on the other hand keylor navas had a lot of action and did great so far. he might be tired but he's also on fire.
it will be interesting if we get to penalties.
Moderator: Community Team


Brazil vs. Germany on Tuesday.oVo wrote:Holland & Germany both look strong, but it won't be easy.
When are the semis played?
I am a monkey prophet.DoomYoshi wrote:This is a pretty successful thread, despite the extensive boycotting that happened during it's inception.

Just like the entertainment shows, such as in Hunger Games movienietzsche wrote:This WC has put in evidence that the referees need help. I've always been against of the idea because it would slow down the game but you cannot help but think that FIFA can decide who wins a match.
It certainly was interesting, with the Netherlands subbing out their keeper in the 120th minute. And what a decision that turned out to be! He looked like he wasn't guessing which side, like most keepers do. He was straight-up reacting to the shots.DiM wrote:costa rica hasn't landed a single shot on goal so far, so basically cillessen might get the chance to stop a shot only at the penalties.some might say he's well rested so he'll do well.
on the other hand keylor navas had a lot of action and did great so far. he might be tired but he's also on fire.
it will be interesting if we get to penalties.
his stats are not impressive btw.. in the last season, he stopped 1/12 in EPL with New Castle... I'm not sure, but it seems to be more psychological than practical.. Who knows.. It still takes a great courage and strong character to make such a decision.. Imagine if the sub keeper failed and Holland lost? Media would have fucked the coach up lolTimminz wrote:It certainly was interesting, with the Netherlands subbing out their keeper in the 120th minute. And what a decision that turned out to be! He looked like he wasn't guessing which side, like most keepers do. He was straight-up reacting to the shots.DiM wrote:costa rica hasn't landed a single shot on goal so far, so basically cillessen might get the chance to stop a shot only at the penalties.some might say he's well rested so he'll do well.
on the other hand keylor navas had a lot of action and did great so far. he might be tired but he's also on fire.
it will be interesting if we get to penalties.

doesn't it spice things up though? I think that 95% of ref mistakes are genuine though and that they are not being dishonnest. they try to do their job and it's a damn difficult one. football without ref mistakes wouldn't be as passionate.nietzsche wrote:This WC has put in evidence that the referees need help. I've always been against of the idea because it would slow down the game but you cannot help but think that FIFA can decide who wins a match.

This is something that is done very often in handball. It's the first time I see it in football and I think it's an absolutely brilliant idea. The guy comes from the bench and knows it's pretty much the only world cup minutes he will be playing, and that it's the most important thing a keeper can do. Van Gaal probably told him from the start of the world cup that he will play penaltys and the guy might have been 100% focused and training on this and analyzing each player while the number 1 keeper practissed more regular things. The fact of comming in 100% fresh mentally on the pitch is awesome. I hear lots of people criticize his trash talking to the shooters, I thought it was brilliant, I love it.Timminz wrote:It certainly was interesting, with the Netherlands subbing out their keeper in the 120th minute. And what a decision that turned out to be! He looked like he wasn't guessing which side, like most keepers do. He was straight-up reacting to the shots.DiM wrote:costa rica hasn't landed a single shot on goal so far, so basically cillessen might get the chance to stop a shot only at the penalties.some might say he's well rested so he'll do well.
on the other hand keylor navas had a lot of action and did great so far. he might be tired but he's also on fire.
it will be interesting if we get to penalties.

