Moderator: Community Team
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Did you see him on here?safariguy5 wrote:Claim Mr. Squirrel?
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
I'd like to start my defense by pointing this out here. Your case was scummy as shit. In fact, I have hardly ever seen a case more scummy. If Happy hadn't turned up scum, the tables would be flipped right now and it would be your head on the chopping block. I honestly don't think I should have to defend my attacks against you. I was chasing a lead just the same as you were. Your lead was more successful than mine, but just because I was (likely) wrong doesn't mean I'm scum.edocsil wrote:Yesterday my "Noob Lynch" was considered scummy as shit, and largely with good reason.
I made this quote when happyfeet had only two votes on him (if my count is correct). Thats still quite a ways away from being threatening. Also, the idea that I was "testing the waters" holds no water whatsoever. I voted you less than twelve hours after I made that post and a majority of the town was in agreement with you. If I had been testing the waters, I would not have jumped in I like I did.edocsil wrote:This was an easy position to take advantage of, but also keeps his hands moderately clear of both the case against me, and the defense of Happy. It was a good way to test the waters to see if any traction could be made against me.Mr. Squirrel wrote:Lynch the rookies? Really? That's a terrible idea. Just because someone is new doesn't mean they're scum. And what if we have a mafia full of experienced players? Then we are essentially helping them win. Major FOS to you and new guy (who agreed with you).edocsil wrote:If we don't get anything going here I am going to advocate lynch the rookies. I should have some time to read tonight to see if I can find something better, but I will place a vote one way or another tonight.
Now, I could understand lynching the inactives (such as happyfeet), but that is drastically different from "lynching the rookies".
By this logic, anytime anyone asks someone for a claim that means they are scumbuddies. You wanted a claim, I wanted a claim, the whole town wanted a claim. So my post is more passive-aggressive, so what? Thats how I write.edocsil wrote:Now here he is coaching his scum partner into an attempt to keeping himself alive. Honestly, if Happy would have claimed some halfway decent power role instead of voting me (and following Mr. S's lead in that vote) I think the case would have crumbled in the final hours.Mr. Squirrel wrote: I think you missed the part in edocsil's post where he asked for a claim.
You might have a pair to GUESS that the scum have fakes but you can't be sure. I've played many games where they don't get them. Its not uncommon. Even in themed games. It sucks, but it happens.edocsil wrote:Here he washes his hands of a ally that is sure to be a liability if he doesn't remove himself. He does this at the same time as he questions the existence of fakes. This is a transparent attempt to imply that he could not possibly be scum. I have the pair to say that scum have fakes. They must, it's the only prevention to a mass claim. To really even imply otherwise would really be mocking Chap's ability to mod a game, especially for a flavor game like this.Mr. Squirrel wrote:Honestly, unless he has an absolutely perfect claim with proof of his innocence, I want to see him lynched now. His lack of a claim makes me think that he doesn't have one to give.
Does anyone know if chap usually gives fakeclaims to scum?
In short, Mr. S worked too hard to defend Happy when he thought he could still get away with it, and I am calling him out for it.
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
That's one of four IIRC? And busdriver for administrator? Also, actions are required to verify he is a BD at all, and he was kind enough to forget to post them.new guy1 wrote:The idea was proposed, but after looking up the name, she is the board director. She is very important in the series because everytime NCIS has to do something extreme she must be asked first. Thats what I got from what I watched of the series. Shes also Gibb's ex wife if I remember correctly. Its a bold thing to fake claim, IMO.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
edocsil wrote:That's one of four IIRC? And busdriver for administrator? Also, actions are required to verify he is a BD at all, and he was kind enough to forget to post them.new guy1 wrote:The idea was proposed, but after looking up the name, she is the board director. She is very important in the series because everytime NCIS has to do something extreme she must be asked first. Thats what I got from what I watched of the series. Shes also Gibb's ex wife if I remember correctly. Its a bold thing to fake claim, IMO.
