[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1091: Undefined array key 0 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1091: Trying to access array offset on null [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Undefined array key 0 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Trying to access array offset on null [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Undefined array key 0 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Trying to access array offset on null Gay Adoption - Page 2 - Conquer Club
IF that is true (and I have no idea), that is quite humorous and sad at the same time.
But it can't be true, because I heard that allowing gay marriage would lead to beastiality, not the other way around.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
I'd like to know what constitutes a "lax" bestiality law. Is a monkey off-limits, for instance? We're just one chromosome away. That's like prosecuting someone who's 18 years old + 1 day for having sex with a 17 year old.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
Phatscotty wrote:I haven't laughed that hard in a while
Which part was funny?
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
Woodruff wrote: But it can't be true, because I heard that allowing gay marriage would lead to beastiality, not the other way around.
It will lead to gay adoption
Is it a problem for children to be raised in loving homes instead of on the street?
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
Grab a case of Dr Pepper for me and a bottle of vodka for pwn Saxi. Do you want any Canadian Mountain Dew, it doesn't have caffeine and tastes slightly mellower.
2dimes wrote:Grab a case of Dr Pepper for me and a bottle of vodka for pwn Saxi. Do you want any Canadian Mountain Dew, it doesn't have caffeine and tastes slightly mellower.
Phatscotty wrote:If you guys want to talk to me on the issue of marriage, this is the place to do it. I refuse to post any longer in threads that have lies in their titles that are meant to libel bigotry onto certain groups of people and promote hatred and get people riled up and at each others throats. I refuse to participate in no gay allows in North Carolina thread, simply because gays are allowed in North Carolina.
You had to wait until page 29 of that thread to make this stand?
I wonder what the real reason is.
the real reasons is the reason I stated. Symmetry's thread is built on a lie. I don't want any part of it.
Assuming this is true we'll chalk it up at lies in topic titles: Symmetry 1 Phatscotty 200+
Phatscotty wrote:If you guys want to talk to me on the issue of marriage, this is the place to do it. I refuse to post any longer in threads that have lies in their titles that are meant to libel bigotry onto certain groups of people and promote hatred and get people riled up and at each others throats. I refuse to participate in no gay allows in North Carolina thread, simply because gays are allowed in North Carolina.
You had to wait until page 29 of that thread to make this stand?
I wonder what the real reason is.
the real reasons is the reason I stated. Symmetry's thread is built on a lie. I don't want any part of it.
Assuming this is true we'll chalk it up at lies in topic titles: Symmetry 1 Phatscotty 200+
If he supports consensual associations, which don't initiate coercion against others, then he'd have to say "yes, of course, lootifer" in order to be a good libertarian.
Social conservatives generally seem to balk at the notion of supporting gay marriage probably because they view marriage as an institution which is only legitimate if it is in accord with (their) tradition and/or with the Book (Torah, Quran, Bible). Nevertheless, they refuse to acknowledge as correct other traditions and other justifications which enable any consenting adults to be married.
patrickaa317 wrote:On the flip side, did you know that you can marry a horse in 0 states but can have homosexual intercourse in 50 states+DC?
Untrue. http://www.sodomy.org/laws/ it's a bit out of date, because some of the laws are technically on the books but have been found by the courts to be unconstitutional. However, I know at least Alabama is still on the books and has not been challenged.