Moderator: Community Team
hayesez wrote:I'll bite here....just tossing out a thought. Do you think that all of the forum archives drive away new posts? tons of stuff has been batted around in the forums. and hopping on and doing a search generally provides a decent answer. I'm guessing this reduces the number of new posts people feel the need to create....
hayesez wrote:Well, perhaps it is the way you treat people then, owenshooter.
I hop on with a legitimate suggestion, and instead of trying to create some dialogue, you choose to be snippy. I'm not overly sensitive about the whole thing, but I can tell you that a lot of people would prefer not to be treated like that and probably would not spend a lot of time in the forums.
Maybe some people do not read what was said 1-5 years ago, but I DO. I have read a lot of the old forums discussing strategy on various maps. Whether written yesterday or five years it is still applicable. And instead of me hopping on and starting a thread asking for advice on a map I haven't played yet, a quick search generally gives me the info I want.
On virtually every thread I see people getting flamed and I think to myself "this is probably why people don't post that much anymore." And that's a shame.
I have not been on CC nearly as long as you have...or as long as a lot of the people on here. I don't remember the glory days of the forums... I'm sure that during days like that you could be sarcastic, and belittling, and snippy, and all of that stuff....and people probably enjoyed it and knew that it was just good old ribbing. But in order to get to that point again, you have to get people to the forum and then ENGAGE THEM.
hayesez wrote:On virtually every thread I see people getting flamed and I think to myself "this is probably why people don't post that much anymore." And that's a shame.
hayesez wrote:Well, perhaps it is the way you treat people then, owenshooter.
I hop on with a legitimate suggestion, and instead of trying to create some dialogue, you choose to be snippy. I'm not overly sensitive about the whole thing, but I can tell you that a lot of people would prefer not to be treated like that and probably would not spend a lot of time in the forums.
Maybe some people do not read what was said 1-5 years ago, but I DO. I have read a lot of the old forums discussing strategy on various maps. Whether written yesterday or five years it is still applicable. And instead of me hopping on and starting a thread asking for advice on a map I haven't played yet, a quick search generally gives me the info I want.
On virtually every thread I see people getting flamed and I think to myself "this is probably why people don't post that much anymore." And that's a shame.
I have not been on CC nearly as long as you have...or as long as a lot of the people on here. I don't remember the glory days of the forums... I'm sure that during days like that you could be sarcastic, and belittling, and snippy, and all of that stuff....and people probably enjoyed it and knew that it was just good old ribbing. But in order to get to that point again, you have to get people to the forum and then ENGAGE THEM.
macbone wrote:I for one wish the Strategy forum were more active. There are so many maps out there without guides, and a lot of the guide writers have left.
hayesez wrote:How does strategy guide writing work? Random21 and I have at least kicked around the idea of writing one for new USA 2.1. Is there a process one goes through to write the guides?
hayesez wrote:Yup, probably pros and cons to the guides. Since I have been playing I have just slowly been learning new maps...it wasn't until the official CC triples tourney came out that I started doing some digging in the forums. We have 19 different maps this round, and I knew that some of them (ie. Das Schloss / Antarctica) had very specific strategies that probably needed to be followed. Searching threw the archives I found several threads on each, and was able to piece together the basic strategy for the maps.
Maybe the archives don't keep a lot of people from posting...and I would never like to see them go, but they have kept me from reaching out for strategy help on some maps.
How does strategy guide writing work? Random21 and I have at least kicked around the idea of writing one for new USA 2.1. Is there a process one goes through to write the guides?
macbone wrote:I don't know if the forum archive keeps people from posting more now, hayesez. The archives do slow down the site, so some of it could be trimmed, certainly. And yeah, if some of the bite in Questions & Answers and Strategy were removed, people would have to ask those questions again, but it seems like we'd lose a lot of good info that way. I for one wish the Strategy forum were more active. There are so many maps out there without guides, and a lot of the guide writers have left.
BigBallinStalin wrote:macbone wrote:I don't know if the forum archive keeps people from posting more now, hayesez. The archives do slow down the site, so some of it could be trimmed, certainly. And yeah, if some of the bite in Questions & Answers and Strategy were removed, people would have to ask those questions again, but it seems like we'd lose a lot of good info that way. I for one wish the Strategy forum were more active. There are so many maps out there without guides, and a lot of the guide writers have left.
Why would anyone throw away their advantage in a map for practically zero return?
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users