Moderator: Community Team
Good point. I was focusing on the noticeable animals, and in particular, the apes and the like because they fed better into my point. I also agree that beyond the genus and species and sub-species level, the system is not very effective.DoomYoshi wrote:Not really... only in megafauna are there any clear lines. From salamanders to birds to insects to plants there are so many taxonomic blurred lines. Even amongst the megafauna, taxonomies are constantly being revised. How many times have pandas switched from being bears to other crap? Raccoons have been considered bears and weasels by various taxonomists over the years. The arbitrary 7-layer taxonomic naming scheme is absolute bullshit also. Over the years, scientists have twisted their own heads in their asses by introducing subspecies, superfamilies and so ad infinitum.denominator wrote:
Beyond that, there are broader groups of organisms in the genus, family, class, order, phylum, and kingdom categories. The lines between the categories is fairly well determined in extant species. It gets much blurrier in extinct species.
You didn't bother to answer any of my questions. You only answered with what "kinds" aren't - represented by their skulls.universalchiro wrote:Denominayor, skull formations is not the defining feature to determine kind, there is also skin, hair, DNA, mind, hormones, reproduction, communication, locomotion, joint formation, habitat, image, characteristics(personality), social, diet, etc. So to show only 1 of 100s of features is insufficient.
I am not sure you have any idea what you are talking about. Secondary growth refers to plants differentiation. I assume you must be referring to Secondary sex characteristics which has absolutely nothing to do with the above skulls.universalchiro wrote:But I'll still address your skulls with this, since man once lived 900+ years, I would expect secondary growth sites to be pronounced versus mankind that lived 90 years though they both are 100% human. Remember similarities of creatures just as easily represents same creator as same ancestor.


warmonger1981 wrote:Every man has his own world. He dwells in the midst of his little universe as the lord and ruler of his constituent parts of himself. Sometimes he is a wise king, devoting his life to the needs of his subjects, but more often he is a tyrant, imposing many forms of injustice upon his vassals, either through ignorance of their needs or thoughtlessness concerning the ultimate disaster that he is bringing upon himself. Man's body is a living temple and he is a high priest, placed there to keep the House of the Lord in order. The temples of the ancients were patterned after the human form.

Natty dread, I feel your pain and rage. Wow you came with lots of anger. Take a deep breath, be calm and tell me why you believe the Bible is worthy only to wipe your butt. Don't tell me about bad "Christians" or messed up churches that just want peoples money in a Ponzi scheme where the pastor flies in private jet stream to speak. For humans are flawed. So let's focus on the Bible, tell me.universalchiro wrote:There is a requirement of trillions of genetic random unguided mutations (evolutionary process) that has allegedly increased the information in the genome in evolution. Yet this is not observable. Not even the top evolutionist has observable evidence and nor do you. So stop pretending your faith in evolution is fact, stop deluding yourself.
So all these people have incorrect interpretations of the Bible, but yours is more accurate?universalchiro wrote: Natty dread, I feel your pain and rage. Wow you came with lots of anger. Take a deep breath, be calm and tell me why you believe the Bible is worthy only to wipe your butt. Don't tell me about bad "Christians" or messed up churches that just want peoples money in a Ponzi scheme where the pastor flies in private jet stream to speak. For humans are flawed. So let's focus on the Bible, tell me.
I wouldn't wipe my butt in your bible unless it comes triple quilted. I have standards.universalchiro wrote:Natty dread, I feel your pain and rage. Wow you came with lots of anger. Take a deep breath, be calm and tell me why you believe the Bible is worthy only to wipe your butt.

Hmm, no dude. I'm just keeping it real. No bravado - I'm just telling you things someone should tell you... You're the one who's gathering your toys and going home when the going gets too tough for you to handle.universalchiro wrote:Okay Natty, you sound like an angry 14 year old that doesnt have an adult to monitor your bravado over the Internet. You're on quick and permanent sleep mode. This is our first and last communication.

0 living worshiperswarmonger1981 wrote:Ancient temples don't need to evolve. They are eternal. Look at the pyramid, sanctuary at Karnak
there are living worshipers(for now)warmonger1981 wrote:St.Peters Church at Rome.
Yes, I have said what a lovely sunset. But I don't mean it literally. How can you not take that one quote literally but arbitrarily decide to take all the other quotes literally?universalchiro wrote:DoomY, have you ever said what a lovely sunset? Did you mean the sun stood still, why don't you say what a lovely earth rotation?
Hey i will not quote that ok?natty dread wrote:Hmm, no dude. I'm just keeping it real. No bravado - I'm just telling you things someone should tell you... You're the one who's gathering your toys and going home when the going gets too tough for you to handle.universalchiro wrote:Okay Natty, you sound like an angry 14 year old that doesnt have an adult to monitor your bravado over the Internet. You're on quick and permanent sleep mode. This is our first and last communication.
I'm sure you'll foe me or something equally cowardly, that's fine, shove your head in the sand... because the truth is, you're a scared little boy. You're scared of death, so you cling to the hope that daddy longbeard will swoop down and rescue you to eternal bliss or whatever. And hey, I get it. I've been there... only I grew up, confronted my fears, then died a little and that was the end of it. And the beginning.
So yeah, go ahead and foe me... doesn't matter. Maybe someone will quote me so you can't escape these words... and if not, it doesn't matter either. Because the universe works with or without you.

How many times are you going to tell me this? I highly doubt it's been a year, I had no idea how gullible you were a year ago.universalchiro wrote:Notyou2, sorry dude, you have been foed for a year+.

Yeah DoomYoshi, WHY DON'T YOU SAY "What a lovely earth rotation?" you filthy scalawag.DoomYoshi wrote:Yes, I have said what a lovely sunset. But I don't mean it literally. How can you not take that one quote literally but arbitrarily decide to take all the other quotes literally?universalchiro wrote:DoomY, have you ever said what a lovely sunset? Did you mean the sun stood still, why don't you say what a lovely earth rotation?
the fool on the hill sees the sun going downuniversalchiro wrote:DoomY, have you ever said what a lovely sunset? Did you mean the sun stood still, why don't you say what a lovely earth rotation?
Your language reveals the condition of your heart, a saved person doesn't talk as you do.
universalchiro wrote:Denominator, Thanks for the correction, I edited. The point is still the same.
denominator wrote:Secondary sex characteristics, which has absolutely nothing to do with the above skulls.


Today I saw a mutation that was actually an improvement to the genetic code that gave more information than was there before. Oh wait, never mind. It was just an evolutionist trolling as usual.universalchiro wrote:There are requirements of trillions of genetic random unguided mutations (evolutionary process) that has allegedly increased the information in the genome in evolution. Yet this is not observable. Not even the top evolutionist has observable evidence and nor do you. So stop pretending your faith in evolution is fact, stop deluding yourself.
Do you mean that evolutionists are more evolved genetically speaking?universalchiro wrote:Today I saw a mutation that was actually an improvement to the genetic code that gave more information than was there before. Oh wait, never mind. It was just an evolutionist trolling as usual.universalchiro wrote:There are requirements of trillions of genetic random unguided mutations (evolutionary process) that has allegedly increased the information in the genome in evolution. Yet this is not observable. Not even the top evolutionist has observable evidence and nor do you. So stop pretending your faith in evolution is fact, stop deluding yourself.
