[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1091: Undefined array key 0 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1091: Trying to access array offset on null [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Undefined array key 0 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Trying to access array offset on null [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Undefined array key 0 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Trying to access array offset on null Classic games, australian bonus - Conquer Club
Well it's been like that since the original board game, so it's unlikely to change...
I think it's fair overall that both are equal bonuses since both have 4 countries
and South America is in a better position strategically. From South America you can expand into Africa or North America which are easier to hold than Asia, which is the logical expansion point from Australia.
Personally I think Australia is a nicer continent to hold since it is much easier to defend, however overall I think the 2 army bonus is fair for both.
Genghis Khan CA wrote:Well it's been like that since the original board game, so it's unlikely to change...
I think it's fair overall that both are equal bonuses since both have 4 countries and South America is in a better position strategically. From South America you can expand into Africa or North America which are easier to hold than Asia, which is the logical expansion point from Australia.
Personally I think Australia is a nicer continent to hold since it is much easier to defend, however overall I think the 2 army bonus is fair for both.
I hope you read my post on this topic a few days ago so its fresh in your mind. Otherwise we are thinking quite alike again!
sure, australia is easy to defend, but getting out of their is mighty hard, since which ever way you go you have fast increasing numbers of boundry territories. Asia is tough to hold and that is the only direction to expand. So i think bonus of two is fair.
Well, I'd actually rather have SA than Aussie despite the two borders, so I guess I don't think the bonus is too high. Hell, what about NA vs Europe. Europe is next to impossible to defend and is worth the same as NA. Beyond that, you can expand from NA into SA, not take on any more borders and get another 3 armies per turn (1 due to the fact that you'll be occupying another 3 territories).
But I guess it will be more interesting if the bonus is only 1 army, a lot of players tent to stay all the game there and let the play to others because they have a really good bonus considering the number of countries.
I agree it should be changed....Also, I think boardwalk's rent is far too high...
and Aces should not be the highest cards in the deck
and the stratego men should get renumbered so that 10 is a marshal instead of a one......actually they did that, almost lost some real money on that one
I'm Spanking Monkey now....err...I mean I'm a Spanking Monkey now...that shoots milk Too much. I know.
AAFitz wrote:I agree it should be changed....Also, I think boardwalk's rent is far too high...
and Aces should not be the highest cards in the deck
and the stratego men should get renumbered so that 10 is a marshal instead of a one......actually they did that, almost lost some real money on that one
Yeah, that was really confusing.
This is somewhat related: If you know how to do a 2 move checkmate you can make a lot of money off of people who don't believe such a thing exists.
From SA you can advance into either NA or Africa with ease. From Australia you really can't do anything but advance into Asia, which is enormous and really difficult to hold. I find Aus better in no card games, but if it's flat rate or escalating then SA is still much better.
If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?
AAFitz wrote:I agree it should be changed....Also, I think boardwalk's rent is far too high...
and Aces should not be the highest cards in the deck
and the stratego men should get renumbered so that 10 is a marshal instead of a one......actually they did that, almost lost some real money on that one
Yeah, that was really confusing.
This is somewhat related: If you know how to do a 2 move checkmate you can make a lot of money off of people who don't believe such a thing exists.
How sully, tell us!
I know the one move checkmate, its picking up the opponents king, and tossing it across the room, and declaring "haha, you forfeit"
GunnaRoolsUDrool wrote:yo mama has 3 titties, ones for milk, ones for water, ones out of order
AAFitz wrote:I agree it should be changed....Also, I think boardwalk's rent is far too high...
and Aces should not be the highest cards in the deck
and the stratego men should get renumbered so that 10 is a marshal instead of a one......actually they did that, almost lost some real money on that one
Yeah, that was really confusing.
This is somewhat related: If you know how to do a 2 move checkmate you can make a lot of money off of people who don't believe such a thing exists.
How sully, tell us!
I know the one move checkmate, its picking up the opponents king, and tossing it across the room, and declaring "haha, you forfeit"
Sorry man, that's one trick I won't just explain. Because I guarantee someone won't believe me when I say I could do a 2 move checkmate.
sully800 wrote:Sorry man, that's one trick I won't just explain. Because I guarantee someone won't believe me when I say I could do a 2 move checkmate.
Seen it, but your opponent kinda has to let it happen and help a bit.
Last edited by Coleman on Mon May 14, 2007 12:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
wicked wrote:Then how would snifner ever win a game?
LMAO @ wicked - I threw myself hopelessly at Australia tonight and Scott-Land kicked me off that side of the board. But somehow I still won that game somehow 432041
Games completed: 250
Rank: 104
Times I lost with Australia:
AAFitz wrote:I agree it should be changed....Also, I think boardwalk's rent is far too high...
and Aces should not be the highest cards in the deck
and the stratego men should get renumbered so that 10 is a marshal instead of a one......actually they did that, almost lost some real money on that one
Yeah, that was really confusing.
This is somewhat related: If you know how to do a 2 move checkmate you can make a lot of money off of people who don't believe such a thing exists.
How sully, tell us!
I know the one move checkmate, its picking up the opponents king, and tossing it across the room, and declaring "haha, you forfeit"
It's pretty much impossible to do.
You have to be playing black for a start and white has to make the following first 2 moves (doesn't matter which order)
> 1. f2-f3
> 2. g2-g4
as black your first move has to be to move your King's pawn one or two (doesn't matter which), so
> 1. ... e7-e6 or 1. ... e7-e5
and then your 2nd move to check mate is:
> 2. ... Qd8-h4++
wrestler1ump wrote:2007-06-29 06:39:38 - wrestler1ump: why does Rockiesman have a red dart target next to his name?
[quote="sully800]This is somewhat related: If you know how to do a 2 move checkmate you can make a lot of money off of people who don't believe such a thing exists.[/quote]
you don't have to give me money john1099 - but a gifted premium would be nice
wrestler1ump wrote:2007-06-29 06:39:38 - wrestler1ump: why does Rockiesman have a red dart target next to his name?
AAFitz wrote:I agree it should be changed....Also, I think boardwalk's rent is far too high...
and Aces should not be the highest cards in the deck
and the stratego men should get renumbered so that 10 is a marshal instead of a one......actually they did that, almost lost some real money on that one
Yeah, that was really confusing.
This is somewhat related: If you know how to do a 2 move checkmate you can make a lot of money off of people who don't believe such a thing exists.
Well I guess that was a nice form to say it can't be done,