Moderator: Community Team
LMAO!!!GoranZ wrote:After losing everything that can be lost... France decided not to deliver 2 Mistrals to Russia for which it will have to pay $3 bil. for braking the deal.
On top of everything it seems that no one is trusting France any more so India threatened to cancel its $22 bil. deal for 126 fighter jets. That will most-likely close Dassault Aviation

Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880

Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
Tupolev still makes planes, although there has never been a good plane.*saxitoxin wrote:Actually, for different reasons, this was also a brilliant strategic move by the U.S. After Dassault goes bankrupt, all the western Dassault customers, like Portugal and ... France, will have to buy from Boeing and Lockheed.
So both Putin and Obama scored a victory. Hollande turned out to be the useful idiot.
The deal isn't over yet. Russia needs to comply.Hollande set two conditions for delivery: the observation of a ceasefire in Ukraine and a political agreement between Moscow and Kiev.
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis

No it doesn't. Those terms were not part of the contract between Russia and Dassault and are therefore of no relevance to the deal.DaGip wrote:The deal isn't over yet. Russia needs to comply.Hollande set two conditions for delivery: the observation of a ceasefire in Ukraine and a political agreement between Moscow and Kiev.

Yeah, they should just show Kim Jong-Un a few clips from It's A Wondeful Life.betiko wrote:People should buy flowers instead of fighter jets to solve diplomatic conflicts
British defence secretary Michael Fallon, in fact, recently told TOI that the Eurofighter was fully ready to step in to fulfil India's requirements if negotiations for the Rafale failed. With IAF down to 34 fighter squadrons, when at least 44 are required, IAF has identified the MMRCA project as its "topmost priority" for the Modi government. India is also pushing Russia, ahead of President Vladimir Putin's visit here early next month, to come back with a plan to substantially reduce the delivery timeframe for the stealth fifth-generation fighter aircraft (FGFA) if it wants to stitch-up the futuristic project by next year.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/indi ... 288396.cms
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
It does if it wants the boats. It doesn't make much sense that if Russia starts making acts of war against Europe that a European country starts selling arms to its enemy? Contracts are worthless when the vendee attacks the vendor. Of course, you could argue that Ukraine isn't a member of NATO; however, the Ukraine has a close partnership with NATO without being a member. I think the popularity of the Ukraine joining NATO has risen greatly among the Ukrainians since Putin's illegal invasion (under the pretext of protecting "Russians").mrswdk wrote:No it doesn't. Those terms were not part of the contract between Russia and Dassault and are therefore of no relevance to the deal.DaGip wrote:The deal isn't over yet. Russia needs to comply.Hollande set two conditions for delivery: the observation of a ceasefire in Ukraine and a political agreement between Moscow and Kiev.
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis

Dassault is the company that makes jetfighters (and business jets and secret defense programs). It has nothing to do with the company that does the ships for russia wdk, just saying.DaGip wrote:It does if it wants the boats. It doesn't make much sense that if Russia starts making acts of war against Europe that a European country starts selling arms to its enemy? Contracts are worthless when the vendee attacks the vendor. Of course, you could argue that Ukraine isn't a member of NATO; however, the Ukraine has a close partnership with NATO without being a member. I think the popularity of the Ukraine joining NATO has risen greatly among the Ukrainians since Putin's illegal invasion (under the pretext of protecting "Russians").mrswdk wrote:No it doesn't. Those terms were not part of the contract between Russia and Dassault and are therefore of no relevance to the deal.DaGip wrote:The deal isn't over yet. Russia needs to comply.Hollande set two conditions for delivery: the observation of a ceasefire in Ukraine and a political agreement between Moscow and Kiev.
So yes, Russia needs to comply if it wants the boats, otherwise she can suck an Ortolan Bunting!

As far as I know Russia is buying them for money... So there is no need to comply for anything... $3 bil in return is quite good dealDaGip wrote:So yes, Russia needs to comply if it wants the boats, otherwise she can suck an Ortolan Bunting!
Indians are smart enough... Thrust has a lot when it comes to trade.betiko wrote:Dassault is the company that makes jetfighters (and business jets and secret defense programs). It has nothing to do with the company that does the ships for russia wdk, just saying.
Indians are smart enough to understand the situation and might use it as a leverage to get a better deal with the french or whoever they will finally sign the contract with.
Unless they plan on invading pakistan before the jetfighters are ready, I doubt tha they are worried that france would decide to finally not deliver the planes.
It's pretty obvious that france would have an ethical problem to sell and deliver boats to a country that is doing something they are officially taking position against. The boats were signed in 2011 and the situation was obviously different at the time.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
It's 1.2 billion euros or 1.7 billion dollars not 3.GoranZ wrote:As far as I know Russia is buying them for money... So there is no need to comply for anything... $3 bil in return is quite good dealDaGip wrote:So yes, Russia needs to comply if it wants the boats, otherwise she can suck an Ortolan Bunting!
Indians are smart enough... Thrust has a lot when it comes to trade.betiko wrote:Dassault is the company that makes jetfighters (and business jets and secret defense programs). It has nothing to do with the company that does the ships for russia wdk, just saying.
Indians are smart enough to understand the situation and might use it as a leverage to get a better deal with the french or whoever they will finally sign the contract with.
Unless they plan on invading pakistan before the jetfighters are ready, I doubt tha they are worried that france would decide to finally not deliver the planes.
It's pretty obvious that france would have an ethical problem to sell and deliver boats to a country that is doing something they are officially taking position against. The boats were signed in 2011 and the situation was obviously different at the time.

