I was just wondering who are the worst rated players. Players with 1000+ games under their belt that achieved something incredible: being under 4.0!! (anyone with a rating between 4.5 and 4.0 is already a horrible player!) anyways, here are some names for us to worship! (or a starting kit for a good foe list). Anyone thinks these players don't deserve the average rating they achieved throughout their CC career?
mr. dildo has a score close to 2400. he must be a dick (or compensating because he does not have one...trying to understand the name?) in game chat as that rating does not reflect his score.
Amazing data, well the only name I recognize is demonfork who can definitely play above the Welterweight division with a 66% win rate, that's pretty good . The rest I presume are not worth bothering about
We are the Fallen, an unstoppable wave of Darkness.
ChrisPond wrote:mr. dildo has a score close to 2400. he must be a dick (or compensating because he does not have one...trying to understand the name?) in game chat as that rating does not reflect his score.
Artimis wrote:3.0 is the lowest? I expected [player]codeblue1018[/player] to be on a 2.8 rating or lower, he's one to avoid for sure.
Yes, avoid like chili drenched super glue on your genitals. Great that every win is due to luck on his opponents part. REMEMBER HE HAS BEEN BRIG 3 TIMES! The type of egotism that leads him to give himself facials in the front of the.mirror.
Artimis wrote:3.0 is the lowest? I expected [player]codeblue1018[/player] to be on a 2.8 rating or lower, he's one to avoid for sure.
This is just about players with a 1000+ games played, there are some bellow 3.0 but I didn't consider players who were probably not rated enough times. codeblue has been on the road to redemption for at least a year; just check his ratings, he became a "normal" player since he joined TSM.
ChrisPond wrote:mr. dildo has a score close to 2400. he must be a dick (or compensating because he does not have one...trying to understand the name?) in game chat as that rating does not reflect his score.
The rating has nothing to do with the score. People rate the attitude! Deadbeat, suicider, irrational, clueless, rude... lots of reasons to rate poorly!
Artimis wrote:3.0 is the lowest? I expected [player]codeblue1018[/player] to be on a 2.8 rating or lower, he's one to avoid for sure.
This is just about players with a 1000+ games played, there are some bellow 3.0 but I didn't consider players who were probably not rated enough times. codeblue has been on the road to redemption for at least a year; just check his ratings, he became a "normal" player since he joined TSM.
Dildo baggins has a message for you:
Your Youtube link is broken, is this what you were trying to show me?
Artimis wrote:3.0 is the lowest? I expected [player]codeblue1018[/player] to be on a 2.8 rating or lower, he's one to avoid for sure.
This is just about players with a 1000+ games played, there are some bellow 3.0 but I didn't consider players who were probably not rated enough times. codeblue has been on the road to redemption for at least a year; just check his ratings, he became a "normal" player since he joined TSM.
I call bullshit on this, will take him off foe, and try a game against him. If he/she has really changed what are the odds that someone else has co opted the account!
Artimis wrote:3.0 is the lowest? I expected [player]codeblue1018[/player] to be on a 2.8 rating or lower, he's one to avoid for sure.
This is just about players with a 1000+ games played, there are some bellow 3.0 but I didn't consider players who were probably not rated enough times. codeblue has been on the road to redemption for at least a year; just check his ratings, he became a "normal" player since he joined TSM.
I call bullshit on this, will take him off foe, and try a game against him. If he/she has really changed what are the odds that someone else has co opted the account!
Ironic! I've had you foed for well over a year Bogan, yet I enjoy playing both with and against Code. Course maybe I missed his bad boy days, I've only been teaming with him for a year or so. You on the other hand... well I do display an occasional post of yours - doesn't really matter which ones as they all serve as a reminder of an attitude that stinks.
But to be fair I'm sure there's players who feel the same about me.
Are you trying to start a bashing thread? Although this may not be your intent, you can't honestly tell me that this didn't cross your mind of what it may turn into. I reserve any further comment on this "helpful" topic that you felt compelled to start.
Artimis wrote:3.0 is the lowest? I expected [player]codeblue1018[/player] to be on a 2.8 rating or lower, he's one to avoid for sure.
Yes, avoid like chili drenched super glue on your genitals. Great that every win is due to luck on his opponents part. REMEMBER HE HAS BEEN BRIG 3 TIMES! The type of egotism that leads him to give himself facials in the front of the.mirror.
Artimis wrote:3.0 is the lowest? I expected [player]codeblue1018[/player] to be on a 2.8 rating or lower, he's one to avoid for sure.
This is just about players with a 1000+ games played, there are some bellow 3.0 but I didn't consider players who were probably not rated enough times. codeblue has been on the road to redemption for at least a year; just check his ratings, he became a "normal" player since he joined TSM.
I call bullshit on this, will take him off foe, and try a game against him. If he/she has really changed what are the odds that someone else has co opted the account!
he did go from 2.8 to 3.3, and I know that one day he wrote a PM to say sorry and that he had changed; a bit like george W bush. I thought it was greatly inspiring and i removed him from my foe list.
I foed Codeblue and long time ago, and then went and took some people out of my foe list. If I didn't remember what they did, I unfoed them. He was the only one that was still in my foe list after..
Why remove all your foes? If they are there in the first place it s for a reason. If the guy specifically sends a pm, i reconsider it. There are just some people you don t want to be bothered with.
betiko wrote:Why remove all your foes? If they are there in the first place it s for a reason. If the guy specifically sends a pm, i reconsider it. There are just some people you don t want to be bothered with.
Almost all of mine came from 6-player speeders on Doodle because they suicided me. I decided to give them a second chance.
Wrong thread, but as you're discussing it here then why the hell not?
My former foes were on my list for a variety of reasons:
Playing very badly to a degree that would equate to the level of a cook or worse(and yes, there is worse! ).
Cheating(obviously!)
Being a massive shithead all game with grossly disproportionate trash talk that was not called for.
Spurious accusations in the C&A forum([player]Colton24[/player] was the prime offender, not sure why I didn't add [player]sailorseal[/player] as well, but it's all moot now anyway.)
All entries except for two recently added foes were on my foes list for 4 or more years. So I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt, they might remind me why I foed them in the first place, then again they might not.
================================================== This post was sponsored by Far-Q Industries.
Far-Q Industries: Telling you where to go since 2008.
betiko wrote:Why remove all your foes? If they are there in the first place it s for a reason. If the guy specifically sends a pm, i reconsider it. There are just some people you don t want to be bothered with.
It's been so long that I don't care any more, but alas I don't care enough to remove them. Woe is me!
Codeblue has been a really cool guy since he joined us and i think the rating he has right now is much lower that he should have had. Maybe he had some bad moments in the past, but hey, I have been foed because I wrote "wow" on a chat after an extremely lucky turn of an enemy! hehe
).
