Moderator: Community Team
Well through not voting, you are supporting a lynch on edoc.NoSurvivors wrote:Honestly I am at a toss up. I do think edoc has made far better rebuddles than betiko has, but I don't think I want to place a vote yet.. IB was right. your vote means more in this game than in others.
this just makes me laugh. Another example of circular argument as edoc would say. In this game more than any other there isn't going to be time for any case on day 1, scumarining is the best thing to do for everyone. I know all my votes so far have been for stupid reasons (jokevote+post jokevote stages), but you all know that your vote no matter what will be for stupid reasons. A claim will make us start somewhere. I'd rather make someone claim randomly than lynch someone randomly.jonty125 wrote:unvote, vote betiko for suggesting a claim from someone based on jokevotes and voting edoc for being a smart-ass which is not a crime.
I disagree with edoc's logic, but he actually doesn't vote for betiko or vodean he just puts an idea out there.

Lulwut? Betiko is not a calm player. He ALWAYS jumps at the first sign of a case on him. The game I remember most is Arkham where he claimed bomb. He got such a strong case on him BECAUSE he got pissed at the first sign of a case and started going off on errbody. So with that I Vote Edoc for knowing the only cases today will be made of meta, but yet messing up on the meta of another player by goign 180 degrees in the wrong direction. I dont know why, but you arent seeming like the same player either Edoc. Something jsut doesnt feel right here. Call it my gut, but for whatever reason you just dont seem to be following your meta.edocsil wrote:Betiko, you just used a circular argument. There is nothing random about my suggested lynch (also for the record, I would chose vodean over you, you tend to be a far calmer player. I suggested a culling of the weak so to speak. If I wanted a RL I would have just unvoted and let the night come. If I was scum, that's what I should do anyhow. A RL favors scum and everyone fucking knows it. I want to stop a RL at all costs.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
Actually it seems you are the one who has said the worst thing, which ruins your premise on both Betiko and Vodean.edocsil wrote:I would rather die then even bother claiming for the crap that you three think you can pull.
A. Both of my subjects directly OMGUSed. This completely validates my claim that they are the worst players in the game and use little logic for their votes
B. IB, your point is invalid. Idgaf that there is a "case" of jokes on vode, it's irrelevant to my opinion. Call me a Liar if you can, Who has the worst Meta for saying things at the worst of times, and forcing us to hang them?
C.Wtf? This is totally withing my meta. I'm a dick, and I will always sacrifice another player then myself in RL.i'll vote edoc for playing more out of character.
I'd agree with this sentiment but there is a danger of falling into a mass claim if it gets out of hand. It's better to take the info you have sometimes and NL (not an option here, but my point stands).Iron Butterfly wrote:Contrary to what some players have expressed about day one claims I for one believe day one claims are very important. They supply a starting point to focus on for a variety of reasons.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
Lol. Calmer than vode? Of course he is Its not saying much, but I think betio is the better of the two. Vode is just scummy. All the time. So here is how this is going to go.ghostly447 wrote:Lulwut? Betiko is not a calm player. He ALWAYS jumps at the first sign of a case on him. The game I remember most is Arkham where he claimed bomb. He got such a strong case on him BECAUSE he got pissed at the first sign of a case and started going off on errbody. So with that I Vote Edoc for knowing the only cases today will be made of meta, but yet messing up on the meta of another player by goign 180 degrees in the wrong direction. I dont know why, but you arent seeming like the same player either Edoc. Something jsut doesnt feel right here. Call it my gut, but for whatever reason you just dont seem to be following your meta.edocsil wrote:Betiko, you just used a circular argument. There is nothing random about my suggested lynch (also for the record, I would chose vodean over you, you tend to be a far calmer player. I suggested a culling of the weak so to speak. If I wanted a RL I would have just unvoted and let the night come. If I was scum, that's what I should do anyhow. A RL favors scum and everyone fucking knows it. I want to stop a RL at all costs.
What does this say. It says that of the two Betico is calmer the Vodean. Not that Betico is calm. Nice job ghostly and others.There is nothing random about my suggested lynch (also for the record, I would chose vodean over you, you tend to be a far calmer player.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Hence why I am more likely to just give the finger, see my above argument. I have fairly definitively proven my points, and show how all of those voting me are wrong or misguided. If that isn't enough, my claim won't help. I'll point the blame as I see fit before I die. I can guess a few of the people on the wagon who are town, and frankly should be embarrassed of themselves, I can also name one person who I can be sure is scum to a fair degree of certainty. However, I doubt I can steer the wagon at them within 24 hours.pancakemix wrote:I'd agree with this sentiment but there is a danger of falling into a mass claim if it gets out of hand. It's better to take the info you have sometimes and NL (not an option here, but my point stands).Iron Butterfly wrote:Contrary to what some players have expressed about day one claims I for one believe day one claims are very important. They supply a starting point to focus on for a variety of reasons.
