What's the point of even replacing? Obviously no one cares in this game.everywhere116 wrote:I'm too lazy to come up with anything, so let's vote the active replacement who said he would have killed me.
Vote chapcrap
Mr. Squirrel, you're next...
Moderator: Community Team
What's the point of even replacing? Obviously no one cares in this game.everywhere116 wrote:I'm too lazy to come up with anything, so let's vote the active replacement who said he would have killed me.
Vote chapcrap
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
we have killed two scum. yastrike wolf wrote:have I been avenged yet?

I care a great deal. You said you would have killed him last night and never explained why. I even asked and you never answered. I'd call that grounds for a vote. Especially considering you've been acting pretty abrasive since you walked through the door.chapcrap wrote:What's the point of even replacing? Obviously no one cares in this game.everywhere116 wrote:I'm too lazy to come up with anything, so let's vote the active replacement who said he would have killed me.
Vote chapcrap
Mr. Squirrel, you're next...
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
How about this, I will explain, if you tell me who you would have killed.pancakemix wrote:I care a great deal. You said you would have killed him last night and never explained why. I even asked and you never answered. I'd call that grounds for a vote. Especially considering you've been acting pretty abrasive since you walked through the door.chapcrap wrote:What's the point of even replacing? Obviously no one cares in this game.everywhere116 wrote:I'm too lazy to come up with anything, so let's vote the active replacement who said he would have killed me.
Vote chapcrap
Mr. Squirrel, you're next...
hmm... i think that since it is YOU people are looking at in terms of the only potential case of the day atm, it is YOU who should answer. Yes, maybe PCM should answer too... it could give us some info, but i really think that it is YOU who needs to take the initiative, and kinda just accept that pressure is moving in your direction.chapcrap wrote:How about this, I will explain, if you tell me who you would have killed.pancakemix wrote:I care a great deal. You said you would have killed him last night and never explained why. I even asked and you never answered. I'd call that grounds for a vote. Especially considering you've been acting pretty abrasive since you walked through the door.chapcrap wrote:What's the point of even replacing? Obviously no one cares in this game.everywhere116 wrote:I'm too lazy to come up with anything, so let's vote the active replacement who said he would have killed me.
Vote chapcrap
Mr. Squirrel, you're next...
And about me being abrasive... I don't think so. Just pointing out mistakes people make.

I'm next? Who's gonna attack me, the town or you?chapcrap wrote:What's the point of even replacing? Obviously no one cares in this game.everywhere116 wrote:I'm too lazy to come up with anything, so let's vote the active replacement who said he would have killed me.
Vote chapcrap
Mr. Squirrel, you're next...
chapcrap wrote:Thanks for reading up too! Just want to straighten you out about something though. It wasn't a case. It was a question. I understand the confusion because typically, people end questions with question marks, not periods. For further clarification, you should ask PCM. I don't know if you should use a question mark or not when you ask. I don't understand his rules or grasp of grammar.Mr. Squirrel wrote:Alright guys, I'm all read up now.
I'll wait to see if dj can pull through again before I comment on chap's case.
Actually, he pretty much is proven. Quit trying to cast doubt where there is none.chapcrap wrote:First of all, you aren't proven in anyway.vodean wrote:uh... im not sure why... if you have anything specific you would like to voice, go ahead and ask. i will answer to the best of my abilities. Is there anyone else who does not feel comfortable with my claim? Because if not, now might be the time to pressure chap, who is pressuring a proven (essentially, based on my ability to reveal info on flavor and thor's actions) townie. i mean, yeah, he might have some legitimate concerns, but i dont know... right now, with no other cases, seems like it could get the ball rolling.
Second, are you gonna go ahead and go full out OMGUS or what?
I think any logical person wouldn't have targeted anyone last night when there were no clear targets for scum, and its not lylo. That said, you declared that you not only would've killed someone, but you named that person. You must have an explanation, unless you are just trying to appear scummy.chapcrap wrote:How about this, I will explain, if you tell me who you would have killed.pancakemix wrote: I care a great deal. You said you would have killed him last night and never explained why. I even asked and you never answered. I'd call that grounds for a vote. Especially considering you've been acting pretty abrasive since you walked through the door.
And you are contributing nothing in return. If you want to point out out mistakes, fine. But if all you are going to do is sit there and criticize without giving us anything to go on, you will be gathering quite a bit of suspicion.chapcrap wrote:And about me being abrasive... I don't think so. Just pointing out mistakes people make.
