Concise description: Just use some different terminology like "Archived" or "not nescessary at this time" as opposed to the very harsh: "REJECTED"
How this will benefit the site and/or other comments: Player's feelings may be hurt less when a suggestion is interpreted as "not nescessarily needed at this time" as opposed to "it's shit."
Its what it is. I've seen worse things in the C&A forums where other users tell the person who is complaining of verbal abuse to Suck it up cupcake. As is I'm sure that the Short concise and CLEAR word REJECTED is best used. Because we don't want those suggs back in the forum.
aage wrote: Maybe you're right, but since we receive no handlebars from the mod I think we should get some ourselves.
Funkyterrance wrote:Concise description: Just use some different terminology like "Archived" or "not nescessary at this time" as opposed to the very harsh: "REJECTED"
How this will benefit the site and/or other comments: Player's feelings may be hurt less when a suggestion is interpreted as "not nescessarily needed at this time" as opposed to "it's shit."
Funkyterrance wrote:Yes and I think that "obese" patients ought to be referred to as "big boned" in a medical setting. What's wrong with a little compassion?
Tell it is like it is. If someone is fat just tell them that!... Especially a doctor.. As it goes for CC... Rejected is perfect so nobody gets the idea that something could happen years later.
When we reorganized the Suggestions Forum months ago, this issue was one of the forces that molded the direction we went in. That is why there is a distinction between "rejected" suggestions and those that are simply "archived." As entertaining as the comments have been, I don't feel that we need to unlock this thread at this point. FT, your point is noted, and we are looking into how we have been categorizing suggestions. If anyone has further input on this, feel free to send me a PM.
.. Bad idea IMO
