Moderator: Community Team
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
bedub1 wrote:I look at the contents of it, and I wonder if there is a need here at CC for this.....forum.
Maybe it should go the way of Flame Wars.
Who are you again?bedub1 wrote:I look at the contents of it, and I wonder if there is a need here at CC for this.....forum.
Maybe it should go the way of Flame Wars.
If you don't like it, keep away sunshine. You won't be missed.bedub1 wrote:I look at the contents of it, and I wonder if there is a need here at CC for this.....forum.
Maybe it should go the way of Flame Wars.
Yeah, that's the one that should go. Hell, they have a thread on the demise of the website. That thread (and its participants) are as confusing and confused as bedub posting in off-topics about killing off-topics.jonesthecurl wrote:Do we really need "general discussion"?
Hey bedub... go away little guy.bedub1 wrote:I look at the contents of it, and I wonder if there is a need here at CC for this.....forum.
Maybe it should go the way of Flame Wars.
Not sure if serious.bedub1 wrote:I look at the contents of it, and I wonder if there is a need here at CC for this.....forum.
Maybe it should go the way of Flame Wars.

f*ck more double negatives fucking f*ck.Funkyterrance wrote:Tbh OT is like crack and like crack the world may very well be less miserable without it.
We don't want to hear how miserable your crack is.Funkyterrance wrote:Tbh OT is like crack and like crack the world may very well be less miserable without it.
I should have guessed that poetic license would be missed by the miserable f*cks on OT.Lootifer wrote:f*ck more double negatives fucking f*ck.Funkyterrance wrote:Tbh OT is like crack and like crack the world may very well be less miserable without it.
