Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team

Yes, give him points back!Kingm wrote:So josko's should get his points back?doing what he did, he probably lost 400-600 point..
Nicest conqueror ever, OMG! He must just get a pass then and no one question anything!!GeneralRisk wrote:He is the only Conqueror I ever encountered that plays any rank. Frivolous report.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
It seems as though your main goal is to have mods overturn the ruling against TheCrown, in which case, this is a frivolous report, and you should probably get a warning for making it. You don't make a report simply to affect the outcome of another (past) case.chapcrap wrote:Yes, give him points back!Kingm wrote:So josko's should get his points back?doing what he did, he probably lost 400-600 point..
I don't know the answer, but I feel like it's silly to punish TheCrown for the same thing and not look at this.Nicest conqueror ever, OMG! He must just get a pass then and no one question anything!!GeneralRisk wrote:He is the only Conqueror I ever encountered that plays any rank. Frivolous report.
It's not frivolous. As stated earlier, I'm not necessarily looking for badness against josko here, but I think things should be fair. Either overturn TheCrown's ruling or do something here. I don't know what you would do as punishment, that's not up to me. I'm just saying these two players' situations aren't equitable at the moment.
Well, it looked like he was colluding Game 13900182, Game 13900095, and Game 13900094. Why else is Moonchild taking turns so slowly? I stole this information from another thread.Swifte wrote:josko can play his games as fast or slow as he wants. His score will rise for a bit, but will fall again when those games do finish up... who cares.
Why's it different from thecrown's case? Because josko's not colluding with other players, asking them to play slower / faster. It's not the same thing at all in my eyes.
That's not my main goal. Sorry if I wasn't clear when I asserted that fairness is the goal.The Voice wrote:It seems as though your main goal is to have mods overturn the ruling against TheCrown, in which case, this is a frivolous report, and you should probably be warned for making it. You don't make a report to affect the outcome of another (past) case. Also, you're comparing apples to oranges, as others have previously said.chapcrap wrote:Yes, give him points back!Kingm wrote:So josko's should get his points back?doing what he did, he probably lost 400-600 point..
I don't know the answer, but I feel like it's silly to punish TheCrown for the same thing and not look at this.Nicest conqueror ever, OMG! He must just get a pass then and no one question anything!!GeneralRisk wrote:He is the only Conqueror I ever encountered that plays any rank. Frivolous report.
It's not frivolous. As stated earlier, I'm not necessarily looking for badness against josko here, but I think things should be fair. Either overturn TheCrown's ruling or do something here. I don't know what you would do as punishment, that's not up to me. I'm just saying these two players' situations aren't equitable at the moment.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
chapcrap wrote:Well, it looked like he was colluding Game 13900182, Game 13900095, and Game 13900094. Why else is Moonchild taking turns so slowly? I stole this information from another thread.Swifte wrote:josko can play his games as fast or slow as he wants. His score will rise for a bit, but will fall again when those games do finish up... who cares.
Why's it different from thecrown's case? Because josko's not colluding with other players, asking them to play slower / faster. It's not the same thing at all in my eyes.
Taking turns slowly is not against the rules. Deliberately not ending the game while you could in a round is against the rules. And just because it "looks" like collusion, I think you would need some evidence to support your accusation.chapcrap wrote:Well, it looked like he was colluding Game 13900182, Game 13900095, and Game 13900094. Why else is Moonchild taking turns so slowly? I stole this information from another thread.Swifte wrote:josko can play his games as fast or slow as he wants. His score will rise for a bit, but will fall again when those games do finish up... who cares.
Why's it different from thecrown's case? Because josko's not colluding with other players, asking them to play slower / faster. It's not the same thing at all in my eyes.
And this was also practice with every other player including Moonchild. I let every player do their turns as slow/fast as they want. If Moonchild or anyone else chose to play his turns slower it is his free choice.Great-Ollie wrote:I played many of those games and at no point did he ask me to play slower.


This.Swifte wrote:josko can play his games as fast or slow as he wants. His score will rise for a bit, but will fall again when those games do finish up... who cares.
Why's it different from thecrown's case? Because josko's not colluding with other players, asking them to play slower / faster. It's not the same thing at all in my eyes.
This too.betiko wrote:this is not about thecrown or josko. this is about a very stupid idea to give prizes to monthly leaders (even if josko doesn't appear to care about it but just wanted a high score). This whole thing smells like rotten fish since day 1.
i get that bigwham's intentions were good, but he didn't think it thourgh; mostly with that absolutely silly "most improved leaderboard". There will not be a single month where 9/10 of those monthly rankings will have done something somewhat tainted.



I tend to agree with you mate. We signed up a new player a couple of weeks ago. He's been around for ages but has just started getting active again fairly recently. Yesterday he's dumped hundreds of points by deadbeating speeders and has been guested. Funny how it's the end of the monthbetiko wrote:this is not about thecrown or josko. this is about a very stupid idea to give prizes to monthly leaders (even if josko doesn't appear to care about it but just wanted a high score). This whole thing smells like rotten fish since day 1.
i get that bigwham's intentions were good, but he didn't think it thourgh; mostly with that absolutely silly "most improved leaderboard". There will not be a single month where 9/10 of those monthly rankings will have done something somewhat tainted.


Playing turns within the allowed 24 hours in any way IS NOT holding hostage. Whoever joins 24 hour game should be aware that opponent's turns may last 24 hours. Purposedly do not win a game which you can win in only one round (opponent has 1 region, and you just deploy and end turn) IS holding hostage so what I did and what he did in any way cannot bethe same because I did not hold hostage.hyposquasher wrote:Isn't it worse to hold off your losses (josko) than your wins (TheCrown)? Those who are about to win a game want the points they are going to get. Seems that the phrase of "taking hostage" (which as been used so much in these cases) applies to this scenario even more than TheCrown one.
Anyway, just my 2 cents.



trevor33 wrote:This is totally different from what The Crown did. Josko was already top of the scoreboard and didn't hold anyone hostage like The Crown did in order to achieve a personal high score.
I have no idea if Josko is guilty or not, but his rank should not influence the answer to the question.Another big difference is that because of TheCrown's method every player lost 1 place on scoreboard and this is HUGE influence to every other CC player. If I was hard fighting to be #1, then it is unfair that because of his method I become #2. With what I did, nobody lost their hardly deserved place on scoreboard.
Unless the collusion with other players can be proved, regarding OP comment on the fairness between the both situation, it seems it is fair that TheCrown was punished and Josko.ri not.After all things said and done in this report, and after gathering all the facts, we have come to this verdict: "Colluding with other players to artificially manipulate the scoring system" is still against the rules. To do this repeatedly is Gross Abuse of the Game. The following has been done to the accused:
Disqualified him from the Monthly Scoreboard Prizes
Disqualified him from the Conquer Medal
Issued a warning for a Major/Severe Infraction (Gross Abuse of the Game)
Reduction of his score back to 2866 (basing this from Game 13596571 where it most likely began).
To any of you who may have plans to do any kind of similar schemes, save yourself from future disciplinary actions and just play the game. We are all here to have fun and enjoy the games. If you want to be recognized, make sure people will see you positively for it and it was honestly done. Don't do things that you might regret afterwards.
I'll keep this report locked. If any of you wish to further discuss about this report, feel free to open a thread in the General Discussions forum.