If this is the case, you definitely don't want to waste that last question. You should probably make a batch claim. Something like, "Player X, Y, and Z are all town." If it comes up as true, then you just cleared three townies. If its false, we have a much smaller pool of people we can either investigate or kill in order to catch the scum.Djfireside wrote:Figured I would give some clarification in reading through this.
My power is not once a day/night I have a limited amount which leaves me with one left.
1) I forced vodean to say that they are town. Granted they thought I was a idiot for asking but they came back truthful.
2) I asked myself if Safari and Clever are town. I got back that I was lying and went after Safari and came back scum.
On my list I can assume vodean is clean because of my power. Clever I can not because, as the logic statement goes, 1 or both could be scum. We know one was but the other is not certain.
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
PCM said there wasn't a case.Mr. Squirrel wrote:You don't think there's a case on you?
there isnt much of a case... or at least there wasnt. its getting stronger. and MS drew up a nice long post. you picked ONE thing to respond to. please respond to all of them. i will be voting you if you do not.chapcrap wrote:PCM said there wasn't a case.Mr. Squirrel wrote:You don't think there's a case on you?

This is getting ridiculous, but fine. The reason I responded to one thing is because I was obviously making a mockery of what was going on here and Mr. S took it serious and completely skimmed if he didn't realize what I said the first time.vodean wrote:there isnt much of a case... or at least there wasnt. its getting stronger. and MS drew up a nice long post. you picked ONE thing to respond to. please respond to all of them. i will be voting you if you do not.chapcrap wrote:PCM said there wasn't a case.Mr. Squirrel wrote:You don't think there's a case on you?
PCM. He'll attack you with "questions" for other people.Mr. Squirrel wrote:I'm next? Who's gonna attack me, the town or you?chapcrap wrote:What's the point of even replacing? Obviously no one cares in this game.everywhere116 wrote:I'm too lazy to come up with anything, so let's vote the active replacement who said he would have killed me.
Vote chapcrap
Mr. Squirrel, you're next...
PCM said that it wasn't a case, it was a question. Stop skimming and you'd understand that. He didn't even know the details of DJ's investigatory powers, so why wouldn't he pick someone to go after?Mr. Squirrel wrote:chapcrap wrote:Thanks for reading up too! Just want to straighten you out about something though. It wasn't a case. It was a question. I understand the confusion because typically, people end questions with question marks, not periods. For further clarification, you should ask PCM. I don't know if you should use a question mark or not when you ask. I don't understand his rules or grasp of grammar.Mr. Squirrel wrote:Alright guys, I'm all read up now.
I'll wait to see if dj can pull through again before I comment on chap's case.You don't think there's a case on you?
Seriously?
PCM would not be questioning you (or trying to get dj to clear you) without reason. While its possible that he might be trying to waste dj's investigations, I don't think this is the case.
How is he proven? All that is proven is that DJ cleared him as town. That doesn't mean that it's true. DJ could obviously be lying.Mr. Squirrel wrote:Actually, he pretty much is proven. Quit trying to cast doubt where there is none.chapcrap wrote:First of all, you aren't proven in anyway.vodean wrote:uh... im not sure why... if you have anything specific you would like to voice, go ahead and ask. i will answer to the best of my abilities. Is there anyone else who does not feel comfortable with my claim? Because if not, now might be the time to pressure chap, who is pressuring a proven (essentially, based on my ability to reveal info on flavor and thor's actions) townie. i mean, yeah, he might have some legitimate concerns, but i dont know... right now, with no other cases, seems like it could get the ball rolling.
Second, are you gonna go ahead and go full out OMGUS or what?
I never said I didn't have an explanation for it. I said I would answer when PCM stated who he would have killed.Mr. Squirrel wrote:I think any logical person wouldn't have targeted anyone last night when there were no clear targets for scum, and its not lylo. That said, you declared that you not only would've killed someone, but you named that person. You must have an explanation, unless you are just trying to appear scummy.chapcrap wrote:How about this, I will explain, if you tell me who you would have killed.pancakemix wrote: I care a great deal. You said you would have killed him last night and never explained why. I even asked and you never answered. I'd call that grounds for a vote. Especially considering you've been acting pretty abrasive since you walked through the door.
That's an opinion. I feel like I am contributing.Mr. Squirrel wrote:And you are contributing nothing in return. If you want to point out out mistakes, fine. But if all you are going to do is sit there and criticize without giving us anything to go on, you will be gathering quite a bit of suspicion.chapcrap wrote:And about me being abrasive... I don't think so. Just pointing out mistakes people make.
