Moderator: Cartographers
Correct - Alaska and Kamchatka do not border each other.Industrial Helix wrote:Yep, revive it.
Though, is there no connection between Alaska and Kamchatka? If not, that's great, I love it. Antarctica is the only trans-continental route to go which makes it unique enough to be a fun map.
Me too!Teflon Kris wrote:Hoping this moves forward again quickly
Yeah - I need to decide if there's enough room to move the line to the other side of Newfoundland, or whether I need to scrub out the island. Hopefully there's space for the former...t-o-m wrote:Me too!Teflon Kris wrote:Hoping this moves forward again quickly
I've also just re-read my post above, it isn't clear. I mean that I feel the Iberia-Canada connection could look like it is an Iberia-U.S. and could have a bit more definition, for clarity's sake.
My vote would be to do this.isaiah40 wrote:Did you decide if you are going to make the small 400px wide? Either way is fine with me.
+1isaiah40 wrote:The 400px small is a whole lot easier on these old eyes!
+1Gilligan wrote:+1isaiah40 wrote:The 400px small is a whole lot easier on these old eyes!
Although it's much easier to read the frostbite thing on the 300px map
Well I'm sure mr.Benn will get that fixed!Gilligan wrote:+1isaiah40 wrote:The 400px small is a whole lot easier on these old eyes!
Although it's much easier to read the frostbite thing on the 300px map
Stephan Wayne wrote:Every day is Fool's Day on CC.
That's really easy to do - I have no idea why it's different in both versions - all I did was resized the map and turned different layers on/off... Oh yes, the pixel font has to be 8pts to look right, so I probably caught the frostbite text layer in the same group when I fixed it.. Anyways, I'll make sure I do it right next timekoontz1973 wrote:MrBenn, right now I have one problem with game play and it is a very easy thing to fix.
On the small map you have NG, whilst on the large one you have written New Guinea. Both of these need to be the same so either New Guinea on the small or NG on the large. You have room on the large map to put a notation for the abbreviation. Another way to solve this and maybe far better is to call that region Papua. Same with Maghreb and West Africa.
The labels don't need to be the same on both versions of the map - that can be clarified with XML territory labels such as "New Guinea (NG)", "Middle East (ME)" etc. Wherever possible I want to use full names; obviously the size restriction of the small map at 300px made that difficult; hopefully there will be a little more flexibility enlarging it to 400px - which it seems like most people would prefer. From now, the small map will be the 400px version
Thanks! They're not supposed to be named different - I must have changed it at some point and only changed one of them! Which would people prefer?JamesKer1 wrote:Cool map!
Any reason for the Mahgreb-W. Africa name change in the large to small versions? Might be confusing for attacking purposes...
koontz1973 wrote:Either way, keep the 400 pixel version over the 300 and fix the lettering for the frostbite. Once done, I will get you stamped.
It'll make it slightly harder to get from the start (almost like a tiny dustbowl). Long-term you're right, and the decay will only really affect the stackability of Enderby.Gilligan wrote:Is there any point to -1 on Getz and Wilkes if they don't border anything? If you have the bonus, there is going to be 1s on it anyway.
Also assuming that they start neutral?MrBenn wrote:It'll make it slightly harder to get from the start (almost like a tiny dustbowl). Long-term you're right, and the decay will only really affect the stackability of Enderby.Gilligan wrote:Is there any point to -1 on Getz and Wilkes if they don't border anything? If you have the bonus, there is going to be 1s on it anyway.
Not necessarily... discuss!Gilligan wrote:Also assuming that they start neutral?MrBenn wrote:It'll make it slightly harder to get from the start (almost like a tiny dustbowl). Long-term you're right, and the decay will only really affect the stackability of Enderby.Gilligan wrote:Is there any point to -1 on Getz and Wilkes if they don't border anything? If you have the bonus, there is going to be 1s on it anyway.
