Moderator: Community Team

It says OVERALL.. You must play freestyle to be the best overall player on the site. The OP is a freestyler, so I'm sure he's including freestyle into seeing who the best is.Mr Changsha wrote:The strongest overall player should be the best player from the most legitimate style. Jack-of-all trades can't be the strongest overall, for how can a player be the strongest if they aren't the best at anything?
So by my own standards (at least), I can make a claim..for I am certainly one of the best standard flat/no card players. My trips rate is at 68% or so...and my games are all completely legitimate and against strong opposition.
Am I the strongest? No.
But the strongest player (and I have a few in my mind) would be one we could say "Yes, he is the best at (for example sequential standard escalating) and he is also excellent at sequential team games". That's the best player.
Freestyle players in my view aren't even in the running for this.
Like hell you have to play freestyle to be the best overall player on this site. Not everyone has the connection (including me) to play freestyle or for that matter the time. Everyone can play sequentially, it is a level-playing field, which is why the strongest player would be the best sequential player.Gabriel13 wrote:It says OVERALL.. You must play freestyle to be the best overall player on the site. The OP is a freestyler, so I'm sure he's including freestyle into seeing who the best is.Mr Changsha wrote:The strongest overall player should be the best player from the most legitimate style. Jack-of-all trades can't be the strongest overall, for how can a player be the strongest if they aren't the best at anything?
So by my own standards (at least), I can make a claim..for I am certainly one of the best standard flat/no card players. My trips rate is at 68% or so...and my games are all completely legitimate and against strong opposition.
Am I the strongest? No.
But the strongest player (and I have a few in my mind) would be one we could say "Yes, he is the best at (for example sequential standard escalating) and he is also excellent at sequential team games". That's the best player.
Freestyle players in my view aren't even in the running for this.

Just to re-iterate what Gabriel13 said; it is overall player.Mr Changsha wrote:Like hell you have to play freestyle to be the best overall player on this site. Not everyone has the connection (including me) to play freestyle or for that matter the time. Everyone can play sequentially, it is a level-playing field, which is why the strongest player would be the best sequential player.Gabriel13 wrote:It says OVERALL.. You must play freestyle to be the best overall player on the site. The OP is a freestyler, so I'm sure he's including freestyle into seeing who the best is.Mr Changsha wrote:The strongest overall player should be the best player from the most legitimate style. Jack-of-all trades can't be the strongest overall, for how can a player be the strongest if they aren't the best at anything?
So by my own standards (at least), I can make a claim..for I am certainly one of the best standard flat/no card players. My trips rate is at 68% or so...and my games are all completely legitimate and against strong opposition.
Am I the strongest? No.
But the strongest player (and I have a few in my mind) would be one we could say "Yes, he is the best at (for example sequential standard escalating) and he is also excellent at sequential team games". That's the best player.
Freestyle players in my view aren't even in the running for this.


This sounds like him to me, thenBruceswar wrote:Poo-maker was from Ireland and he dominated in many settings. Freestyle included. He could play seq esc, flat rate, assassin, team games. He did it all. I dare someone to find me someone who did it better than poo-maker.
No mage, you have the strongest overall CONNECTION on this siteMageplunka69 wrote:I am ♥
OMG my name mentioned in this thread???macbone wrote:Uckuki always plays under the radar, but I remember checking into a tournament standard game today to see that he had it all wrapped up. He goes about his work with the dedication of craftsman, and I consider my greatest victory a sudden death series versus him. He consistently outclasses me in any game I play with him.
I second the danryan nomination.
Deli is another strong player in both team and standard games.
I've been very impressed with Janomike, too.
mc05025 is scary good as well.
There are other players who are masters of team or standard play, but those five are who I think of when I think of well-rounded players.

You have a point and yes, probably the more efficient way of going about this would be to make separate threadsThe Voice wrote:Arguing for or against a player as the strongest overall is a waste of time b/c people will throw more weight on certain settings to match their individual biases. How about a thread that asks everyone to contemplate the best player for specific settings (best freestyler, best with nukes, best at manual, etc.)?
Nothing will stop all the bitching:PNoSurvivors wrote:
I know, I know, pretty opinionated, but I honestly think you guys should all read this post thoroughly, because it will hopefully stop all the bitching.
-Glorious Leader
so gay,,,,silversun6 wrote:first of all i did think of you and about hudds actually , but decided not to
we can play ofc, but it would mean nothing... i need to have fun playing games, and playing just to be better then someone is not fun for mesilversun6 wrote:by the way , you and me are 5-5 , so i challenge you to an 1vs1 antarctica game (or team or whatever other map) ,because you are 2-0 ahead of me , and i consider it to be my favorite map![]()
but you are mixing apple and oranges. you simply should not compare seq and freestyle on any scale.NoSurvivors wrote:Teebow is a shit QB. So you are wrong there, lol. However you make a point. However, what does it matter? WELL ROUNDED DOES NOT MEAN THE BEST.freakns wrote:sequential and freestyle have nothing in common, except maybe playing at same maps... its like you are saying that Rodgers and Tebow are both good QBs, but Tebow is better because he can also be good tight end. well, good for him, but ill take Rodgers any day of week and twice on sunday
Geez, before commenting in a thread, read what it's about.

