015 1:42 pm

i think it's possible the lack of return could be indication of not a threat to you.

by **StorrZerg** on Wed Feb 04, 2015 1:46 pm

Really hope dd5 is 3rd party wincon is finding and killing some random

by **HotShot53** on Wed Feb 04, 2015 1:53 pm

StorrZerg wrote:Hotshot been bandwagoning most of the game.

Virus did push his own case, own ideas. that gives him some town credit even though it was on the doc. He also pushed day 1 on crasp. It wasn't sudden pressure.

I have made 4 votes so far... looking back I was the third vote on colton, and encouraged pressure on him, and he turned out scum. I was the third vote on legion, which everyone backed off from based on IB's claim. I was the first vote on virus both yesterday and again today. So I have pushed as many original cases as virus (one), and have participated in everything else, including the scum lynch... so I'm not exactly seeing me as bandwagonning so much.

by **HotShot53** on Wed Feb 04, 2015 1:55 pm

StorrZerg wrote:i think it's possible the lack of return could be indication of not a threat to you.

I have a different theory, but I don't want to say it so dd can't use it if he's just faking stuff. I'd like to hear what the mod has to say to him about it.

by **dd515087** on Wed Feb 04, 2015 6:37 pm

HotShot53 wrote:
dd515087 wrote:I investigated virus last night because a lot of people thought he was suspicious. Got the same "no result" result as when I investigated IB

Can you ask for more clarification what exactly you are investigating, and what kind of results you'd get if you did get results?

I can ask but it literally says in my role PM that I will know what kind of results I get when I get them.

As for third party, no, I win when all threats to employees are eliminated.

by **StorrZerg** on Wed Feb 04, 2015 7:13 pm

So fking ask, does you literally no harm to ask more pointed questions about how your new unique role works.

by **legionnare** on Wed Feb 04, 2015 7:34 pm

Iron Butterfly wrote:
legionnare wrote:
Iron Butterfly wrote:I believe I was blocked as I was unable to open my gift, which was not the same gift that Storr received.

How do you know it was not the same as Storr's if you couldn't open it?

Storrr received a flash drive. I received a glowing ball. Like Storr was given the choice to open it. I replied I would open it. I was then informed this morning that I failed in opening my gift.

I would be curious as to what the results were from DDs night action.

We had a night kill from mafia and I believe I was blocked, which makes perfect sense as I used a cop investigation on you the night before. I highly doubt DD was blocked by mafia last night.

Ok I understand now, interesting that having your action blocked would stop you from opening it. Do you think Virus is being set up?

by **legionnare** on Wed Feb 04, 2015 7:35 pm

Storr what happened with your USB stick, you never revealed what was on it?

by **legionnare** on Wed Feb 04, 2015 7:35 pm

Mets; you have had time to catch up, what are your thoughts?

by **dd515087** on Wed Feb 04, 2015 9:05 pm

StorrZerg wrote:So fking ask, does you literally no harm to ask more pointed questions about how your new unique role works.

I did. Waiting to hear back...

by **StorrZerg** on Wed Feb 04, 2015 10:26 pm

TAMBO ARE YOU UPSET YOU FAILED TO KILL ME N1????

by **Iron Butterfly** on Wed Feb 04, 2015 11:41 pm

I am getting pissed that the main suspects are the ones that refuse to post.

Ironic Mets takes up the mantle to only go silent...still day one...but still friggin annoying.

Do I think Virus is being set up? Its hard to say. Him, Mtam and to some extent Mets as an extension of both Bear and AoG have not made things easy in scum reading. All three can not be mafia.

by **dd515087** on Thu Feb 05, 2015 2:47 am

Apparently, I get told the alignment of the person I investigate. I do not know what "no result" means. Maybe I was blocked? Or they could both be the same alignment and I am only told if they are of a certain alignment? IDK

by **Streaker** on Thu Feb 05, 2015 3:01 am

Vote count:

virus90 (2): HotShot53, ???

There are 9 still employed, it takes 5 to Fire someone.

by **StorrZerg** on Thu Feb 05, 2015 7:00 am

Vote hotshot

by **StorrZerg** on Thu Feb 05, 2015 7:15 am

HotShot53 wrote:Well, no-one has said anything that scummy yet really... so I will vote for the most inactive person so far, vote colton
As others have said, checking in late but giving no opinion on anything then or since then isn't that great. To be honest, I would expect dd to be town rather than scum, usually scum are more interested in the game early on, enough to make 1 or 2 posts anyway; anyone who's played knows that not posting at all will get you voted, so I don't think that was intentional on his part.

pushed colton as inactive. thats fine doesn't mean to much lets see how he follows up.

And thats it, you don't write up any follow up to him, you dont comment on any of his newer posts.