I'd agree that edoc's only course of action now is to claim. It probably won't save him, but it'll give him the chance.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Yes, and if it isn't ghostly's it's a scum DV/secret voter so be careful.new guy1 wrote:Very nice eyes, I completely looked over it, Im guessing a double voter.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
IB. He is really the one person I didn't expect to get on the wagon. I can't legitimately tell you to hang him for a pure gut instinct, but if I had a inv/block/other toys I personally would be inclined to it on him tonight.new guy1 wrote:Well, give me the player you think is scum, and since Im not going for your case, I will put my vote on them. That way, if town decides to lynch you, no harm no foul. If we decide we will pursue him, it's one less vote that you must gather to turn it around.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
LOL an OMGYS vote via proxy. I put pressure on you for the simple reason of how you played Vodian and Betiko. What I am about to say is not personal but I have always hated the elitist attitude of certain players who seem to think that it is OK to sacrifice other players because they deem their play is not on par with those who have more experience. They are not good enough to sit at the cool table so they are most expendable.edocsil wrote:IB. He is really the one person I didn't expect to get on the wagon. I can't legitimately tell you to hang him for a pure gut instinct, but if I had a inv/block/other toys I personally would be inclined to it on him tonight.new guy1 wrote:Well, give me the player you think is scum, and since Im not going for your case, I will put my vote on them. That way, if town decides to lynch you, no harm no foul. If we decide we will pursue him, it's one less vote that you must gather to turn it around.
Really? Did you even read what I said? Have you read the rules? We don't have a choice, we HAVE TO random lynch today. Why? Because the mod won't allow a no lynch! At the time of the above post we had no Night Actions (duh, it's Day 1), no scum tells and a fast approaching deadline. Vodean had the most votes so logically we should just get a claim from him since he's as good as anyone else.new guy1 wrote:Well if you want to do a random lynch, then why dont you look at Edocsil's alternative? He posted right above you suggesting vodean/betiko and you seem to be settled for just random lynching vodean. Since from past experience vodean wont claim and will likely take the lynch, I would rather look into betiko because if we discover he is a PR or something then we can always gather enough pressure to lynch vodean in the end. This is a relatively silent game, so I guess it needs to start somewhere, vote soundman for being content with a random lynch.soundman wrote:Unvote. Well no one has done anything suspicious yet so that leaves us with a random lynch. It's looking like Vodean is going to be the target at this point. I say if he has an important role then he should claim.
any reason everyone is just following whatever edoc says and defending him? i feel like edoc basically just said "f*ck you all" and we were like "yup, f*ck us hard". edoc has not presented any form of adequate defense, and his claim had premises that i disagree with, and conclusions which i dont believe. i really dont know what the hel new guy is doing, but he needs to stop.Iron Butterfly wrote: Unvote vote Gregwolf
I was trying to make a point and get a claim from Edoc as there really has not been leads.
However After my above post I saw that Gregwolf has not posted or contributed anything. If I had to choose between Edocsil and Gregwolf to lynch I would choose Gregwolf.
If you wish to save Edoc then vote Gregwolf. If it comes down to random lynching, which in essence is what day one has been about then lynch the inactive.
I would suggest Vodean and Betiko remove their vote on Edoc.

Its your vote and Edocsil made his own bed.vodean wrote:any reason everyone is just following whatever edoc says and defending him? i feel like edoc basically just said "f*ck you all" and we were like "yup, f*ck us hard". edoc has not presented any form of adequate defense, and his claim had premises that i disagree with, and conclusions which i dont believe. i really dont know what the hel new guy is doing, but he needs to stop.Iron Butterfly wrote: Unvote vote Gregwolf
I was trying to make a point and get a claim from Edoc as there really has not been leads.
However After my above post I saw that Gregwolf has not posted or contributed anything. If I had to choose between Edocsil and Gregwolf to lynch I would choose Gregwolf.
If you wish to save Edoc then vote Gregwolf. If it comes down to random lynching, which in essence is what day one has been about then lynch the inactive.
I would suggest Vodean and Betiko remove their vote on Edoc.
and soundman there is a difference between a random lynch and a D1 lynch. thats what cases are for.