No question.Bruceswar wrote:chemefreak wrote:L M S wrote:Back in the day, when Danryan still had hair....for my money he was the best overall player on CC.+3macbone wrote: I second the danryan nomination.
I would throw chariot of fire and bruceswar in the mix when it comes to overall ability.
Thanks Cheme, but the best to ever play this game hands down... poo-maker Nobody else is close and I mean no disrespect to anybody else. He was just that good.
freakns wrote:someone being able to beat low level players at both freestyle and sew means shit if seq experts or freestyle experts would beat him at their specialties.
True, you have a few very good points, however teebow is the best overall player if you put it that way.. put teebow up against brade as a running back, and that pussy brady wont do shit all. Or in any othe rposition for that matter, however from the QB position brady is the closest thing to a god, lol. But that is you circling back to mixing up total and one setting. Brady is good at one setting and sucks at the others. Teebow is average at all settings. I would say brady is definately the better player, however not the more well rounded, so again, you kinda missed the point a bit. However I do understand what you are trying to say. Being average at everything still makes you average. However it makes you well rounded. Now for instance if someone held the rank of colonel while doing well consistently on all settings, wouldn't that make a whole lot more sense for being a well rounded person than a guy with general from playing team games solely? Yes.NoSurvivors wrote:I would consider well rounded to be a player who does not shy away from games on any settings. Maybe 250 GAMES (not necessarily wins, but games) on each setting shows a well rounded player. Of course, they must do this be attaining a highish rank (major + IMO, if not higher).
freakns wrote:(as i said, there is no best)
I am playing both sides here, because I agree with bits and pieces on both sides of this (stupid, really..) freestyle debate that has arisen. However you only use some of my post to make me look like an idiot, so thanks for that, lol.NoSurvivors wrote:However, it is well rounded players, and they are few and far between
You've made good points.NoSurvivors wrote:I am playing both sides here, because I agree with bits and pieces on both sides of this (stupid, really..) freestyle debate that has arisen. However you only use some of my post to make me look like an idiot, so thanks for that, lol.
I am not one of those people preaching freestyle. As I said, it is one in 21 different settings. not even 5% of the settings. Therefore, it isnt very important to determining the most well rounded player, but it is a factor indeed. So don't say it isn't. That is like one of the freestylers saying "team players shouldn't count because its just one setting and it involves people leeching off teammates." It just doesnt work like that lol.
God when will this bullshit end? Lol.
I try, lol. If I am dedicated to a topic I can write all day. Unfortunately I have been recycling the same stuff for about 3 posts and people still dont get itDukasaur wrote:You've made good points.NoSurvivors wrote:I am playing both sides here, because I agree with bits and pieces on both sides of this (stupid, really..) freestyle debate that has arisen. However you only use some of my post to make me look like an idiot, so thanks for that, lol.
I am not one of those people preaching freestyle. As I said, it is one in 21 different settings. not even 5% of the settings. Therefore, it isnt very important to determining the most well rounded player, but it is a factor indeed. So don't say it isn't. That is like one of the freestylers saying "team players shouldn't count because its just one setting and it involves people leeching off teammates." It just doesnt work like that lol.
God when will this bullshit end? Lol.
Some days, it's enough to know you did the right thing even if nobody agreed...


I played exactly one (ONE!) game with josko as a partner in a random dubs matchup. In that one game I probably learned more than in any other single game I've played on CC.niMic wrote:I don't know about overall (freestyle and all), but the best player I've ever played with is probably josko. And I've teamed with some amazing players (or else I would probably never make it past Major).
That explains the 1 I received from you for my gameplay rating and the clueless label to go along with that.silversun6 wrote:silversun6 wrote:with out a doubt - mc05025
ill expand my first comment,
on single and double games at tourneys, i only felt the underdog against HA, swifte and shoop ,
team mate - those are my top 3 picks - benga (when he isnt drunk ! ) uckuki and dkmaster , and from those i play against those must be Josko and Cof
and last with settings i like most (8 player esc foggy) i fear those : mc05025 , dkmaster and knigm
the main reason i picked mc is because he was the only player from top 5/10 who joined my private 3000/3500 + regularly when he had 4000/4500 points , which is admirable.
oh - and im clueless on freestyle , so i wont pick there..