Indeed.greenoaks wrote:i'm good with descending order.

Moderator: Community Team
Indeed.greenoaks wrote:i'm good with descending order.

It needs to include the hours/minutes, too.Army of GOD wrote:What's wrong with "May 12, 2013"? That way there is 0 possibility for confusion.

I'd stick with CC. Laptop/Puter users can simply see their local time. Hardly anybody knows what CC time is.koontz1973 wrote:Without reading the thread, is the clock going to only show one time (CC time) or will it show local times but allow to link to CC time.
In the United States we post things like this> Month Day then Yearagentcom wrote:I have a nativist preference for the American way, but I can see putting it in international form. The thing is it's as big a deal when something says "May 02, 2013" when it says 5/2/13.
I know there's talk among the developers of moving it over to the right of the Home|Instructions|Scoreboard|etc. stuff. Given that space might be an issue over there, perhaps it should be put in a more international but shortened format. I would recommend: 2013/05/02 15:24:37. Even us dumb Americans could figure out that means May 2 and not Feb. 5
Using a format like 02/05/2013 has the exact reverse consequence of confusion but the victims would be the Americans who make up over half of the site's users.
koontz1973 wrote:Without reading the thread, is the clock going to only show one time (CC time) or will it show local times but allow to link to CC time.
rdsrds2120 wrote:It needs to include the hours/minutes, too.Army of GOD wrote:What's wrong with "May 12, 2013"? That way there is 0 possibility for confusion.
BMO
Use it but still use the first 3-4 Letters for the month instead of numbers. No confusion.Metsfanmax wrote:Indeed.greenoaks wrote:i'm good with descending order.
Right.. LIke this...Crazy Frog wrote:Use it but still use the first 3-4 Letters for the month instead of numbers. No confusion.Metsfanmax wrote:Indeed.greenoaks wrote:i'm good with descending order.
ThisCrazy Frog wrote:rdsrds2120 wrote:It needs to include the hours/minutes, too.Army of GOD wrote:What's wrong with "May 12, 2013"? That way there is 0 possibility for confusion.
BMO
Right.. LIke this...
13 hrs 27 min. 45 sec
May 16, 2013

greenoaks wrote:i'm not confused by all numbers.
date and time are ordered by size. month will always be in the middle of the date portion.
nothing confusing about that.

Well, my response would've been "takes up too much space." But I didn't make it here in time. Now we have at least one user that I've seen complaining about the clock overflowing onto the buttons at top when using mobile browsers. (You can try this at home by (1) Getting adult supervision and then (2) Resizing your screen.) I hope that problem is limited to a small number of users. As a laptop user, I'm happy with the new feature.Army of GOD wrote:What's wrong with "May 12, 2013"? That way there is 0 possibility for confusion.
Look top-leftArmy of GOD wrote:So did they already get rid of this?