That's a good idea. And I think it's probably wise to do before mafia try to target you.Mr. Squirrel wrote:If this is the case, you definitely don't want to waste that last question. You should probably make a batch claim. Something like, "Player X, Y, and Z are all town." If it comes up as true, then you just cleared three townies. If its false, we have a much smaller pool of people we can either investigate or kill in order to catch the scum.Djfireside wrote:Figured I would give some clarification in reading through this.
My power is not once a day/night I have a limited amount which leaves me with one left.
1) I forced vodean to say that they are town. Granted they thought I was a idiot for asking but they came back truthful.
2) I asked myself if Safari and Clever are town. I got back that I was lying and went after Safari and came back scum.
On my list I can assume vodean is clean because of my power. Clever I can not because, as the logic statement goes, 1 or both could be scum. We know one was but the other is not certain.
Fair enough. Given the lack of leads compelling enough to risk busdriver shenanigans, I doubt I would have shot anyone. I kinda agree with Thor's decision, that's part of why I asked the question in the first place.chapcrap wrote:How about this, I will explain, if you tell me who you would have killed.
I beg to differ.And about me being abrasive... I don't think so. Just pointing out mistakes people make.
chapcrap wrote:What's the point of even replacing? Obviously no one cares in this game.
Mr. Squirrel, you're next...
Thanks for reading up too! Just want to straighten you out about something though. It wasn't a case. It was a question. I understand the confusion because typically, people end questions with question marks, not periods. For further clarification, you should ask PCM. I don't know if you should use a question mark or not when you ask. I don't understand his rules or grasp of grammar.
^^And that's why.The reason I responded to one thing is because I was obviously making a mockery of what was going on here and Mr. S took it serious and completely skimmed if he didn't realize what I said the first time.
Well, if that isn't just the darndest word-twisting I ever saw.chapcrap wrote:PCM said there wasn't a case.Mr. Squirrel wrote:You don't think there's a case on you?
You know why I said that. Stop harping on it.PCM. He'll attack you with "questions" for other people.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
I'm not trying to harp on anything. I was compelled to respond to the post. I didn't bring it up.pancakemix wrote:You know why I said that. Stop harping on it.
I'm not gonna start calling out the J-word, but it really seems like you are trying to set yourself up here. That's just my opinion.
AHHHHH HE SAID ITchapcrap wrote:I'm not trying to harp on anything. I was compelled to respond to the post. I didn't bring it up.pancakemix wrote:You know why I said that. Stop harping on it.
I'm not gonna start calling out the J-word, but it really seems like you are trying to set yourself up here. That's just my opinion.
And I'm not a stinking Jester... Or did you mean jewel?
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
I'm not sure you know edoc that well.pancakemix wrote:AHHHHH HE SAID ITchapcrap wrote:I'm not trying to harp on anything. I was compelled to respond to the post. I didn't bring it up.pancakemix wrote:You know why I said that. Stop harping on it.
I'm not gonna start calling out the J-word, but it really seems like you are trying to set yourself up here. That's just my opinion.
And I'm not a stinking Jester... Or did you mean jewel?
Really, though, edoc wouldn't do that because he's not a bastard.

No he isn't.vodean wrote:and now he seems to be soft-claiming the j-word, so definitely time to kill him vote chapcrap
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
Thaat wasn't my perogative. Since DJ didn't think it was wise to use his remaining power to determine if you are scum, I figured we should conduct an old fashioned pressure vote to get a claim and gauge you reaction (which you don't seem to have done very well in the latter category.)chapcrap wrote:What's the point of even replacing? Obviously no one cares in this game.everywhere116 wrote:I'm too lazy to come up with anything, so let's vote the active replacement who said he would have killed me.
Vote chapcrap
Mr. Squirrel, you're next...
hmm... it is possible. Mr. S, we will undoubtedly be moving to you next, since your character haas been BWed already. So do you want to just claim now and save us the trouble?/ wrote:The case on chap is interesting, but I don't know, maybe it's just the meta talking but, I don't think he'd press so hard if scum, or maybe I just don't remember chap's meta...
It is worthy of a FOS, but I have one other case in mind first.
Vote Mr S
Clever has been hitting my scumdar HARD since day one.
