Moderator: Community Team
I'm sure we'll see a verdict.frankiebee wrote:Getting him off the monthly scoreboard can only mean they think his points we're not legitimate. In that case he should get a point reset to get him from the full scoreboard to.Gilligan wrote:At least he's off the monthly scoreboards, now.

What a curious pair of sentencesDonelladan wrote:He won a lot of game at once, apparently that's forbidden.
He also did hold some people hostage in order to win all the games at a same time.
where Y is doing something illegal and X is the outcome. This construction seems to imply that since X can also happen elsewhere without Y occurring, then it's silly to get annoyed about X when Y has happened. But if Y led to X, you can't ignore it. Surely there is no "also"? To illustrate, here is a real-life application:He X, apparently that's forbidden.
He also Y in order to X.
TheCrown would never have had the high score without cheating, it's as simple as that.He made loads of money, apparently that's forbidden.
He also shot a bunch of people in the face and took their wallets in order to make loads of money."
You sir, are wrong. He ended the december scoreboard with 4500 points or so, Im not sure, after the board resetted he gained massive power score points because his start score was really high and he still had some winstreak game lefts. On the 2nd of december he allready had 15.000+ power score for december. Yes, in 1 day.spiesr wrote:No, he is off the top of the monthly board because he won the majority of his games in November and the boards reset for December.frankiebee wrote:Getting him off the monthly scoreboard can only mean they think his points we're not legitimate. In that case he should get a point reset to get him from the full scoreboard to.Gilligan wrote:At least he's off the monthly scoreboards, now.
This. Holding hostage is against site rules.halashus wrote:I'm sorry, can someone explain to me how he cheated? It seems to me that he simply figured out a way to increase his score by playing a TON of games, winning the majority, delaying the wins until the end. He still had to win a large majority of those games, which he did fair and square. How is that cheating?

king achilles wrote:After all things said and done in this report, and after gathering all the facts, we have come to this verdict: "Colluding with other players to artificially manipulate the scoring system" is still against the rules. To do this repeatedly is Gross Abuse of the Game. The following has been done to the accused:
Disqualified him from the Monthly Scoreboard Prizes
Disqualified him from the Conquer Medal
Issued a warning for a Major/Severe Infraction (Gross Abuse of the Game)
Reduction of his score back to 2866 (basing this from Game 13596571 where it most likely began).
To any of you who may have plans to do any kind of similar schemes, save yourself from future disciplinary actions and just play the game. We are all here to have fun and enjoy the games. If you want to be recognized, make sure people will see you positively for it and it was honestly done. Don't do things that you might regret afterwards.

saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
When I first saw this case I had pretty much the same opinion that you do. However, as I've learned more about it, I've found out that he didn't just "delay" the games in the normal sense of prolonging his turns (as everyone has a right to do) but rather by deliberately not ending games that were definitely over. By accumulating a lot of games that were effectively over and un-naturally prolonging them, he accumulated a stable of finished games that he could then harvest all at once. Sort of like necromancy: accumulating an army of undead games and then launching them at the scoreboard all at once. It did constitute exploiting the scoring system.halashus wrote:I'm sorry, can someone explain to me how he cheated? It seems to me that he simply figured out a way to increase his score by playing a TON of games, winning the majority, delaying the wins until the end. He still had to win a large majority of those games, which he did fair and square. How is that cheating?


ohh yes, i do have that installed once and have not uninstalled,spiesr wrote:According to your image the ad is placed there by Auto Refresh Plus. Did you install something like that?
went into wastebasketspiesr wrote:Some information I found suggests that it possible to turn the ads from Auto Refresh Plus off in the settings for it.
I followed this case without comment, mainly due to being in two minds about it. After the result, I must just say my main feeling is one of sympathy for thecrown. What a lot of work (there is really no other word for it) for nothing!Masli wrote:http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/posting.php?mode=quote&f=239&p=4358946
king achilles wrote:After all things said and done in this report, and after gathering all the facts, we have come to this verdict: "Colluding with other players to artificially manipulate the scoring system" is still against the rules. To do this repeatedly is Gross Abuse of the Game. The following has been done to the accused:
Disqualified him from the Monthly Scoreboard Prizes
Disqualified him from the Conquer Medal
Issued a warning for a Major/Severe Infraction (Gross Abuse of the Game)
Reduction of his score back to 2866 (basing this from Game 13596571 where it most likely began).
To any of you who may have plans to do any kind of similar schemes, save yourself from future disciplinary actions and just play the game. We are all here to have fun and enjoy the games. If you want to be recognized, make sure people will see you positively for it and it was honestly done. Don't do things that you might regret afterwards.

Mr Changsha wrote:I followed this case without comment, mainly due to being in two minds about it. After the result, I must just say my main feeling is one of sympathy for thecrown. What a lot of work (there is really no other word for it) for nothing!Masli wrote:http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/posting.php?mode=quote&f=239&p=4358946
king achilles wrote:After all things said and done in this report, and after gathering all the facts, we have come to this verdict: "Colluding with other players to artificially manipulate the scoring system" is still against the rules. To do this repeatedly is Gross Abuse of the Game. The following has been done to the accused:
Disqualified him from the Monthly Scoreboard Prizes
Disqualified him from the Conquer Medal
Issued a warning for a Major/Severe Infraction (Gross Abuse of the Game)
Reduction of his score back to 2866 (basing this from Game 13596571 where it most likely began).
To any of you who may have plans to do any kind of similar schemes, save yourself from future disciplinary actions and just play the game. We are all here to have fun and enjoy the games. If you want to be recognized, make sure people will see you positively for it and it was honestly done. Don't do things that you might regret afterwards.
The difference is that when you play a series of 5 games, it's kinda cheap and nasty to do it. When you play 700 games with only clanmates, it becomes gross abuse.cooldeals wrote:I found it odd that they didn't reference the hostage games. To be honest I think what Crown did would have been perfectly legal if the games were not held hostage (whether the other person was a willing hostage or not). The only hole I found in his defense was the games where he just dropped when his opponent held only 1 region. I can't name how many times I'm playing an opponent in series of 5 and they will hold off playing their wins in the series and play their losses first to get the best out of me in points.
check my profile,Tenebrus wrote:Yeah, if the games hadn't been with clan mates, it'd still probably be illegal because of the hostage taking. Interesting question though - if you *really* tried hard, I wonder if you could get almost as good a result by playing your turns super quick in a 24 hr casual game when you're losing, and taking 23hr 59m when you're winning. Would need you to be up 24/7 but... maybe not illegal.
Probably won't be long before someone tries it...

A C&A mod should answer this, but I think this still would be abuse of the scoreboard. Maybe we have to change something about how points are calculated... But Im not really sure what.Tenebrus wrote:Yeah, if the games hadn't been with clan mates, it'd still probably be illegal because of the hostage taking. Interesting question though - if you *really* tried hard, I wonder if you could get almost as good a result by playing your turns super quick in a 24 hr casual game when you're losing, and taking 23hr 59m when you're winning. Would need you to be up 24/7 but... maybe not illegal.
Probably won't be long before someone tries it...