Moderator: Clan Directors

Did you have a bye?The_Samurai wrote:I can't find Round 15 !?!

Click round 14. The 15th is hide there. You are 4-7 but with a wwii on going.The_Samurai wrote:I can't find Round 15 !?!
fixed!LEQUEEN wrote:Click round 14. The 15th is hide there. You are 4-7 but with a wwii on going.The_Samurai wrote:I can't find Round 15 !?!
Does it helps?
think they pretty much have it, even with tffs loss, foed looks good to themLeehar wrote:What do LoW need from tffs/foed & hh to guarantee this, and how close are they to doing so?!
but too soon to call anything, there have been many upsets in last rounds so..HOW TO WIN?
-have the most points
-if same points then head to head score

This is just coincidence. It could also happen the totally opposite scenario, if LOW have 3 points more, but TOFU won your match and TOFU has lower overall games/lost. In that case with this scenario you would still have chance and in scenario which you propose you would not have chance, so the argument that you lost hope before last round and that is why this system is bad does not stay.Chariot of Fire wrote:We ended up in the unfortunate position of knowing we couldn't beat LOW even if we drew on points, as they won the head-to-head, which made the remainder of our games somewhat stale and insignificant.

actualy head to head go last--first points>second goal difference, and then head to head.josko.ri wrote:This is just coincidence. It could also happen the totally opposite scenario, if LOW have 3 points more, but TOFU won your match and TOFU has lower overall games/lost. In that case with this scenario you would still have chance and in scenario which you propose you would not have chance, so the argument that you lost hope before last round and that is why this system is bad does not stay.Chariot of Fire wrote:We ended up in the unfortunate position of knowing we couldn't beat LOW even if we drew on points, as they won the head-to-head, which made the remainder of our games somewhat stale and insignificant.
I support head to head matches over overall score, that is how the most soccer leagues works anyways.
Qwert, that depends on the league. In some, head to head prevails in others its goal differenceQwert wrote:actualy head to head go last--first points>second goal difference, and then head to head.josko.ri wrote:This is just coincidence. It could also happen the totally opposite scenario, if LOW have 3 points more, but TOFU won your match and TOFU has lower overall games/lost. In that case with this scenario you would still have chance and in scenario which you propose you would not have chance, so the argument that you lost hope before last round and that is why this system is bad does not stay.Chariot of Fire wrote:We ended up in the unfortunate position of knowing we couldn't beat LOW even if we drew on points, as they won the head-to-head, which made the remainder of our games somewhat stale and insignificant.
I support head to head matches over overall score, that is how the most soccer leagues works anyways.


It really doesn't matter how we deal with tie, those rules are know at the start.Crazyirishman wrote:One thing I wouldn't mind for the next one would be if say TOFU and us were tied in points after all these months, is to have a 2nd match (maybe between 15 and 19 games?) between the the top 2 teams in the event of a tie.
But overall, benga has done a great job running this, and I'm sure it will gather even more clans next year.


This!benga wrote: It really doesn't matter how we deal with tie, those rules are know at the start.
What you have said doesn't make any sense (or at least I cannot work out what you mean in your first paragraph). As for your second statement - well that's simply not true. The majority of football leagues work on Points followed by Goal Difference (thanks Keefie for posting that info).josko.ri wrote:This is just coincidence. It could also happen the totally opposite scenario, if LOW have 3 points more, but TOFU won your match and TOFU has lower overall games/lost. In that case with this scenario you would still have chance and in scenario which you propose you would not have chance, so the argument that you lost hope before last round and that is why this system is bad does not stay.Chariot of Fire wrote:We ended up in the unfortunate position of knowing we couldn't beat LOW even if we drew on points, as they won the head-to-head, which made the remainder of our games somewhat stale and insignificant.
I support head to head matches over overall score, that is how the most soccer leagues works anyways.

I must say that benga are right here> rules are build before start of league, and everybody agree when they join.chariot of fire
What you have said doesn't make any sense (or at least I cannot work out what you mean in your first paragraph). As for your second statement - well that's simply not true. The majority of football leagues work on Points followed by Goal Difference (thanks Keefie for posting that info).
It may be a moot point anyway if benga's not really interested in the rules regarding a points tie, but it is worth noting the following:
Team A finish with 45 points and a record of 185 wins and 7 losses
Team B finish with 45 points and a record of 105 wins and 87 losses
Under the current rules Team B could be the winner. I just don't think that's fair, not when it is a league and a whole season's results should be taken into consideration.
btw benga, I know I said it before, but your off-site table of Matches/Results/Standings was excellent and I'm sure would be a welcome continuation in the next edition of this tourney.


no, you misunderstand what i say, i support benga idea, that next Random League have 14 clans, and that first 10 from RL3 get promoted directly, and that last 4 spots, be filled with new clans who dont play in RL3.Keefie wrote:If rules are for the start of the league then it's a bit disappointing to hear you support the idea of only the top 10 being invited to the next RLSurely that should have been announced at the start of the competition.