Moderator: Community Team


No, right now I want a dd lynch. I could just as easily accuse you of supporting a no lynch because you didn't join me. In fact, you had your vote on a candidate that obviously wasn't going to get lynched until I asked you and virus to do something. (I am guilty of the same thing, but at least I'm not getting on a high horse about it.) The only thing I have done to earn this attention is the fact that I happen to be around near the deadline and actually contributing to the thread. The other people who aren't here and aren't posting can just as easily be accused of "wanting a no lynch," you are just taking this out on me because it's convenient.StorrZerg wrote:i want you dead cause your defending the lynch of someone when we have no chance of lynching anyone else. Because you want a no lynch.
Did you even read my explanation?I want colton dead for using the word "evidence" Since, i personally have no idea how "mafia kill people" so him using the word "evidence" is super sketchy
Did you even read my posts? I never said that I didn't want you lynched, and I made some pretty negative comments about your gameplay earlier in the day. I also suggested that your trigger happiness is going to be pretty bad for town since you're pretty damn likely to hit a townie tonight.Also cause you don't want me lynched

You were threatening to lynch dd if he didn't claim. Then you claimed when people started voting for you, and we never actually got dd's claim.When i had voted virus, colton only had 2 votes. So you can't really use that as a reason either.
I've got no idea why people are doing that. The only thing dd has posted that has a chance of hinting at a softclaim is his stuttering remark. I have no idea how to interpret it, so his "softclaim" means zero to me.Secondly you said you want a lynch on dd5. Dd5 has "claimed" he softed hard at a role. So either you could explain why his soft is bad, and why he is scummy, instead you haven't. Since i assume thats a large reason why people are "backing off him"
You did not use the word evidence. You hinted at a similar concept related to what could be found on a person's computer.Regarding "evidence" i used that word, there is no indication from flavor that i can find that indicates that as a reason.
Here is what I posted in that game:ANd again, i prove my point. In our strike wolf mafia game, you made really compelling case for why vig was a good lynch based on role. your not this game
That sentiment has been echoed in the comments I made so far today. There are many differences between that game and this one such that you are not presently at the top of my lynch list, but that does not mean I have suddenly changed perspectives on the issue.Now, regarding virus. Suppose we don't lynch him. Statistically, if we ask him to use his one-shot vig, he's going to hit town and then we've traded a power role for a known VT, which mafia will then not target any longer, making him useless to us except as a vote. The problem is, if he is mafia, mafia will just direct their NK to someone and virus will claim it was his one shot, and then he's "confirmed" as town which is a bad situation for us to be in. Alternatively, if he waits and really is town, then mafia will likely just kill him now anyway.
Now, suppose we do lynch him. If he flips mafia, great. If he flips town, then we've got a problem because we'll lose a second townie at night. One minor redemption is that we could always analyze the votes today for mafia.
This makes this a tough proposition; there's potentially bad results for town in either case. I feel that lynching virus is slightly better on balance because the prospect of having him confirmed as town when he's really not is a very scary one in the long term. I think this is just the price you pay for a claim like he's given. If he's town, it sucks for him, but we have to worry about what's best for the town. So, vote virus
StorrZerg wrote:so flavor. Im the IT guy, basically i know everyone's dirty little secrets. cause yall be terrible with computers. (well not yet, but i can get that information, and thats how i can kill someone/fire them)


StorrZerg wrote:well im going to hell
vote colton
Well it seems a good thing to double check my counting, but do you honestly expect me to answer that question?crasp wrote:Would maybe check streaker caculator before I started looking for a double voter.![]()
Is there a double voter in the game Streak?
well im going to hell

Why is mets not dead.StorrZerg wrote:FIRE Metsfanmax
He certainly thought he was.Metsfanmax wrote:Have fun y'all.

Please reread entire page.crasp wrote:Why is mets not dead.StorrZerg wrote:FIRE MetsfanmaxHe certainly thought he was.Metsfanmax wrote:Have fun y'all.
Got it. Apologies.Streaker wrote:Please reread entire page.crasp wrote:Why is mets not dead.StorrZerg wrote:FIRE MetsfanmaxHe certainly thought he was.Metsfanmax wrote:Have fun y'all.

shit happens, got greedy for a double mafia kill day 1. should have tried harder to convince mets to vote. (at very least threaten to shoot him if he didn't vote)Iron Butterfly wrote:lol what a trip.My last post I was clueless (skimmed) thinking we were still arguing about lynch or no lynch.
Vigging the jail keeper not good. Stupid move actually Storr. Proof that just because one believes something does not make it true. I do not give a crap...day one IS a crap shoot.
