Moderator: Tournament Directors
Today! Sorry, I've been absent for a very long time.Tur_Doka wrote:when is the second round?


I think you're seeing it wrong, mate. I have it 0-1 for you, Tulsa, not Boston (Edgeone).zips5000 wrote:I think you have the win/loss wrong for my game vs edgeone ... he never joined, yet you have him as winning?!?
Thanks.

Yup, you're right. I posted your game results well but messed up your standings by accident. I'm sorry. It's taken care of! And yes, I'm aware of that. I'll drop those games as well.Lindax wrote:You're showing me as 3 played, 3 lost, however I won one game, so it's 2 lost, 1 won.
Also, Colorado didn't join the round 4 game: Game 14957672
Lx






Not really, mate. If I were to rematch, I would have to keep doing that all thoughout the tournament, specially in the big ones. I would be more prone to make mistakes and it would transform the tournament structure into something much weirder than my usual tournaments. I prefer to always apply the same rule and not make modifications. Sometimes it will help some people, but hey... Conquer Club IS a game largely influenced by luck. So are my tournaments. You might be awarded the arguable luck of winning a game because your opponent is not around.Buba wrote:Why keep putting the players that are out of the tournament in games? There are 5....can you just rematch some games so people do not get automatic wins?



Hey there lanceeee. You are correct, the positions are mixed. But don't worry, because: 1) If you notice, the last field - pos(div) - notifies me that you ended the divisional games above The Netherlands with the same points (AKA you won the game between you two). And 2) this is only for 7 played games. I already have it updated in my excel file for the 8th round and in here the mistake is corrected. I will post the update now.lanceeee wrote:Hey JohnAarson,
How do you have me behind The Nederlands? We are tied in the division and I beat him head to head.
Lance




And what about the fact that Denver only played 5 out of 9 games? The other games must have been won by forfeits. That's 4 wins by forfeits, against my to 2 wins by forfeits.JohnAarson wrote:Hey there lanceeee. You are correct, the positions are mixed. But don't worry, because: 1) If you notice, the last field - pos(div) - notifies me that you ended the divisional games above The Netherlands with the same points (AKA you won the game between you two). And 2) this is only for 7 played games. I already have it updated in my excel file for the 8th round and in here the mistake is corrected. I will post the update now.lanceeee wrote:Hey JohnAarson,
How do you have me behind The Nederlands? We are tied in the division and I beat him head to head.
Lance
Lindax wrote:And what about the fact that Denver only played 5 out of 9 games? The other games must have been won by forfeits. That's 4 wins by forfeits, against my to 2 wins by forfeits.JohnAarson wrote:Hey there lanceeee. You are correct, the positions are mixed. But don't worry, because: 1) If you notice, the last field - pos(div) - notifies me that you ended the divisional games above The Netherlands with the same points (AKA you won the game between you two). And 2) this is only for 7 played games. I already have it updated in my excel file for the 8th round and in here the mistake is corrected. I will post the update now.lanceeee wrote:Hey JohnAarson,
How do you have me behind The Nederlands? We are tied in the division and I beat him head to head.
Lance
I think I should be in 2nd position.
Lx