What about this one? Hehe, just reach 3168 points and just in only 19 days weeks coming from 1613. Probably luck.
That is CRAZY!!! I'm not sure what is MORE crazy... THE RISE or THE FALL!
You definetly puts you back on this list... but can you tell me how many points you GAINED and how many points you LOST in the 23 triples you played recently (32) It was 17 wins of the 23, but i don't have the time to figure the points, and we need to do this to post an accurate #. thx
What about this one? Hehe, just reach 3168 points and just in only 19 days weeks coming from 1613. Probably luck.
That is CRAZY!!! I'm not sure what is MORE crazy... THE RISE or THE FALL!
You definetly puts you back on this list... but can you tell me how many points you GAINED and how many points you LOST in the 23 triples you played recently (32) It was 17 wins of the 23, but i don't have the time to figure the points, and we need to do this to post an accurate #. thx
And I have fallen quite a bit lately I'm making too many mistakes and not getting enough blind dumb luck like I had when I got my highest score ever...
And I have fallen quite a bit lately I'm making too many mistakes and not getting enough blind dumb luck like I had when I got my highest score ever...
poo-maker wrote:People counted their own scores, and robinette deducted what she thought was a "fair" representation of their team games.
isnt it a little strange that maniac "has" to have 300 points taken off his score
Actually, once someone counted thier own score, it was then verified and if correct they were added to the list. As far as manaic's score, it was spelled out quite clearly in the fine print... and to make it easy for you, I'll post it again: Many problems exisit in trying to create an accurate list of singles only scores with the current scoring system. In an effort to create a fair representation, without encouraging anyone to manipulate any scoring system, this list has been revamped with 2 changes from the original version....
The 1st problem to be addressed was the accuracy of removing team scores. As pointed out earlier in this thread, the higher the ratio of team games the higher the scoring error can be. The solution to this 1st problem is to limit this list to players who focus on singles games, using 88% minimum single games... or no more than 12% being team games.
The 2nd problem was the method of adjusting the score when someone had poor team scores. As pointed out in this thread, intentional team losses would be calculated as point gains in your singles score. The solution to this 2nd problem is to limit the point adjustment to a zero gain effect for the singles score.
Obviously this is not the perfect way to calculate these scores, but it is the best we can do with what we have to work with. There are many who continue to have their fingers crossed that Lack will improve the situation with regards to score calculations in the coming update. I am one of those people.
Scores have been REDUCED to remove any Positive effect from team games
Still no where close to accurate in terms of my score But since there's no way of factoring in when the team games were played, I'll just have to get used to being 300 lower,
Last edited by maniacmath17 on Mon May 14, 2007 1:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top Secret
Highest place: #1
Highest score: 3785
2006-10-25 21:16:00 - NUKE: wtf it says dminus got 2 troops for holding oceania what is that lol
ConquererKing wrote:Am I up on the "knocking on the door" list? I have 2242 right now
You should update you sig...
And to answer your question, the "knockers" are all players that WERE in the top 10, but have fallen out. The list after #10 is NOT comprehensive... but another hundred or so points should do it for you... good luck
I now present to you... Top 10 Highest Singles Players Scores (without team points)
....................... current score .............. current ............. highest ....... .......................... with NO...................... score................. score ....... ........................ team games................(5/22/07)............... ever .......
KomradeKloininov wrote:Shouldn't Gibbom be on there? He got 2252 from the battle royal alone.
Updated 5/22/07
I now present to you... Top 10 Highest Singles Players Scores (without team points)
....................... current score .............. current ............. highest ....... .......................... with NO...................... score................. score ....... ........................ team games..................(5/22/07)............... ever .......
hahaha that made me laugh, but t§o be exactly my score has went up to 2426 as highest score ever thx in advance .
I think gibborn won't keep his points long, just guessing ofc
I now present to you... Top 10 Highest Singles Players Scores (without team points)
....................... current score .............. current ............. highest ....... .......................... with NO...................... score................. score ....... ........................ team games................(6/02/07)............... ever .......
Something is wrong there robin. Laz's score with no team games is higher than his current score. I think you messed up his penalty, or perhaps you just didn't change his current score since its the same as last time.
sully800 wrote:Something is wrong there robin. Laz's score with no team games is higher than his current score. I think you messed up his penalty, or perhaps you just didn't change his current score since its the same as last time.
fixed it
thanks
also, i'll need to know whan any high scores are improved...
if any on this list do so, please post in this thread.
I now present to you... Top 10 Highest Singles Players Scores (without team points)
....................... current score .............. current ............. highest ....... .......................... with NO...................... score................. score ....... ........................ team games................(6/10/07)............... ever .......
I'm making too many mistakes and not getting enough blind dumb luck like I had when I got my highest score ever...
But since there's no way of factoring in when the team games were played, I'll just have to get used to being 300 lower, 
