Moderator: Community Team
and so it goes -saxitoxin wrote:French interventionist policy destroyed the buffer that existed between it and the Salafist phenomenon. As a result, instead of this battle being fought in the desert, it will be fought in the streets of Paris. Saif warned Sarkozy what he had done in 2011: "you people have no idea what you have just unleashed." France's chickens are coming home to roost.
French law enforcement officers have been told to erase their social media presence and to carry their weapons at all times because sleeper cells have been activated over the last 24 hours in the country ...
http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/10/europe/ch ... index.html
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
_sabotage_ wrote:We have an obviously intelligent French lad saying basically, we don't need to get to the bottom of this. I would think in implementing an appropriate response and prevention, getting to the bottom of it may help.
But due to a rushed onslaught of perception, an unwarranted response will be developed or I should say, further implemented.
The population needs to get better at preparing a response in times of crisis, because governments are brilliant at it and taking excessive advantage of the fact.
An interesting article on the passage of the patriot act:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/terror-and ... 11/5400910
Although a bit long, it's one of the best sentences in the history of the world.That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons.
Thanks I've never heard that explained so clearly. NM about Christianity. I guess I meant yall will need 'something' like that, unless pure nationalism will suffice for a proper civilian defense/raging horde response if the shootings keep happening?betiko wrote:France isn t a christian country. It s a country of laicity. We don t accept proselitsm of any kind and we are dead firm about this. What happened isn t ever going to stop us from saying "yo mama" to them. The vast majority of french muslims understand this.Phatscotty wrote:Sure they have. And now the ancestors of those killed are all like 'Hey, France is weak a fug. They will pay us to overpopulate! Let's bang their brains out!' Collectively/Governmentally, I'm not so sure France has the Gaul to stand up for itself. But then again, perhaps it's time for a Great Re-Awakening of Christianity in France. Don't count out the newest generation.
We will still draw mahomet if we feel like it, we will still negate the veil in public places including public schools, we will still consider islam with the same respect/parody as we do for any other religion. Just find anyone thinking that what was done was justified... This is a disgrace for the "normal" muslim community worldwide.
1.Maybe they had planned to get out of the country imediatly thereafter and needed their IDs in order to do that?GoranZ wrote:Something smells in the attack of Charliе Hebdo.
1. The attackers forgot their ID card in the car they used for the attack. The logical question to be asked is "Why would they need ID card when they are planning to commit a massacre?" maybe they got struck by instant desire to be good citizens.
2. Terrorist didn't had any means of how to enter the building unless someone opened the door(which indeed happen). The logical question to be asked is "What would they have been doing, masked and armed to the teeth, if no one didn't opened the door?"
3. The French president visited the scene of the crime rite after the attack. The logical question to be asked is "Terrorists are on the run, a massacre has been committed, the city is an emergency, no one knows where the terrorist are and french secret service is taking the President to the scene of the crime? Why such big mistake has been done and the life of the President is directly endangered?" Maybe French secret service wanted assassination attempt to the french president. But if that attempt was successful the attackers would have been glorified as saints.
German newspaper Hamburger Morgenpost was attacked last night, probably because it reposted the caricatures made by Charliе Hebdo. No casualties in this attack, only material damage.
Does someone from the west want to divert the public opinion away from the real problems in EU?
GoranZ wrote: 3. The French president visited the scene of the crime rite after the attack. The logical question to be asked is "Terrorists are on the run, a massacre has been committed, the city is an emergency, no one knows where the terrorist are and french secret service is taking the President to the scene of the crime? Why such big mistake has been done and the life of the President is directly endangered?" Maybe French secret service wanted assassination attempt to the french president. But if that attempt was successful the attackers would have been glorified as saints.

Hehehehe... This happen in September 1941, by that time it was obvious that the Germans have already given up from the Battle of Britain and they turned towards their other objectives in Soviet Union.Dukasaur wrote:GoranZ wrote: 3. The French president visited the scene of the crime rite after the attack. The logical question to be asked is "Terrorists are on the run, a massacre has been committed, the city is an emergency, no one knows where the terrorist are and french secret service is taking the President to the scene of the crime? Why such big mistake has been done and the life of the President is directly endangered?" Maybe French secret service wanted assassination attempt to the french president. But if that attempt was successful the attackers would have been glorified as saints.
It's pretty important to show the enemy that one is not cowed by their attacks. This is good politics.
5 more sorrows, 2 plungers and a really bad clogged toilet._sabotage_ wrote:And how many more to come?
IDK, was just asking about France, with total willingness to be corrected if need be. And I didn't say Islamic neighborhoods were nogo zones, I asked about them separately. Are you saying there is no such thing as a ghetto area with high crime rates in Paris? I doubt it's a stretch, even in my country and my state and my city, diverse as it is, we have 'frog town' where it's mostly Asians and that's where their gangs turf lies mostly, hmong got it on lock and Korean's don't go there. I think we might have the largest Somali American community in America as well, Cedar-Riverside. While CRside is black majority, you won't find Prine or Kirby Puckett kickin it there, nor will you find many basketball courts but a ton of soccer fields. The Native Americans have their own couple of square blocks as well...mrswdk wrote:What's all this nonsense about 'Islamic no go zones' in Western European cities? Some expat here said that to me recently as well.


Given that we re the same age, i guess you can understand that as a french 11yo kid in an american school in india at the time, I probably had another version of the story. Stories about the mean Oudaï Hussein, I also remember watching the news where some koweiti kid was telling how some iraki soldiers came to their house and started removing his parent's eyes from their orbit with a spoon in front of him._sabotage_ wrote:I've never condoned anything done by Saddam, for most of his career he was operating for the US. In fact, when Saddam was planning to attack Kuwait he told the US about it and took no feedback to be the go ahead. Little did he know, other plans were afoot.
I haven't tried to blame the police or cartoonists for being victims, but you immediately go that route with my Iraqi self. Somehow he is responsible for Saddam attacking Kuwait so it's all good in your books. Betiko's mind bubble: Sure that Iraqi self suffered, but when he was eleven his dictator attacked a neighbor, so, ya know, well he kind of deserved it.
So Victor Hugo was lying?

Most of the Saddam horror stories (babies pulled out of incubators, prisoners put into meat grinders, etc.) have been debunked and traced to APCO Worldwide and Hill & Knowlton, which were on retainers from the Supreme Ruler of Kuwait.betiko wrote: Given that we re the same age, i guess you can understand that as a french 11yo kid in an american school in india at the time, I probably had another version of the story. Stories about the mean Oudaï Hussein, I also remember watching the news where some koweiti kid was telling how some iraki soldiers came to their house and started removing his parent's eyes from their orbit with a spoon in front of him.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
You didn't had to sabotage him now_sabotage_ wrote:Betiko, I'm not Iraqi
Probably, but then aren't there plenty of white Americans who identify themselves as German-Irish or whatever?Phatscotty wrote:so are the claims total bs, exaggerated, or just a little bit true. One more Q is it true that many French born of Muslims identify with the country their parents or grandparents emigrated from?
Great russian propaganda trying to get the FN in power here, russian banks are financing it. Funny thing is that they put a black anchor girl on that russian news channel now.Phatscotty wrote:so are the claims total bs, exaggerated, or just a little bit true. One more Q is it true that many French born of Muslims identify with the country their parents or grandparents emigrated from? And thanks for kickin your knowledge about the route