in the final minutes of the extra time krul was on the sideline practicing penalty moves with the goalkeeper coach.Pirlo wrote:his stats are not impressive btw.. in the last season, he stopped 1/12 in EPL with New Castle... I'm not sure, but it seems to be more psychological than practical.. Who knows.. It still takes a great courage and strong character to make such a decision.. Imagine if the sub keeper failed and Holland lost? Media would have fucked the coach up lolTimminz wrote:It certainly was interesting, with the Netherlands subbing out their keeper in the 120th minute. And what a decision that turned out to be! He looked like he wasn't guessing which side, like most keepers do. He was straight-up reacting to the shots.DiM wrote:costa rica hasn't landed a single shot on goal so far, so basically cillessen might get the chance to stop a shot only at the penalties.some might say he's well rested so he'll do well.
on the other hand keylor navas had a lot of action and did great so far. he might be tired but he's also on fire.
it will be interesting if we get to penalties.
extremely passionate is not necessarily a good thing, especially when we're talking about negative emotions like those that come after referee mistakes.betiko wrote:doesn't it spice things up though? I think that 95% of ref mistakes are genuine though and that they are not being dishonnest. they try to do their job and it's a damn difficult one. football without ref mistakes wouldn't be as passionate.
Also FIFA doesn't need more than 2% of intentional mistakes... only 1 "mistake" can be enough to decide a match.DiM wrote:extremely passionate is not necessarily a good thing, especially when we're talking about negative emotions like those that come after referee mistakes.betiko wrote:doesn't it spice things up though? I think that 95% of ref mistakes are genuine though and that they are not being dishonnest. they try to do their job and it's a damn difficult one. football without ref mistakes wouldn't be as passionate.
football has the capability to create extreme emotions on its own, it doesn't need referee mistakes "to spice things up".
i do agree that most mistakes are unintentional, and yes, it's a very difficult job to react in milliseconds and take important decisions that might alter the course of a game. but this is precisely the reason why i'm a strong advocate for video replays. having the help of a replay will take some of the pressure from the shoulders of the refs and reduce a lot of the mistakes being done. not to mention it will almost completely eliminate the suspicions of matches being fixed with the help of the refs.
Dukasaur wrote:No, it's Coulombia. It's named after Charles Augustin de Coulomb. It's so named because the combination of caffeine and cocaine is electrifying!Gillipig wrote:WRONG! Kolombia it is. Named after the great european explorer Kolombus. Get it right!trevor33 wrote:It's spelt COLOMBIA. Can we try and get that right for the rest of the thread please?
And that match sucked... although I did miss the first 55 mins.
+1Pirlo wrote: I'm not a Brazil hater.. I'm just against favoritism.
+1betiko wrote:What a great coaching by van gaal! The main protagonists and superstars of this world cup are... The keepers!
+1Pirlo wrote:Obviously Holland dominated and were better by far... However, there was an evident penalty for Costa Rica. It looked kinda clear that Holland were wanted in semi-finals for a real thrill!
Whoever win the cup now shouldn't be a surprise. Brazil seem to be the weakest and least deserved team now IMO!
+1nietzsche wrote:This WC has put in evidence that the referees need help. I've always been against of the idea because it would slow down the game but you cannot help but think that FIFA can decide who wins a match.
Costa Rica should have clearly had a penalty, and Robben was his typical self. Costa Rica's defensive game was strong and they pressed it well. It's a shame that FIFA/refs just want the favourites to go through. There hasn't been a single upset since the groups finished.betiko wrote:This is something that is done very often in handball. It's the first time I see it in football and I think it's an absolutely brilliant idea. The guy comes from the bench and knows it's pretty much the only world cup minutes he will be playing, and that it's the most important thing a keeper can do. Van Gaal probably told him from the start of the world cup that he will play penaltys and the guy might have been 100% focused and training on this and analyzing each player while the number 1 keeper practissed more regular things. The fact of comming in 100% fresh mentally on the pitch is awesome. I hear lots of people criticize his trash talking to the shooters, I thought it was brilliant, I love it.Timminz wrote:It certainly was interesting, with the Netherlands subbing out their keeper in the 120th minute. And what a decision that turned out to be! He looked like he wasn't guessing which side, like most keepers do. He was straight-up reacting to the shots.DiM wrote:costa rica hasn't landed a single shot on goal so far, so basically cillessen might get the chance to stop a shot only at the penalties.some might say he's well rested so he'll do well.
on the other hand keylor navas had a lot of action and did great so far. he might be tired but he's also on fire.
it will be interesting if we get to penalties.

The coach must've seen something during penalty kick practices, probably Krul was amazing at it in practice and had a lot of confidence, while Cillessen probably did not look anywhere near as good. As you said penalty kicks is more about mental state than physical, Krul was probably in a much better mental state at penalties than Cillessen was leading up to the game. Krul looked really really good as well, much better than Navas, who was chanceless on a lot of the penalties, Krul was not chanceless on any of them, he was always there, either close to saving it or saving it. Genius move by the coach, had he not done that who knows what would've happened.Pirlo wrote:his stats are not impressive btw.. in the last season, he stopped 1/12 in EPL with New Castle... I'm not sure, but it seems to be more psychological than practical.. Who knows.. It still takes a great courage and strong character to make such a decision.. Imagine if the sub keeper failed and Holland lost? Media would have fucked the coach up lolTimminz wrote:It certainly was interesting, with the Netherlands subbing out their keeper in the 120th minute. And what a decision that turned out to be! He looked like he wasn't guessing which side, like most keepers do. He was straight-up reacting to the shots.DiM wrote:costa rica hasn't landed a single shot on goal so far, so basically cillessen might get the chance to stop a shot only at the penalties.some might say he's well rested so he'll do well.
on the other hand keylor navas had a lot of action and did great so far. he might be tired but he's also on fire.
it will be interesting if we get to penalties.
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE