stoicbird wrote:Outlaw Islam outright! This is the only answer and I know it sounds stupid and extreme but its the only way to preserve freedom for women, homo's and other minority groups (women are not a minority group).
Yes I agree, this is stupid. Muslims in the UK are also a minority group, so you figure banning their religion is a way to protect them?
It's the UK and religious beliefs do not place anyone above the law. Criminal actions should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
For your future reference; "homo" is derogatory slang and considered by many to be bigoted hate speech. So watch your step dude.
Please tell me that you were being sarcastic in your last paragraph.
Yes maybe banning Islam outright in Britain is a drastic measure. Most muslims are law abiding people. And their societies are are democratic and peaceful. If not there would be European and US armies intervening to help in multiple Islamic states. Oh wait.......
stoicbird wrote:Outlaw Islam outright! This is the only answer and I know it sounds stupid and extreme but its the only way to preserve freedom for women, homo's and other minority groups (women are not a minority group).
Yes I agree, this is stupid. Muslims in the UK are also a minority group, so you figure banning their religion is a way to protect them?
It's the UK and religious beliefs do not place anyone above the law. Criminal actions should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
For your future reference; "homo" is derogatory slang and considered by many to be bigoted hate speech. So watch your step dude.
Please tell me that you were being sarcastic in your last paragraph.
Yes maybe banning Islam outright in Britain is a drastic measure. Most muslims are law abiding people. And their societies are are democratic and peaceful. If not there would be European and US armies intervening to help in multiple Islamic states. Oh wait.......
The definition of an Islamic state would be one that ruled by Shariah law , are you under the impression that Egypt , Libya , Tunisia , Syria fall into that category As for Europe the only case of religious genocide in recent times was in the Balkans where Nationalist Christians raped and slaughtered thousands of Muslims , women and children included, how does that fit into your paranoid delusions ? What about Equitorial Africa , wholesale slaughter for decades and barely a Muslim to be seen,or India where your peace loving Hindus have shown how much respect they have for minorities, or indeed women.
stoicbird wrote:Outlaw Islam outright! This is the only answer and I know it sounds stupid and extreme but its the only way to preserve freedom for women, homo's and other minority groups (women are not a minority group).
Yes I agree, this is stupid. Muslims in the UK are also a minority group, so you figure banning their religion is a way to protect them?
It's the UK and religious beliefs do not place anyone above the law. Criminal actions should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
For your future reference; "homo" is derogatory slang and considered by many to be bigoted hate speech. So watch your step dude.
Please tell me that you were being sarcastic in your last paragraph.
Yes maybe banning Islam outright in Britain is a drastic measure. Most muslims are law abiding people. And their societies are are democratic and peaceful. If not there would be European and US armies intervening to help in multiple Islamic states. Oh wait.......
The definition of an Islamic state would be one that ruled by Shariah law , are you under the impression that Egypt , Libya , Tunisia , Syria fall into that category As for Europe the only case of religious genocide in recent times was in the Balkans where Nationalist Christians raped and slaughtered thousands of Muslims , women and children included, how does that fit into your paranoid delusions ? What about Equitorial Africa , wholesale slaughter for decades and barely a Muslim to be seen,or India where your peace loving Hindus have shown how much respect they have for minorities, or indeed women.
Slaughter in the Balkans, Africa and Hindu's disrespect of women. Now I'm finding it hard to find the link to ISlamic Terrorism/Extremism in Britain. Possibly these cases justify the behaviour of extremists in your mind. If so you need help in functioning as a normal human being.
Seriously though, never have a read such a load of tripe. Do you have a release date from whatever mental institution that you're in?
stoicbird wrote:Outlaw Islam outright! This is the only answer and I know it sounds stupid and extreme but its the only way to preserve freedom for women, homo's and other minority groups (women are not a minority group).
Yes I agree, this is stupid. Muslims in the UK are also a minority group, so you figure banning their religion is a way to protect them?
It's the UK and religious beliefs do not place anyone above the law. Criminal actions should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
For your future reference; "homo" is derogatory slang and considered by many to be bigoted hate speech. So watch your step dude.
Please tell me that you were being sarcastic in your last paragraph.
Yes maybe banning Islam outright in Britain is a drastic measure. Most muslims are law abiding people. And their societies are are democratic and peaceful. If not there would be European and US armies intervening to help in multiple Islamic states. Oh wait.......
The definition of an Islamic state would be one that ruled by Shariah law , are you under the impression that Egypt , Libya , Tunisia , Syria fall into that category As for Europe the only case of religious genocide in recent times was in the Balkans where Nationalist Christians raped and slaughtered thousands of Muslims , women and children included, how does that fit into your paranoid delusions ? What about Equitorial Africa , wholesale slaughter for decades and barely a Muslim to be seen,or India where your peace loving Hindus have shown how much respect they have for minorities, or indeed women.
Slaughter in the Balkans, Africa and Hindu's disrespect of women. Now I'm finding it hard to find the link to ISlamic Terrorism/Extremism in Britain. Possibly these cases justify the behaviour of extremists in your mind. If so you need help in functioning as a normal human being.
Seriously though, never have a read such a load of tripe. Do you have a release date from whatever mental institution that you're in?
Oh, what a well balanced individual you are proving yourself to be.
I really thank you for this thread, its been a while since someone was willing to step up and just utterly humiliate themselves for the sake of entertainment for a while.
Last edited by AAFitz on Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
I'm Spanking Monkey now....err...I mean I'm a Spanking Monkey now...that shoots milk Too much. I know.
john9blue wrote:i think AAFitz was joking... you can never really be sure with him, though.
I've heard Americans using the term "sand diggers" to describe Arabs in the past. Maybe he thinks I'm implying something along those lines. I didn't intend that but he can read into it what he likes (it seems he's on his own planet so who cares what he thinks). The guy must be 60ish if his father fought in WWII so I can understand his propensity to whine at everything. Bless him.
Thanks John, of course it was a joke.
Id say you dont have a sense of humor stoic, but you are calling me a whiner in a thread where you are bashing an entire religion, their people based on their religions beliefs, and suggesting outlawing that religion outright.
My joke was kind of funny, from my point of view, but you sir, are fucking hysterical.
I'm Spanking Monkey now....err...I mean I'm a Spanking Monkey now...that shoots milk Too much. I know.
stoicbird wrote:Outlaw Islam outright! This is the only answer and I know it sounds stupid and extreme but its the only way to preserve freedom for women, homo's and other minority groups (women are not a minority group).
Yes I agree, this is stupid. Muslims in the UK are also a minority group, so you figure banning their religion is a way to protect them?
It's the UK and religious beliefs do not place anyone above the law. Criminal actions should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
For your future reference; "homo" is derogatory slang and considered by many to be bigoted hate speech. So watch your step dude.
Please tell me that you were being sarcastic in your last paragraph.
He wasnt, and I for one fully expect you will end up banned before long due to your posts in this thread, all joking aside.
I'm Spanking Monkey now....err...I mean I'm a Spanking Monkey now...that shoots milk Too much. I know.
john9blue wrote:i think AAFitz was joking... you can never really be sure with him, though.
I've heard Americans using the term "sand diggers" to describe Arabs in the past. Maybe he thinks I'm implying something along those lines. I didn't intend that but he can read into it what he likes (it seems he's on his own planet so who cares what he thinks). The guy must be 60ish if his father fought in WWII so I can understand his propensity to whine at everything. Bless him.
Thanks John, of course it was a joke.
Id say you dont have a sense of humor stoic, but you are calling me a whiner in a thread where you are bashing an entire religion, their people based on their religions beliefs, and suggesting outlawing that religion outright.
My joke was kind of funny, from my point of view, but you sir, are fucking hysterical.
I find it amusing how he'll go through a wall of text to nitpick a joke, but completely ignores rational discussion... then again, that would imply rationality on his part
John Adams wrote:I have come to the conclusion that one useless man is called a disgrace, that two are called a law firm, and that three or more become a Congress! And by God I have had this Congress!
stoic, that word may be common among the people you hang with, but you would be in the minority opinion on the web. It is widely considered derogatory slang and as such is hate speech. So I suggest you find another way to express yourself about homosexuals.
"Diggers" as you likely already know is not the word, but the actual slang is not appropriate for this forum either.
Also, it is extremists of all religious persuasions that is the problem and not Muslims. If all religious people actually practiced the tenets of their faiths none of them would be a source of violence against others.
Also I thought the usual variation of Sand Diggers was those annoying tossers who drive around beach towns with surfboards on the roof of their Rav4, fluro raybans and no intention of ever catching a wave.
I go to the gym to justify my mockery of fat people.
Wow. I spend 3 hours a day commuting, and do nothing during that time other than listen to Shakespeare and think of insulting, miserable things to say in this forum in order to make the world a worse place. And yet, stoic makes me seem like Mother Teresa. I call bs.
stoicbird wrote:Outlaw Islam outright! This is the only answer and I know it sounds stupid and extreme but its the only way to preserve freedom for women, homo's and other minority groups (women are not a minority group).
Yes I agree, this is stupid. Muslims in the UK are also a minority group, so you figure banning their religion is a way to protect them?
It's the UK and religious beliefs do not place anyone above the law. Criminal actions should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
For your future reference; "homo" is derogatory slang and considered by many to be bigoted hate speech. So watch your step dude.
Please tell me that you were being sarcastic in your last paragraph.
Yes maybe banning Islam outright in Britain is a drastic measure. Most muslims are law abiding people. And their societies are are democratic and peaceful. If not there would be European and US armies intervening to help in multiple Islamic states. Oh wait.......
The definition of an Islamic state would be one that ruled by Shariah law , are you under the impression that Egypt , Libya , Tunisia , Syria fall into that category As for Europe the only case of religious genocide in recent times was in the Balkans where Nationalist Christians raped and slaughtered thousands of Muslims , women and children included, how does that fit into your paranoid delusions ? What about Equitorial Africa , wholesale slaughter for decades and barely a Muslim to be seen,or India where your peace loving Hindus have shown how much respect they have for minorities, or indeed women.
Slaughter in the Balkans, Africa and Hindu's disrespect of women. Now I'm finding it hard to find the link to ISlamic Terrorism/Extremism in Britain. Possibly these cases justify the behaviour of extremists in your mind. If so you need help in functioning as a normal human being.
Seriously though, never have a read such a load of tripe. Do you have a release date from whatever mental institution that you're in?
You appear to have dodged the question so I will ask once again , do you think Egypt , Libya , Tunisia and Syria are Islamic states ? As for the remainder of my post I shall account for your imbecility by dumbing down the point I was making , now read carefully; As Certain groups of Hindus and Christians have recently been responsible for atrocities then should these religions also be banned , or should just Islam be singled out ?
stoicbird wrote:Outlaw Islam outright! This is the only answer and I know it sounds stupid and extreme but its the only way to preserve freedom for women, homo's and other minority groups (women are not a minority group).
Yes I agree, this is stupid. Muslims in the UK are also a minority group, so you figure banning their religion is a way to protect them?
It's the UK and religious beliefs do not place anyone above the law. Criminal actions should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
For your future reference; "homo" is derogatory slang and considered by many to be bigoted hate speech. So watch your step dude.
Please tell me that you were being sarcastic in your last paragraph.
Yes maybe banning Islam outright in Britain is a drastic measure. Most muslims are law abiding people. And their societies are are democratic and peaceful. If not there would be European and US armies intervening to help in multiple Islamic states. Oh wait.......
The definition of an Islamic state would be one that ruled by Shariah law , are you under the impression that Egypt , Libya , Tunisia , Syria fall into that category As for Europe the only case of religious genocide in recent times was in the Balkans where Nationalist Christians raped and slaughtered thousands of Muslims , women and children included, how does that fit into your paranoid delusions ? What about Equitorial Africa , wholesale slaughter for decades and barely a Muslim to be seen,or India where your peace loving Hindus have shown how much respect they have for minorities, or indeed women.
Slaughter in the Balkans, Africa and Hindu's disrespect of women. Now I'm finding it hard to find the link to ISlamic Terrorism/Extremism in Britain. Possibly these cases justify the behaviour of extremists in your mind. If so you need help in functioning as a normal human being.
Seriously though, never have a read such a load of tripe. Do you have a release date from whatever mental institution that you're in?
You appear to have dodged the question so I will ask once again , do you think Egypt , Libya , Tunisia and Syria are Islamic states ? As for the remainder of my post I shall account for your imbecility by dumbing down the point I was making , now read carefully; As Certain groups of Hindus and Christians have recently been responsible for atrocities then should these religions also be banned , or should just Islam be singled out ?
Christians have also limited, and are trying to limit freedoms of a great number of people as well, including homosexuals and women.
Should Christianity also be outlawed?
I'm Spanking Monkey now....err...I mean I'm a Spanking Monkey now...that shoots milk Too much. I know.
AAFitz wrote: Christians have also limited, and are trying to limit freedoms of a great number of people as well, including homosexuals and women.
Should Christianity also be outlawed?
It has been in several places. People have been killed for being Christian in several places not all due to Islamic governments either.
Not to mention all the outlawing and killing of Christians by different denominations of Christianity and other religions.Incredibly sad really,killing each other over varying speculations about the unknowable..
AAFitz wrote: Christians have also limited, and are trying to limit freedoms of a great number of people as well, including homosexuals and women.
Should Christianity also be outlawed?
It has been in several places. People have been killed for being Christian in several places not all due to Islamic governments either.
Not to mention all the outlawing and killing of Christians by different denominations of Christianity and other religions.Incredibly sad really,killing each other over varying speculations about the unknowable..
AAFitz wrote: Christians have also limited, and are trying to limit freedoms of a great number of people as well, including homosexuals and women.
Should Christianity also be outlawed?
It has been in several places. People have been killed for being Christian in several places not all due to Islamic governments either.
Not to mention all the outlawing and killing of Christians by different denominations of Christianity and other religions.Incredibly sad really,killing each other over varying speculations about the unknowable..
Sad, why?
Just seems absurd to me to kill someone for their opinions on such an intangible matter.Of course a more Marxist position would be that all disputes are ultimately economic,and religion among others is used merely as a pretext.
AAFitz wrote: Christians have also limited, and are trying to limit freedoms of a great number of people as well, including homosexuals and women.
Should Christianity also be outlawed?
It has been in several places. People have been killed for being Christian in several places not all due to Islamic governments either.
Not to mention all the outlawing and killing of Christians by different denominations of Christianity and other religions.Incredibly sad really,killing each other over varying speculations about the unknowable..
Sad, why?
Just seems absurd to me to kill someone for their opinions on such an intangible matter.Of course a more Marxist position would be that all disputes are ultimately economic,and religion among others is used merely as a pretext.
Except if you belong to Yahushua, governments, economics and even religion can not control you. The only way to stop that is to kill them under the pretense that it will prevent others from finding what they have.
That was why all his deciples were killed in nasty ways, to prevent people following him. Otherwise it might get out of hand.