On top of the refund, doesn't France have to pay a $300 million fine? If I were Russia, I'd take the $300M profit and send it straight to the Donetsk.betiko wrote:It's 1.2 billion euros or 1.7 billion dollars not 3.GoranZ wrote:As far as I know Russia is buying them for money... So there is no need to comply for anything... $3 bil in return is quite good dealDaGip wrote:So yes, Russia needs to comply if it wants the boats, otherwise she can suck an Ortolan Bunting!
Indians are smart enough... Thrust has a lot when it comes to trade.betiko wrote:Dassault is the company that makes jetfighters (and business jets and secret defense programs). It has nothing to do with the company that does the ships for russia wdk, just saying.
Indians are smart enough to understand the situation and might use it as a leverage to get a better deal with the french or whoever they will finally sign the contract with.
Unless they plan on invading pakistan before the jetfighters are ready, I doubt tha they are worried that france would decide to finally not deliver the planes.
It's pretty obvious that france would have an ethical problem to sell and deliver boats to a country that is doing something they are officially taking position against. The boats were signed in 2011 and the situation was obviously different at the time.
I don t know if you meant thrust or trust, and if you meant thrust i got to say i don t understand what you mean. My answer is based on the fact that you meant trust, if it s not the case well sorry about that.
Russia is the one who broke our trust in the first place invading ukraine. We are not going to help them to continue such endeavours.
Now if the indian government is smart, they can ask for the 2 helicopter carriers for free, only worth 1.7 billion and we sign the rafale deal for 22 billions. Huge win for india, a big f*ck you to putin and france makes a point.
I heard a funny thing, there was a poll on a french online newspaper asking if france should sell the ships or not. There was 78% in favour and people on foreign media relayed the information. The thing is that 60% of the traffic came from russian IPs trolling the poll, so the french newspaper had to remove it!
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
Yeah sure, that s why it all went all so smooth. Just go tell that to all the protesters who got murdered you smart person. Sure, many ukranians are pro russians. But the % depends on the regions, and the way it happened was anything but democratic.shickingbrits wrote:Ukraine was pro-Russia, try again Betiko.

Maybe putin could shovel it up his ass, he might reconsider gay rights in his country if he likes it.saxitoxin wrote:
On top of the refund, doesn't France have to pay a $300 million fine? If I were Russia, I'd take the $300M profit and send it straight to the Donetsk.
India just finished building their own aircraft carrier (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/INS_Vikrant_(2013), I doubt they'd want the cost of having to operate two more. I read somewhere that some people want Canada to buy the Mistrals. Canada can barely sail the ships it has right now - it usually has to get towed to their destination by the U.S. Navy. They'd be useful for Australia maybe but there's no way they could afford to operate both of them. They're probably too big for Japan to legally (?) operate. Given Brazilian-Russian friendship, I doubt Brazil would take them.
Betiko - maybe if France is nice they can get Macedonia to take them. GoranZ - what's the biggest lake in Macedonia?

Having one anything carrier is like having a gf with only one breast. People will only want both or none.betiko wrote:Maybe putin could shovel it up his ass, he might reconsider gay rights in his country if he likes it.saxitoxin wrote:
On top of the refund, doesn't France have to pay a $300 million fine? If I were Russia, I'd take the $300M profit and send it straight to the Donetsk.
India just finished building their own aircraft carrier (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/INS_Vikrant_(2013), I doubt they'd want the cost of having to operate two more. I read somewhere that some people want Canada to buy the Mistrals. Canada can barely sail the ships it has right now - it usually has to get towed to their destination by the U.S. Navy. They'd be useful for Australia maybe but there's no way they could afford to operate both of them. They're probably too big for Japan to legally (?) operate. Given Brazilian-Russian friendship, I doubt Brazil would take them.
Betiko - maybe if France is nice they can get Macedonia to take them. GoranZ - what's the biggest lake in Macedonia?
They are not aircraft carriers, they are helicopter carriers. Hey there s two of them, I would sell 1 to the canadians and 1 to the australians with a discount, just because they are handsome.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
France will have to pay 3 for braking the contractbetiko wrote:It's 1.2 billion euros or 1.7 billion dollars not 3.
auto correct... wrong wordbetiko wrote:I don t know if you meant thrust or trust, and if you meant thrust i got to say i don t understand what you mean.
Typically French behavior... India will come to take those ships but will come with Russian crew, just enough to make you guys brake another contractbetiko wrote:Now if the indian government is smart, they can ask for the 2 helicopter carriers for free, only worth 1.7 billion and we sign the rafale deal for 22 billions. Huge win for india, a big f*ck you to putin and france makes a point.
That would be Lake Ohrid... Deep enough but I'm not sure if environmentalist will allow "rust factory" in World Heritage site. If it was German steel, maybe we could have arrange it, but for French nah.saxitoxin wrote:Betiko - maybe if France is nice they can get Macedonia to take them. GoranZ - what's the biggest lake in Macedonia?
I presume saxy is more teasing with betiko then implying the carriers to end up in my country... after all I wonder if anyone would want to see french ships in the middle of the oldest lake in Europe and one of the oldest lakes on the Planet.shickingbrits wrote:You mean the protestors funded by the US and shot by the CIA? That's a convincing argument that a country who voted in a pro-Russian leader is anti-Russian.