Moderator: Community Team

So in CYOC, I end the jokevote stage too early, and now I carry on too long. Sheesh. Things are going badly. TBH, I kept jokevoting because I expected the Comm9/IB saga to blow over, but it hasn't so unvote. Now to have a re-read of the IB/Comm9 storm in a teacup and see who I side with.Nebuchadnezer wrote:Okay, three things I'm seeing...
1. Jonty seems forever stuck in joke vote stage.![]()
2. KGB piling on a joke vote, which was not that funny.![]()
3. The Commander/Iron Butterfly thing escalated rather quickly.![]()
FOS is for those who don't want to have a voting pattern...therefore...VOTE Commander
It's D1. Gotta start somewhere.
That's exactly why Commander9 is voting for IB. Sounds like OMGUS horsemanure to me.jonty125 wrote:vote Commander9 for his over-reaction regarding IB.
did you want an instascum win because you are scum?jonty125 wrote:unvote, vote strike wolf INSTASCUMWIN!!DoomYoshi wrote:vote strike wolf
SPEEDLYNCH GO! GO! GO!
and now you are just sheeping spiesr and jumping on commander's bandwagon.jonty125 wrote:vote Commander9 for his over-reaction regarding IB.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
I find his FOS and now serious vote on IB, over-reacting. Maybe it was just me, but I read IB's comment asCommander9 wrote:If you want, we can go out of the joke vote stage. Our wagon was on mod, which was obviously means nothing will happen. It was never going to be realized and even if we reached full numbers, do you really think the mod would have been lynched?Iron Butterfly wrote:So what exactly do you find legit? The fact that you are obviously piling on a joke vote or that my joke vote on Doom was your bandwagan.Commander9 wrote:Seems legit. Besides, you hopped on my wagon...aage wrote:Asskisser.Iron Butterfly wrote:FOS all of you on the Strikewolf bandwagon. He gets lynched and its game over.
unvote vote IB
Unvote. Vote Butterfly.
My legitimacy was obviously a joke, but it seems you've been looking hard to find anything you could pile your vote on and just chose the closest possible reason without it actually it being any reason for now. So for looking for an easy suspect and being quite defencive against a 2 people wagon at the very beginning of the game, you get my FoS. My vote stays for now.
,Commander9 wrote:I don't, but your implication left me wondering. If your post was a joke, my apologies - but it seemed anything but that.Iron Butterfly wrote:Is there a reason you put that first paragraph in or do you really believe that some players believe the game would end with the mod lynched? Or perhaps the obvious sarcasm was lost on you with my mass FOS?![]()
Why would I consider you an "easy suspect"? Those are the words you use to explain your FOS on me. Are you implying you may have said something that could have been interpreted in a negative way on your part?
I'd consider myself an easier suspect than most due to several things:
I) I've been out for a while, thus I may be rusty.
II) I've already noticed that I've forgotten about some specific mechanics, thus possible pressure could get more of that.
III) WIFOM (The reason I fos'd you): since I've started that BW, you may have hoped for an easy lynch.

Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
so the (new and separate) joke vote begins on IB with aage, technically vote 3 since dazza and skill had joke votes on IB bc "i just felt like it" and "not seeing clearly" respectively (they have since unvoted IB and continued joke voting against dazza)aage wrote:Asskisser.Iron Butterfly wrote:FOS all of you on the Strikewolf bandwagon. He gets lynched and its game over.
unvote vote IB
comm obvious IMO joke vote on IB, vote 4Commander9 wrote:Seems legit. Besides, you hopped on my wagon...aage wrote:Asskisser.Iron Butterfly wrote:FOS all of you on the Strikewolf bandwagon. He gets lynched and its game over.
unvote vote IB
Unvote. Vote Butterfly.
IB's response - possibly sniffing out that it was still a joke vote, perhaps a little defensive..Iron Butterfly wrote: So what exactly do you find legit? The fact that you are obviously piling on a joke vote or that my joke vote on Doom was your bandwagan.
comm confirming (what most of us all thought was a joke vote) stating it was a joke vote, maybe comm didn't realize but the vote against IB was technically up to 4 and thenCommander9 wrote: If you want, we can go out of the joke vote stage. Our wagon was on mod, which was obviously means nothing will happen. It was never going to be realized and even if we reached full numbers, do you really think the mod would have been lynched?