HotShot53 wrote:Well, no-one has said anything that scummy yet really... so I will vote for the most inactive person so far, vote colton
As others have said, checking in late but giving no opinion on anything then or since then isn't that great. To be honest, I would expect dd to be town rather than scum, usually scum are more interested in the game early on, enough to make 1 or 2 posts anyway; anyone who's played knows that not posting at all will get you voted, so I don't think that was intentional on his part.

See we know you had been around, and we know you did decide to leave your vote. The thing is, i was really trying to convince mets to vote, you had an opportunity to come in and make a statement about how you felt, even if it wasn't strong, you knew the correct course was ideally to make a lynch. This could have been helpful at the time, something you decided to not do.
the ommission is what i find scummy. (then we have day 2 where you think im confirmed but ill go over that latter i have to head out now)

by **StorrZerg** on Thu Feb 05, 2015 7:41 am

dd515087 wrote:Apparently, I get told the alignment of the person I investigate. I do not know what "no result" means. Maybe I was blocked? Or they could both be the same alignment and I am only told if they are of a certain alignment? IDK

Ask if that means block or could be blocked.

by **Streaker** on Thu Feb 05, 2015 8:19 am

StorrZerg wrote:
dd515087 wrote:Apparently, I get told the alignment of the person I investigate. I do not know what "no result" means. Maybe I was blocked? Or they could both be the same alignment and I am only told if they are of a certain alignment? IDK

Ask if that means block or could be blocked.

Will make this public knowledge: I will not state that it means one or the other. I gave dd a sufficient answer on what a result could be.

by **HotShot53** on Thu Feb 05, 2015 8:40 am

dd515087 wrote:Apparently, I get told the alignment of the person I investigate. I do not know what "no result" means. Maybe I was blocked? Or they could both be the same alignment and I am only told if they are of a certain alignment? IDK

I have been a sort-of-cop before, where you get told if the people are the same alignment or different as the person you investigated the night before... Or maybe you only are looking for someone who doesn't belong, like a 3rd party... or maybe you were blocked both nights (could be a town RB as well as a scum RB or something). Doesn't sound like we'll figure it out until you get actual results.

Streaker wrote:Vote count:

virus90 (2): HotShot53, ???

There are 9 still employed, it takes 5 to Fire someone.

We need some more votes and activity people...

by **StorrZerg** on Thu Feb 05, 2015 8:44 am

Yes agree lynch hotshot.

by **Iron Butterfly** on Thu Feb 05, 2015 8:57 am

Streaker is DD aloud ta say what specific results could be?

by **charm** on Thu Feb 05, 2015 10:21 am

VOTE Virus

This is getting boring!

Zerg - you're starting to make me twitch a bit. The numbers are not adding up! I'm going to have to re-analyze your play this game.

by **StorrZerg** on Thu Feb 05, 2015 10:42 am

I'm confirmed town girl

Streaker's Second Mafia - Endgame - Employees win!

Re: Streaker's Second Mafia - Day 3 - What Safety? (9/12)

Re: Streaker's Second Mafia - Day 3 - What Safety? (9/12)

Re: Streaker's Second Mafia - Day 3 - What Safety? (9/12)

Re: Streaker's Second Mafia - Day 3 - What Safety? (9/12)

Re: Streaker's Second Mafia - Day 3 - What Safety? (9/12)

Re: Streaker's Second Mafia - Day 3 - What Safety? (9/12)

Re: Streaker's Second Mafia - Day 3 - What Safety? (9/12)

Re: Streaker's Second Mafia - Day 3 - What Safety? (9/12)

Re: Streaker's Second Mafia - Day 3 - What Safety? (9/12)

Re: Streaker's Second Mafia - Day 3 - What Safety? (9/12)

Re: Streaker's Second Mafia - Day 3 - What Safety? (9/12)

Re: Streaker's Second Mafia - Day 3 - What Safety? (9/12)

Re: Streaker's Second Mafia - Day 3 - What Safety? (9/12)

Re: Streaker's Second Mafia - Day 3 - What Safety? (9/12)

Re: Streaker's Second Mafia - Day 3 - What Safety? (9/12)

Re: Streaker's Second Mafia - Day 3 - What Safety? (9/12)

Re: Streaker's Second Mafia - Day 3 - What Safety? (9/12)

Re: Streaker's Second Mafia - Day 3 - What Safety? (9/12)

Re: Streaker's Second Mafia - Day 3 - What Safety? (9/12)

Re: Streaker's Second Mafia - Day 3 - What Safety? (9/12)

Re: Streaker's Second Mafia - Day 3 - What Safety? (9/12)

Re: Streaker's Second Mafia - Day 3 - What Safety? (9/12)

Re: Streaker's Second Mafia - Day 3 - What Safety? (9/12)

Re: Streaker's Second Mafia - Day 3 - What Safety? (9/12)

Re: Streaker's Second Mafia - Day 3 - What Safety? (9/12)

Who is online