He's been trying to convince us that Thor is a SK, he claimed some BS beloved super princessbomb, and despite DJ confirming that saf and/or him was lying, Saf refused to vote him and he refused to vote saf, even though if I were in that situation it would be the only logical conclusion I could have drawn as town. I can only conclude he was lying, and most likely the last scum.

hm? are you posting in the right game?vodean wrote:hmm... it is possible. Mr. S, we will undoubtedly be moving to you next, since your character haas been BWed already. So do you want to just claim now and save us the trouble?/ wrote:The case on chap is interesting, but I don't know, maybe it's just the meta talking but, I don't think he'd press so hard if scum, or maybe I just don't remember chap's meta...
It is worthy of a FOS, but I have one other case in mind first.
Vote Mr S
Clever has been hitting my scumdar HARD since day one.
He's been trying to convince us that Thor is a SK, he claimed some BS beloved super princessbomb, and despite DJ confirming that saf and/or him was lying, Saf refused to vote him and he refused to vote saf, even though if I were in that situation it would be the only logical conclusion I could have drawn as town. I can only conclude he was lying, and most likely the last scum.
What? Weakest voting reason ever. Especially since I specifically said I was not a jester...vodean wrote:and now he seems to be soft-claiming the j-word, so definitely time to kill him vote chapcrap
Because he seemed scummy to me. When I read through, he wasn't adding anything to the discussion and multiple times went a week without posting. And when he did, it was just a one liner. Let's take a look, starting after the joke voting stopped:pancakemix wrote:At any rate, I answered the question, chap. Now will you explain why you'd have killed everywhere?
That is a post about Meta. Nothing super signifigant.everywhere116 wrote:Possibly because of the connections with a game that saf has all knowledge of.freezie wrote:I also don't see why Edoc intervened on this one...Meta is definitly not a good way to build a real case, but in this particular case..it's somewhat a valid note for day 1. I don't see why everyone jumped for this.
everywhere116 wrote:Ginsberg?
6 days later, he has a couple of posts about strike's chronic auto correct issues. So, instead of commenting on a case, he comments on that. Obviously following along, but no contribution.everywhere116 wrote:Ah. I see. Hilary us. Carrie on.pancakemix wrote:Strike's post autocorrected. I'm just making fun of him.everywhere116 wrote:Ginsberg?
Questions vodean about Thor mason claim on May 31.everywhere116 wrote:Didn't you just tell us that you're a mason, though?
He went over two weeks without posting and then posted this. Defends saf early in the case against him.everywhere116 wrote:Wait, how does saf being targeted by the vig signify him being scum? Can you clarify that for me? I agree he was acting somewhat scummy yesterday, but I don't see how this tips the scales./ wrote:Well, there was the matter of him and jonty defending each other.
But, this new evidence does seem incriminating, vote saf, any ideas why night may have turned out this way?
everywhere116 wrote:All of the scenes used to come with disclaimers that no game related info would be provided. Now people are divining info from the scenes./ wrote:Well, since the mod has said the scene is innacurate, I suppose the case of the target being the potential killer isn't really there anymore, Unvote.
So, I guess the only legitimate case remains in clever, then?
Continues with a more veiled defense saying that CLEVER is the only legitimate case. And then tries to poke holes in CLEVER's claim.everywhere116 wrote:Your claim isn't without it's doubts. Freyr wasn't associated with a hammer (That's Thor's thing); he was a fertility god that was associated with a magical sword (phallic symbolism definitely intended). Although he is very important and I would expect him to be in the game.Some7hingCLEVER wrote:i will claim now since i dont know when i will be back on.
i am the FREYR when i am killed my hammer dies along with me and when i die i result a double night meaning two nights follow so mafia would get more kills (i assume thats how it works i was only told it was a double night.)
Once it's clear that saf is going to be lynched, he goes ahead and votes him.everywhere116 wrote:In that case, Vote saf
I've got a feeling your words will be forgotten due to Chap's far more elaborate post, so I guess I'll address them now before they are./ wrote: Vote Mr S
He's been trying to convince us that Thor is a SK, he claimed some BS beloved super princessbomb, and despite DJ confirming that saf and/or him was lying, Saf refused to vote him and he refused to vote saf, even though if I were in that situation it would be the only logical conclusion I could have drawn as town. I can only conclude he was lying, and most likely the last scum.
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Indeed, my mistake, but he unvoted while the whole "clever or saf is lying" was going on, which doesn't make sense to me.everywhere116 wrote:/, your post is good, but there is a factual error in your post. Saf did vote for Clever; he was the second person to do so.