Moderator: Community Team
Reality is enough for most of us. No fantasies or science fiction movie special effects necessaryGillipig wrote:Stop the presses! Big news coming up! Obama IS Marxist! Someone said so and therefore it must be true.
In other news, Aliens will invade earth within the next five years! Scienece fiction writer forsees the future in his new book.
I'm going to change this a little (because I like the scenario).Nola_Lifer wrote:Let say all Obama wants to do is take money for the wealthiest people. That would be the people at the top, the 1%ers. If he does do this and gives take breaks to lower and middle class people, wouldn't that mean more money for you, PS? I am assuming your not a kabillionaire. Wouldn't you want more money? I am saying this as someone who probably won't vote for Obama so don't but this "O your a liberal" bullshit on me.
I want more of my own hard earned money. I don't want to "try to get" other people's earned money.Nola_Lifer wrote:Let say all Obama wants to do is take money for the wealthiest people. That would be the people at the top, the 1%ers. If he does do this and gives take breaks to lower and middle class people, wouldn't that mean more money for you, PS? I am assuming your not a kabillionaire. Wouldn't you want more money? I am saying this as someone who probably won't vote for Obama so don't but this "O your a liberal" bullshit on me.
Because some people realize it's wrong to use the government to take money from someone else just so they can give some of it to you. For all the accusations of greed thrown at those who don't want higher taxes on "the rich", you have just precisely pointed out where the real greed in our society lies that the media never questions.Nola_Lifer wrote:Let say all Obama wants to do is take money for the wealthiest people. That would be the people at the top, the 1%ers. If he does do this and gives take breaks to lower and middle class people, wouldn't that mean more money for you, PS? I am assuming your not a kabillionaire. Wouldn't you want more money? I am saying this as someone who probably won't vote for Obama so don't but this "O your a liberal" bullshit on me.
LOLNight Strike wrote:Because some people realize it's wrong to use the government to take money from someone else just so they can give some of it to you. For all the accusations of greed thrown at those who don't want higher taxes on "the rich", you have just precisely pointed out where the real greed in our society lies that the media never questions.Nola_Lifer wrote:Let say all Obama wants to do is take money for the wealthiest people. That would be the people at the top, the 1%ers. If he does do this and gives take breaks to lower and middle class people, wouldn't that mean more money for you, PS? I am assuming your not a kabillionaire. Wouldn't you want more money? I am saying this as someone who probably won't vote for Obama so don't but this "O your a liberal" bullshit on me.
Yes not many knows this. There's a lot of misconceptions around in the world. A lot of things that at first glance, appear simple. But chwhen you tink a little, it al becomes more complicated. You tsee, chwhen you use your mighty bräin, the word "wealthy" is relative, and can be applied to anyone who is whealthy in respect to another person. Even the poorest sods in the US are still richer than the average Somalis. So one might say (with a wicked perspective) that your irony was unfounded.BigBallinStalin wrote:I never knew that the wealthy forced the politicians to implement Medicare and Medicaid.
...unless they control the media and thus their image???????????????thegreekdog wrote:That's a virtually impossible scenario. Marxists cannot get elected in our current system because no one would give them any campaign money.Phatscotty wrote:I see what you are saying. I think he is Progressive and influenced by Marx because of what he stands for (what he says he stands for), ad based on his past, which included being directly tutored for years by Marxist Frank Marshall Davis, Jeremiah Wright, Reverand Wallace, his own words in his book "seeking out Marxist professors", the hand picked appointments of the straight up, self admitted Communists, admitted Maoists, admitted Marxists etc as Czars. I can only imagine what those Czars are doing, not like we will ever know much of the truth concerning them.
I'm going to have to be talked into changing my mind about this. Thanks for trying you made some good points. Just one question: if a Marxist got elected into a capitalist system, would the Marxist take advantage of Crony Capitalism?
Again, you're still focused on what he did in the past and not what he's done as president. If he is elected again, serves another four year term, and does nothing Marxist, would you then be willing to admit he's not a Marxist?
Actually, it's Obama voters. A study out today shows that the average Obama voters median tax rate is 3%. The average Romney voters median tax rate is 17%PLAYER57832 wrote:LOLNight Strike wrote:Because some people realize it's wrong to use the government to take money from someone else just so they can give some of it to you. For all the accusations of greed thrown at those who don't want higher taxes on "the rich", you have just precisely pointed out where the real greed in our society lies that the media never questions.Nola_Lifer wrote:Let say all Obama wants to do is take money for the wealthiest people. That would be the people at the top, the 1%ers. If he does do this and gives take breaks to lower and middle class people, wouldn't that mean more money for you, PS? I am assuming your not a kabillionaire. Wouldn't you want more money? I am saying this as someone who probably won't vote for Obama so don't but this "O your a liberal" bullshit on me.
Its not the middle class failing to pay their share that put us in debt, sorry..
