Moderator: Community Team
So stating a historically prevalent trend is a scum tell?mtamburini wrote:Arms are shaking cant control myself. I feel like an aggro tambo is coming.
Town roleblocker is interesting claim, I feel like pressuring Tails for his comments about days gonna end in a NL anyway, I say f*ck that shit lets lynch some scum.
VOTE TAILS
As per some of the talk about the setup, who really gives a shit. Paranoia talk about 3rd parties will only cost us the game as town. Focus on lynching mafia the third party role, if there is one, will have to eventually reveal themselves.
As more claims appear and role flips happen I think a discussion of "setup" will be more important as we can discuss possible balance roles and such. Generally with a Roleblocker for town means there is some decent power roles for the mafia team. No need to discuss what they are from what I hear half of you hear have been playing for a long time, and well for the newer players take this as a learning experience.
Seriously though lynch Tails. Hes not having fun.
Jak kinda on my radar for that whole pirate hooker joke I made, it felt like an early pocket attempt on me as well as an easy way to come in and try and act as a towny mediator.
Everyone else hasnt really given me anything to be like OMFG THIS SOB IS TOWN.
Charm asking me to come out and say stuff not sure how to read that. What do you think of what I said so far?
lol. Talk to me when you've got more than a handful of games under your belt.mtamburini wrote:Of what value does your statement of historically prevalent trend help move this game along in a positive direction? None. It may of even killed the flow of chat in here. And Im here to bring it back.
Im currently looking for my can of woopass to open and go ham on you. Once I find it I will become aggro tambo.
Get your popcorn ready.
And yet I'm now one of the most active if not most active poster.jak111 wrote:*Noms on skittles* Skittles are statisically proven to be better than popcorn.
Anyway, my vote is staying, Many people are not contributing that much, but Tails, it's time to care about Day 1, else you wont make it to Day 2 with that attitude.
*gets popcorn, settles on couch, gets ready for mtam to go all crazy*mtamburini wrote:Of what value does your statement of historically prevalent trend help move this game along in a positive direction? None. It may of even killed the flow of chat in here. And Im here to bring it back.
Im currently looking for my can of woopass to open and go ham on you. Once I find it I will become aggro tambo.
Get your popcorn ready.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
DAFUQ are you talking about? Im going after him because he was being a buzzkill. Do you need to re read one more time? Time to lynch scum people. TIME TO BREAK SOME METApancakemix wrote:Mtam, your first few posts are basically to the same end as Tails' post. You blow off the inactivity talk, then go after Tails for doing the same. Sounds sketchy to me.
All I hear is condescending because YOU think I dont have a lot of games under my belt. WUT DUH FUQ you know about the games I've played BOIIIIIII.TA1LGUNN3R wrote:lol. Talk to me when you've got more than a handful of games under your belt.mtamburini wrote:Of what value does your statement of historically prevalent trend help move this game along in a positive direction? None. It may of even killed the flow of chat in here. And Im here to bring it back.
Im currently looking for my can of woopass to open and go ham on you. Once I find it I will become aggro tambo.
Get your popcorn ready.
And yet I'm now one of the most active if not most active poster.jak111 wrote:*Noms on skittles* Skittles are statisically proven to be better than popcorn.
Anyway, my vote is staying, Many people are not contributing that much, but Tails, it's time to care about Day 1, else you wont make it to Day 2 with that attitude.
Also, stop with the empty ultimatums. It's not endearing.
-Tails
There is the MTAM I know and love to play mafia with!!mtamburini wrote:Arms are shaking cant control myself. I feel like an aggro tambo is coming.
Town roleblocker is interesting claim, I feel like pressuring Tails for his comments about days gonna end in a NL anyway, I say f*ck that shit lets lynch some scum.
VOTE TAILS
As per some of the talk about the setup, who really gives a shit. Paranoia talk about 3rd parties will only cost us the game as town. Focus on lynching mafia the third party role, if there is one, will have to eventually reveal themselves.
As more claims appear and role flips happen I think a discussion of "setup" will be more important as we can discuss possible balance roles and such. Generally with a Roleblocker for town means there is some decent power roles for the mafia team. No need to discuss what they are from what I hear half of you hear have been playing for a long time, and well for the newer players take this as a learning experience.
Seriously though lynch Tails. Hes not having fun.
Jak kinda on my radar for that whole pirate hooker joke I made, it felt like an early pocket attempt on me as well as an easy way to come in and try and act as a towny mediator.
Everyone else hasnt really given me anything to be like OMFG THIS SOB IS TOWN.
Charm asking me to come out and say stuff not sure how to read that. What do you think of what I said so far?

Is that long ago since I last posted??? Didn't realise.Nebuchadnezer wrote: It looks as though Jonty is gone, so we could always go with the ever popular "lynch the inactive"...that always works.