My legitimacy was obviously a joke, but it seems you've been looking hard to find anything you could pile your vote on and just chose the closest possible reason without it actually it being any reason for now. So for looking for an easy suspect and being quite defencive against a 2 people wagon at the very beginning of the game, you get my FoS. My vote stays for now
spiesr wrote:Given that it is the only thing we have to go on thus far I will Unvote Vote Commander for overreacting.
Nebuchadnezer wrote:Okay, three things I'm seeing...
1. Jonty seems forever stuck in joke vote stage.![]()
2. KGB piling on a joke vote, which was not that funny.![]()
3. The Commander/Iron Butterfly thing escalated rather quickly.![]()
FOS is for those who don't want to have a voting pattern...therefore...VOTE Commander
It's D1. Gotta start somewhere.
momentum building against comm, can't say i disagree at this pointjonty125 wrote:vote Commander9 for his over-reaction regarding IB.
Not why comm is voting for IB IMO as (I think) have spelled out so far..aage wrote:That's exactly why Commander9 is voting for IB. Sounds like OMGUS horsemanure to me.
kudos to pancake for succintly summing up the action as i seem not to be doing..pancakemix wrote:Comm joking, IB steaming and jonty sheeping are all pretty much par for the course respectively. Sheeping is definitely the worst of those plays, I'd say. But I'll give him the benefit of the doubt here: Jonty, how exactly did Comm overreact?
then we get this from comm in response to IB's questionIron Butterfly wrote:Why would I consider you an "easy suspect"? Those are the words you use to explain your FOS on me. Are you implying you may have said something that could have been interpreted in a negative way on your part?
technically true, comm didn't specifcally say he thought IB was considering himself (comm) to be an easy target so i'll go back to my comment in green and i ask you comm, who was IB looking for as an easy target?? vote comm until he gives me a satisfactory answerCommander9 wrote:I don't, but your implication left me wondering. If your post was a joke, my apologies - but it seemed anything but that.
Are you sure? Because it seems to me like IB was the one who overreacted and Comm responded in kind. IB looks to have totally misread Comm's use of the phrase "seems legit" ,which is a meme implying sarcastically that something "seems legit", even though it obviously isn't (like how lynching the mod would end the game). Knowing that meme exists and knowing Comm to be a fan of them (he and I worked on a meme-themed game together in the past) I didn't misread that, but if IB wasn't aware of it that could easily be a cause for misunderstanding.jonty125 wrote:I find his FOS and now serious vote on IB, over-reacting. Maybe it was just me, but I read IB's comment as
[img]
so I felt comm9 placing a serious vote, was an over-reaction.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
Would you mind explaining the pattern thingie?Nebuchadnezer wrote:Okay, three things I'm seeing...
1. Jonty seems forever stuck in joke vote stage.![]()
2. KGB piling on a joke vote, which was not that funny.![]()
3. The Commander/Iron Butterfly thing escalated rather quickly.![]()
FOS is for those who don't want to have a voting pattern...therefore...VOTE Commander
It's D1. Gotta start somewhere.
Mind explaining without just hopping on the wagon?jonty125 wrote:vote Commander9 for his over-reaction regarding IB.
It is the best vote that I had at the moment and I did end up sticking with it. I tend to not throw my votes all over the place and I won't be changing that. The only person currently more suspicious to me is you for your jumping the wagon especially without even having a good reason.
... Look back and read again. My vote was quite clearly a joke while you took it seriously and actually started going away from the joke vote, thus starting some serious voting. Our FoS's are different because while my vote was clearly joke, you started attacking me.Iron Butterfly wrote:The thing is you did not start a bandwagon. You made a joke vote on Doom and I made a separate joke vote. Hardly a bandwagon. Now I do find it odd that you were the fourth person to vote me, in essence helping to roll a joke bandwagon on me. That is the same reasoning you used for your initial FOS and then vote.
The main difference is that your vote preceded all the drama and then you use the excuse I voted Doom in the hopes a wagon would start, while you already started rolling one on me. Very hypocritical to boot.
My push back on you was for this exact reason.
Just my feelings on those people who are afraid to put their votes out there and would rather play it safe by never voting. It annoys me. So, I always vote what I'm thinking, and don't use FOS...FOS is for those afraid to commit to what they post. By putting a vote out there, it also provides additional information for later in the game that will help town. Sure you can put any WIFOM spin on my thinking you want, but there's your peek into how my mind works.Commander9 wrote:Would you mind explaining the pattern thingie?Nebuchadnezer wrote:Okay, three things I'm seeing...
