Jippd wrote:32 players will come from the entry brackets so that leaves 96 players to be selected from open entry based on score. Just want to make sure I'm checking things right. Thanks for the reply
Yes. The one way that won't happen is if multiple people qualify by getting top 4 in multiple satellites and the fifth placers are the same way, then we'd have a few less from satellites and few more through open entry.
elronin wrote:Someones shootin' at someone. Lets us go find this here war. IN PLEASE (unless premium is needed) I'm always up for something new.
Premium is not needed for the first round. A special exemption has been made for this tournament that will let you play all 7 games. However, premium is required to move into the second round.
I'd like to play. Though my score isn't so hot, at least I have till the 30th. So there is no consideration given to peoples 1 v 1 scores or win ratio? Because if this is to find the best 1 v 1 champ shouldn't that be taken into account. Someone may have 3200 and a much higher score than me and they get all that from speed games or winning 8 player games, but that has nothing to do with 1 v 1. Just a question?
Dice stats are irrelevant. If I roll the same amount of 6's as everyone else, but my opponents role 6's at the same time, that's what matters, what's rolled opposite my dice. How about how many total guys I've won and lost while attacking?
alaskanassassin wrote:I'd like to play. Though my score isn't so hot, at least I have till the 30th. So there is no consideration given to peoples 1 v 1 scores or win ratio? Because if this is to find the best 1 v 1 champ shouldn't that be taken into account. Someone may have 3200 and a much higher score than me and they get all that from speed games or winning 8 player games, but that has nothing to do with 1 v 1. Just a question?
This is a good point. You could easily map rank players on the 30th to figure out their 1 v 1 win ratio.
alaskanassassin wrote:I'd like to play. Though my score isn't so hot, at least I have till the 30th. So there is no consideration given to peoples 1 v 1 scores or win ratio? Because if this is to find the best 1 v 1 champ shouldn't that be taken into account. Someone may have 3200 and a much higher score than me and they get all that from speed games or winning 8 player games, but that has nothing to do with 1 v 1. Just a question?
This is a good point. You could easily map rank players on the 30th to figure out their 1 v 1 win ratio.
Well, it's just a tiebreaker. The problem with ratio is they could be lying as well. What if they play a bunch of games against bad players? What if I map rank and it includes bot games as well, which can definitely increase the winning precentage pretty easily?
Essentially, I am open to all tiebreakers and if something is more fair than something else, I don't necessarily have a problem using something different than points, but I'm not really sure that we have anything more fair than simply overall points.
alaskanassassin wrote:I'd like to play. Though my score isn't so hot, at least I have till the 30th. So there is no consideration given to peoples 1 v 1 scores or win ratio? Because if this is to find the best 1 v 1 champ shouldn't that be taken into account. Someone may have 3200 and a much higher score than me and they get all that from speed games or winning 8 player games, but that has nothing to do with 1 v 1. Just a question?
This is a good point. You could easily map rank players on the 30th to figure out their 1 v 1 win ratio.
Well, it's just a tiebreaker. The problem with ratio is they could be lying as well. What if they play a bunch of games against bad players? What if I map rank and it includes bot games as well, which can definitely increase the winning precentage pretty easily?
Essentially, I am open to all tiebreakers and if something is more fair than something else, I don't necessarily have a problem using something different than points, but I'm not really sure that we have anything more fair than simply overall points.
I understand and agree with what you said. I didn't think about those things. I guess there is no easy way to make a perfect entry system. I'm just afraid I won't qualify because my rating is semi low at the moment, even though I probably have a pretty good 1 v 1 win ratio. It's my one strong point on CC, I suck at everything else! :p I'll just have to win one of the qualifiers and leave no doubt. Thanks for running this chapcrap, its an exciting new addition to CC.
Dice stats are irrelevant. If I roll the same amount of 6's as everyone else, but my opponents role 6's at the same time, that's what matters, what's rolled opposite my dice. How about how many total guys I've won and lost while attacking?
in please. i joined some satellite tourneys too. If that means i can't sign up here, then forget this. I see the "OR" but not sure if that means either way is possible or only one way is possible.
taking a break from cc, will be back sometime in the future.