If I sound condescending then I apologize, but your refusal to drop the matter (which is essentially nada...make that less than nada) and subsequent bravado (something about a can of whoop ass?) leads me to believe you didn't listen to a word I said. The absurdity of the situation is that I volunteered the information that I was inactive, and yet somebody went off of that as if it was still valid. How asinine is that?mtamburini wrote:All I hear is condescending because YOU think I dont have a lot of games under my belt. WUT DUH FUQ you know about the games I've played BOIIIIIII.TA1LGUNN3R wrote:lol. Talk to me when you've got more than a handful of games under your belt.mtamburini wrote:Of what value does your statement of historically prevalent trend help move this game along in a positive direction? None. It may of even killed the flow of chat in here. And Im here to bring it back.
Im currently looking for my can of woopass to open and go ham on you. Once I find it I will become aggro tambo.
Get your popcorn ready.
And yet I'm now one of the most active if not most active poster.jak111 wrote:*Noms on skittles* Skittles are statisically proven to be better than popcorn.
Anyway, my vote is staying, Many people are not contributing that much, but Tails, it's time to care about Day 1, else you wont make it to Day 2 with that attitude.
Also, stop with the empty ultimatums. It's not endearing.
-Tails
You claim you with more games played, supposedly, that I cant talk to you?
What are you some sort of God that I have to bow down to you?
Lynch him now.
Sorry, missed this earlier. I meant that yes, it's kinda silly to screech out for a lynch based on day one inactivity when many posters usually post the bare minimum on that day, and that to keep driving away at it is just reaching.Nebuchadnezer wrote:So you suspect anyone who has been promoting activity and trying to get everyone to participate? Please explain how you move the day further along without participation? Or are you referring to if it were day two, then it's an issue for you? To just fos everyone who has been talking is bad form in my mind.TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Charm, jak, neb. Anyone who wishes to press the activity issue (which is now a null point). If this were a day further along I'd agree with them. As it's day one it's just them reaching for straws.pancakemix wrote:Well, don't leave us hanging. If you have suspects, throw out some names.TA1LGUNN3R wrote:And yet I've now got multiple suspects who make mountains out of molehills. Usually scum try harder than town to make cases out of thin air.charm wrote:Well, I say we give MTam 24 hours and if he doesn't show up and say something intelligent, then we lynch him.
As for Tail, he is now on my scum radar being that he posted this bs:Either of then can be lynched as dead weight! IMOTA1LGUNN3R wrote:Blah blah something something day 1.
Get over it.
-Tails
-Tails
Doh! Sorry...get you and Jmac confused. You're still here then...jonty125 wrote:Is that long ago since I last posted??? Didn't realise.Nebuchadnezer wrote: It looks as though Jonty is gone, so we could always go with the ever popular "lynch the inactive"...that always works.
vote charm for sheeping mtam.
Sorry, missed this earlier. I meant that yes, it's kinda silly to screech out for a lynch based on day one inactivity when many posters usually post the bare minimum on that day, and that to keep driving away at it is just reaching.TA1LGUNN3R wrote: So you suspect anyone who has been promoting activity and trying to get everyone to participate? Please explain how you move the day further along without participation? Or are you referring to if it were day two, then it's an issue for you? To just fos everyone who has been talking is bad form in my mind.
If you aren't willing to do the former then the later is basically an empty threat.Nebuchadnezer wrote:So you think I wanted a lynch and not just more activity? My posts and vote were aimed at getting the inactive too talk. It felt like only the of us were posting for a few days. I wouldn't lynch on inactivity, but I will pressure to get participation.
I'm fairly sure I was here firstNebuchadnezer wrote:Doh! Sorry...get you and Jmac confused. You're still here then...jonty125 wrote:Is that long ago since I last posted??? Didn't realise.Nebuchadnezer wrote: It looks as though Jonty is gone, so we could always go with the ever popular "lynch the inactive"...that always works.
vote charm for sheeping mtam.
So in other words your relying on probabilities and luck rather then an actual bonified case?jak111 wrote:It's not so much an inactive case anymore Tails, but it's how you replied to the case of not really giving a shit about Day 1 at all.
3/12 people in this game are mafia with 1-2 third parties. So with these numbers 4-5/12 people are anti-town. That's a 33-41% chance of getting a non-townie dead with a random lynch Day 1. With an 8.3% chance that each person is anti-town.
Right now we have Spiesr's claim on the table of Town Roleblocker (Could be telling the truth about role and be mafia aligned as well).
If we go under the assumption that Spiesr is indeed town and limit our lynch to 11 people. We now have a 36-45% chance of randomly lynching an anti-town person.
But, from everyone but Spiesr's perspective that are town, since you know you're town if we randomly lynched someone of your choice there'd be a 40-50% chance of hitting anti-town.
For me, minus the few town reads I have at the moment I am willing to bet 50-62% chance of Tails being mafia, which is just over half and I am willing to go for it unless something better turns up.

God, you people are dense.jak wrote:It's not so much an inactive case anymore Tails, but it's how you replied to the case of not really giving a shit about Day 1 at all.