Moderator: Clan Directors

qwert wrote:left active games
QG1-32
QG2-15
QG3-30
QG4-31
QG5-30
QG6-33
----------
total -171 ( 13%)
if everything be decided for next 7 days- start of second phase could be on 19 may, or 26 may.



not yet, next table update will be 12 may.chemefreak wrote:I'm sorry. Do we know all the sections yet?
jetsetwilly wrote:These were the original dates for phase 2.
1. May 19th
2.June 2nd
3.June 16th
4.June 30th
5. July 14th
6.July 28th
7.Aug 11th
8. Aug 25th
9. Sep 8th
10. Sep 22nd
11. Oct 6th
It's a CD decision but I would suggest it slips 2 weeks to June 2nd. That still sees it finish much earlier than last year.
These dates were chosen to alternate with the random league so I don't think it's wise to go just 1 week or it will clash throughout.
The 12th of May has come.qwert wrote:not yet, next table update will be 12 may.chemefreak wrote:I'm sorry. Do we know all the sections yet?
.
Re: [CL5] Phase 1 - Qualifying Group 3
Postby qwert on Sun Apr 28, 2013 9:11 am
update table and results
soh make big jump, and its going to be big battle for second place
Re: [CL5] Phase 1 - Qualifying Group 3
Postby qwert on Fri May 03, 2013 8:15 am
id-soh, match who could resolve who will be in second place.
Foed have limited chances for second place, but its more depend on how will solve matches against UM8 and AFOS.
Afos are very close to finish hes job before end of all round.
Postby qwert on Sun May 05, 2013 12:48 pm
update table and results.
AFos make big advantage,and in last 3 match need only 2 points so that teoreticaly secure PRemier League.
SOH-ID- and Foed continue battle for second place.
Dyn could ruin chances for ID, because its 4-1 for DYn, and these potential defeat could push SOH to the second place
Re: [CL5] Phase 1 - Qualifying Group 3
Postby danryan on Fri May 10, 2013 10:51 am
Wow, this is so close I can't figure out who is leading for second right now. Congratulations to the fisters.
User avatar
Captain danryan
Is this still the case? There are twice as many teams in the league rounds as in the qualification rounds. It would seem like 2 uses per map (against different opponents) would make more sense.qwert wrote: Maps
NO Beta.
Clan's can use one map only once in Qualification Round and once in League Round.
Random maps can be used as many times as so desired and what ever map it turns out to be will not be counted towards the 1 map rule.

Right now it looks like we'll have to figure out what our 88th best/favorite map is.Doc_Brown wrote:Is this still the case? There are twice as many teams in the league rounds as in the qualification rounds. It would seem like 2 uses per map (against different opponents) would make more sense.qwert wrote: Maps
NO Beta.
Clan's can use one map only once in Qualification Round and once in League Round.
Random maps can be used as many times as so desired and what ever map it turns out to be will not be counted towards the 1 map rule.
Yup, this was stated up front and it was always going to make phase 2 more interesting !Doc_Brown wrote:Is this still the case? There are twice as many teams in the league rounds as in the qualification rounds. It would seem like 2 uses per map (against different opponents) would make more sense.qwert wrote: Maps
NO Beta.
Clan's can use one map only once in Qualification Round and once in League Round.
Random maps can be used as many times as so desired and what ever map it turns out to be will not be counted towards the 1 map rule.

make more sense? Consider that we have 235 maps, i dont see how 88 different maps for League phase dont have sense?Doc_Brown wrote:Is this still the case? There are twice as many teams in the league rounds as in the qualification rounds. It would seem like 2 uses per map (against different opponents) would make more sense.qwert wrote: Maps
NO Beta.
Clan's can use one map only once in Qualification Round and once in League Round.
Random maps can be used as many times as so desired and what ever map it turns out to be will not be counted towards the 1 map rule.
No worries. I wasn't involved with any clans with CL5 was being discussed, so I just wanted to check on the situation. Thanks.qwert wrote: make more sense? Consider that we have 235 maps, i dont see how 88 different maps for League phase dont have sense?
We discussed all this,way before start of CL5, and we came to conclusion, that for any clan who play in CL5, knowledge of 88 different maps are not are any obstacle, and that everybody can handle with this.
Every clan have enough time to prepare 88 diferent maps out of 235(except random who can use withouth restrictions)

The rule here says a player may play a maximum of 6 games per league week. Then it says a player may play 3 in one and 3 in another. Is this just an example? Can a player play 4 in one and 2 in another (i.e. he/she does not exceed 6)?Players
In one Qualification/League Week,one player can play maximum 6 game. One week consist of two round,this mean that every player can play 3 in one and 3 in other round.


this was clarified previously, max 3 and 3 i believe.Chariot of Fire wrote:Can you please clarify one of the rules re player quota.....
The rule here says a player may play a maximum of 6 games per league week. Then it says a player may play 3 in one and 3 in another. Is this just an example? Can a player play 4 in one and 2 in another (i.e. he/she does not exceed 6)?Players
In one Qualification/League Week,one player can play maximum 6 game. One week consist of two round,this mean that every player can play 3 in one and 3 in other round.



yeah, im pretty sure we had this debate already. and the answer was "mine rule is write clear"Chariot of Fire wrote:Ah right, OK thanks. If that is the case then the rule should be rewritten to make this clearer. "A player may play a maximum of three games against the same opposition in any one League Week"



uckuki wrote:max # of games per player:
6 in one week. is it max 3 per round, or it can be 4-2 or 5-1 etc?
tx
jetsetwilly wrote:It's a max of 3 in each.
shortly after...qwert wrote:in one week player can play maximum 6 games, and consider that one week have 2 round, these its split even (3+3) , its good explained in rules
chapcrap wrote:No, that's not a good explanation. It's best to say 3 games per round is the maximum. Saying 6 per week makes it sound like they can be split up.qwert wrote:in one week player can play maximum 6 games, and consider that one week have 2 round, these its split even (3+3) , its good explained in rules


f*ck you, I can't stop laughing.IcePack wrote:yeah, im pretty sure we had this debate already. and the answer was "mine rule is write clear"Chariot of Fire wrote:Ah right, OK thanks. If that is the case then the rule should be rewritten to make this clearer. "A player may play a maximum of three games against the same opposition in any one League Week"