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Lying. 100% certain. Hang me if I am wrong.Mr. Squirrel wrote:edocsil wrote:That's one of four IIRC? And busdriver for administrator? Also, actions are required to verify he is a BD at all, and he was kind enough to forget to post them.new guy1 wrote:The idea was proposed, but after looking up the name, she is the board director. She is very important in the series because everytime NCIS has to do something extreme she must be asked first. Thats what I got from what I watched of the series. Shes also Gibb's ex wife if I remember correctly. Its a bold thing to fake claim, IMO.![]()
N1: No action. Didn't want to screw up other people's night actions.
N2: Switched chuck with Isaiah to protect chuck.
N3: Switched CM5 with Isaiah. Decided protecting chuck at this point might not be worth it (since we weren't sure of sanity) and tried to protect CM5. Backfired I guess.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
edocsil wrote:Lying. 100% certain. Hang me if I am wrong.Mr. Squirrel wrote:edocsil wrote:That's one of four IIRC? And busdriver for administrator? Also, actions are required to verify he is a BD at all, and he was kind enough to forget to post them.new guy1 wrote:The idea was proposed, but after looking up the name, she is the board director. She is very important in the series because everytime NCIS has to do something extreme she must be asked first. Thats what I got from what I watched of the series. Shes also Gibb's ex wife if I remember correctly. Its a bold thing to fake claim, IMO.![]()
N1: No action. Didn't want to screw up other people's night actions.
N2: Switched chuck with Isaiah to protect chuck.
N3: Switched CM5 with Isaiah. Decided protecting chuck at this point might not be worth it (since we weren't sure of sanity) and tried to protect CM5. Backfired I guess.
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.

Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
edocsil wrote:SHIT. I had things going so well after 2 positive scum hunts too. I wish you had given me a heads up their Mr. S, there are things I would have said before you died.
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Oh, and go town. After handing you 2 scum I think I manage to secure you victory largely by accident.edocsil wrote:SHIT. I had things going so well after 2 positive scum hunts too. I wish you had given me a heads up their Mr. S, there are things I would have said before you died.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Quite. If you had gone and nuked someone else, I would have stood a good chance of winning. But I won't say more till after the game is done.Mr. Squirrel wrote:edocsil wrote:SHIT. I had things going so well after 2 positive scum hunts too. I wish you had given me a heads up their Mr. S, there are things I would have said before you died.![]()
This has been terribly unfortunate for both of us
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
I can confirm this, I now too have my Dinozzo role back. Vote Safariguy!strike wolf wrote:I've thought about it and I think it's best to reveal what I know. I was recruited by Edocsil night 1 but upon his death I have again become town. Its true Isaiah was cult as well (recruited last night) which is how Edoc knew that Mr. Squirrel was lying. When Edoc died we both reverted back to being townies. I regained my original role and I don't see any reason Isaiah hasn't as well.
As for what happened N2. Me and Edocsil thought the best target would be Gibbs.. Apparently however Gibbs proved to be unrecruitable or otherwise protected from recruitment (probably the former).
My role is relatively minor in nature. As town I was a minor investigative role (which is why I believed more than most of you that Ziva was paranoid (I guess she's most likely insane unless there's another reason Isaiah's role would come up guilty)). However when I was recruited into cult, my role advanced, I was able to investigate people and see who would make a willing cult. On N2 I tried to investigate Safariguy but as you know I was role blocked. On N3 I again investigated Safari and was told he would not make a willing cult. This means that either Safari is scum (if Edocsil had attempted to recruit mafia he would have died) or unrecruitable. There's basically two roles I feel definitively probably wouldn't be recruitable, one of them is dead and the other would have been Ziva (former Israeli operative. strongly loyal. her being seduced by cult didn't make much sense in my eyes). So I would propose town to vote Safariguy
Also for the record, if Edocsil had any ability beyond recruiting, he did not tell me (lead to believe he didn't have any).