1. Jonty seems forever stuck in joke vote stage.![]()
2. KGB piling on a joke vote, which was not that funny.![]()
3. The Commander/Iron Butterfly thing escalated rather quickly.![]()
FOS is for those who don't want to have a voting pattern...therefore...VOTE Commander
It's D1. Gotta start somewhere.
I'm getting a feeling you've never seen me play before, thus why you are mistaking my plays. I am *not* afraid to commit and put my votes on people and I can be extremely thorough when making my cases, but I will not throw my votes around all the time unless there's a very good reason to do so. I think that FoS is actually extremely useful as it allows people to point out suspicious behavior and tendencies, but do not feel it warrants anything stronger... Yet. Basically, it's normally stored for later use in case that person does something odd, which you can then come back, compare and say: "AHA. At that time he was acting and doing this, but now he's singing a different tune."Nebuchadnezer wrote:Just my feelings on those people who are afraid to put their votes out there and would rather play it safe by never voting. It annoys me. So, I always vote what I'm thinking, and don't use FOS...FOS is for those afraid to commit to what they post. By putting a vote out there, it also provides additional information for later in the game that will help town. Sure you can put any WIFOM spin on my thinking you want, but there's your peek into how my mind works.
You stated in response to IB getting defensively over the "seems legit" bandwagon vote that IB was looking for an "easy target" but IB had not voted other than his joke vote, I don't have access to a computer for the weekend so maybe someone else can help me out but in my previous post, the first green text is your response and the second green text is me disagreeing with your responseCommander9 wrote: @ KB
Can you explain your question again? I've read post twice and I still am unsure what you asked.
That response didn't answer anything. Your statements are addressing situation before anything happened. The whole thing escalated after my vote on IB, to which he overreacted, which is our whole deal. Your points are absolutely invalid as up until that statement it was obvious a joke-vote stage and up until the IB's accusations, no one was concerned about anything... Which basically renders your whole argument and case invalid.kgb007 wrote:You stated in response to IB getting defensively over the "seems legit" bandwagon vote that IB was looking for an "easy target" but IB had not voted other than his joke vote, I don't have access to a computer for the weekend so maybe someone else can help me out but in my previous post, the first green text is your response and the second green text is me disagreeing with your response
So the question then is: who is this easy suspect? Because up to the point when you made this post, IB had only voted one person.it seems you've been looking hard to find anything you could pile your vote on and just chose the closest possible reason without it actually it being any reason for now. So for looking for an easy suspect and being quite defencive against a 2 people wagon at the very beginning of the game, you get my Fos
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
I did not over react. I made no accusations. I asked you a simple question, though I forgot to use a question mark. *grin* I would think it was formed as an obvious question.Commander9 wrote:That response didn't answer anything. Your statements are addressing situation before anything happened. The whole thing escalated after my vote on IB, to which he overreacted, which is our whole deal. Your points are absolutely invalid as up until that statement it was obvious a joke-vote stage and up until the IB's accusations, no one was concerned about anything... Which basically renders your whole argument and case invalid.kgb007 wrote:You stated in response to IB getting defensively over the "seems legit" bandwagon vote that IB was looking for an "easy target" but IB had not voted other than his joke vote, I don't have access to a computer for the weekend so maybe someone else can help me out but in my previous post, the first green text is your response and the second green text is me disagreeing with your response

He never actually voted me - it was his reaction after my joke-vote post.pancakemix wrote:So the question then is: who is this easy suspect? Because up to the point when you made this post, IB had only voted one person.
You still struggle to read what I and others have written. "Seems legit" was not a serious reply - in fact, it's a meme, so that was obviously a joke. Your response, however, was not. That's where this whole argument has begun and escalated.Iron Butterfly wrote:I did not over react. I made no accusations. I asked you a simple question, though I forgot to use a question mark. *grin* I would think it was formed as an obvious question.
You love using the word obvious as if it means something. "Obvious" is a matter of perception.
Obviously it was not apparent to you that my comment about the game ending if strike were lynched was a joke. In fact you seemed to believe some believe it could have happened. So the joke was not obvious to you. Obvious to everyone else...but not you, as you had to explain to everyone why that could not be a reality. Get the point??
So please stop using the word Obvious as if it is a valid defense in replying to peoples questions.