Darn it! I tried to do inspector Clouseau. Turns out I've dragged Sean Connery's good name through the mud instead. Though I didn't include any violence towards women so it couldn't have been THAT authenticBigBallinStalin wrote:@gillipig
Haha, yeah... I was reading Sean Connery in your post, then I lost it after the 6th sentence.
It could've used more exclamation points, and some references to <crazy arm movements, fidgets in wheelchair> woulda helped... =P
They are not why we are going bankrupt, but many wealthy do benefit from Medicare.. as do their older relatives.BigBallinStalin wrote:I never knew that the wealthy forced the politicians to implement Medicare and Medicaid.
So your theory is that our tax breaks most of us got giving us an extra 100-200 kin our paychecks last year are why the deficit is so high?Phatscotty wrote:Actually, it's Obama voters. A study out today shows that the average Obama voters median tax rate is 3%. The average Romney voters median tax rate is 17%PLAYER57832 wrote:LOLNight Strike wrote:Because some people realize it's wrong to use the government to take money from someone else just so they can give some of it to you. For all the accusations of greed thrown at those who don't want higher taxes on "the rich", you have just precisely pointed out where the real greed in our society lies that the media never questions.Nola_Lifer wrote:Let say all Obama wants to do is take money for the wealthiest people. That would be the people at the top, the 1%ers. If he does do this and gives take breaks to lower and middle class people, wouldn't that mean more money for you, PS? I am assuming your not a kabillionaire. Wouldn't you want more money? I am saying this as someone who probably won't vote for Obama so don't but this "O your a liberal" bullshit on me.
Its not the middle class failing to pay their share that put us in debt, sorry..
And yet conservatives and libertarians oppose those things and the government mandates that forced banks to provide more and more riskier loans while promising the full backing of those toxic assets by the government. The government forced banks to up their toxic loan percentage to 10% from 1%, so of course there was going to be a horrible fallout coming. When some Republicans (even Bush) tried to warn that the housing bubble was going to collapse, it was the Democrats like Barney Frank who refused to listen to those calls of reform and swore that the housing market was sound. But no, we have to get the government even more involved in how the private sector works.PLAYER57832 wrote:LOLNight Strike wrote:Because some people realize it's wrong to use the government to take money from someone else just so they can give some of it to you. For all the accusations of greed thrown at those who don't want higher taxes on "the rich", you have just precisely pointed out where the real greed in our society lies that the media never questions.Nola_Lifer wrote:Let say all Obama wants to do is take money for the wealthiest people. That would be the people at the top, the 1%ers. If he does do this and gives take breaks to lower and middle class people, wouldn't that mean more money for you, PS? I am assuming your not a kabillionaire. Wouldn't you want more money? I am saying this as someone who probably won't vote for Obama so don't but this "O your a liberal" bullshit on me.
Its not the middle class failing to pay their share that put us in debt, sorry.. it very much is the wealthy -- corporate discounts, bank bail outs.
How do the wealthy have enough money to pay for all those things? You can have a 100% tax on income over $1 million and not have enough money to run the government for 1 month (assuming everyone keeps their pay rates exactly where they are). We have a spending problem, not a taxation problem. We have 47% of the population who does not pay any federal income taxes. Why can't they pay at least 1% instead of demanding more money from the other half of the country? THAT is the true us vs them that is present in the country today: those who are making money and paying taxes and those who demand the government give them more handouts.PLAYER57832 wrote:The reason our government has had to expand so much is to protect people from the many abuses by corporations... Even so, they were not ENOUGH to prevent BP, Massey Energy, Madoff or many other debacles. THEY are why we need to increase taxes. And it is far more correct that the wealthy, who have money, pay those additional amounts than it is to cut school lunches, food for the elderly, healthcare for the poor and education funding.
It's not a theory, it's a statement.PLAYER57832 wrote:So your theory is that our tax breaks most of us got giving us an extra 100-200 kin our paychecks last year are why the deficit is so high?Phatscotty wrote:Actually, it's Obama voters. A study out today shows that the average Obama voters median tax rate is 3%. The average Romney voters median tax rate is 17%PLAYER57832 wrote:LOLNight Strike wrote:Because some people realize it's wrong to use the government to take money from someone else just so they can give some of it to you. For all the accusations of greed thrown at those who don't want higher taxes on "the rich", you have just precisely pointed out where the real greed in our society lies that the media never questions.Nola_Lifer wrote:Let say all Obama wants to do is take money for the wealthiest people. That would be the people at the top, the 1%ers. If he does do this and gives take breaks to lower and middle class people, wouldn't that mean more money for you, PS? I am assuming your not a kabillionaire. Wouldn't you want more money? I am saying this as someone who probably won't vote for Obama so don't but this "O your a liberal" bullshit on me.
Its not the middle class failing to pay their share that put us in debt, sorry..
Yet you want taxes lowered even more?
Never mind that your figures are wrong, your logic is quite flawed.


We know, we know...Phatscotty wrote:I ain't goin nowhere!

Dukasaur wrote:It has recently been revealed that Karl Marx had a secret meeting with Obama.