Until someone admits to not picking up on the soft claim that isn't a valid fos.SPARTACUS1974 wrote: For doom he tried his best to make sure that every1 new that jak was the doc and that again does seem scummy to me fos doom
Moderator: Community Team
Until someone admits to not picking up on the soft claim that isn't a valid fos.SPARTACUS1974 wrote: For doom he tried his best to make sure that every1 new that jak was the doc and that again does seem scummy to me fos doom
LOL funny one doom,thats like when I asked the skimmers to just admit that they were skimming. were you skimming? having trouble recalling just who all it was.DoomYoshi wrote:Until someone admits to not picking up on the soft claim that isn't a valid fos.SPARTACUS1974 wrote: For doom he tried his best to make sure that every1 new that jak was the doc and that again does seem scummy to me fos doom

I have no idea what all this is about. I don't think anything Doom did was particularly noteworthy.jgordon1111 wrote:LOL funny one doom,thats like when I asked the skimmers to just admit that they were skimming. were you skimming? having trouble recalling just who all it was.DoomYoshi wrote:Until someone admits to not picking up on the soft claim that isn't a valid fos.SPARTACUS1974 wrote: For doom he tried his best to make sure that every1 new that jak was the doc and that again does seem scummy to me fos doom
On the opposite side of that,until you can get everyone to admit they got the soft claim it is a valid FOS from spartacus.
Good use of the FOS there spartacus, a good reference point to come back to.

everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
Whoa, FOS on Clever here. That's major skimming bud. You and Doom seem to enjoy messing up mine and jg's names.Some7hingCLEVER wrote:this post busts my gut cause he has been told plenty of times what the point of that was so in this post he pretty much digs himself a hole. he did it to see who was skimming i had one read through and i knew that. then you dis him on his english and i can read it fine maybe im on the same level of idiocy he is. except that i wouldnt soft claim doctor at all. so i guess im higher on the inteligence totem pole then he is. anyway i can understand everything. and yes he did catch someone skimming ...YOU you skimmed for pages not knowing what he said when even other people are trying to explain it to you. so for that vote doomDoomYoshi wrote:Ok, jgordon. In clear English can you explain how you caught me skimming? You requested a modkill because I edited my own post. Now you are accusing me of skimming the fact that I edited my posts?
I will be honest jgordon. 90% I read but I am forced to ignore because your grasp of English is incomprehensible. I try to find the meaning in what you say, but you talk so much and so poorly that it usually ends up being more effort than it is worth. Right now I still can't understand what you are saying. You didn't catch anyone skimming, from what I saw, most players (including the mod) went back and checked whether or not I edited a post.
jgordon- i have no clue why you soft claimed doc and its confusing. i dont see your reasoning behind it at all. if you even gave one. you outed one of towns power roles right of the bat and its not gonna help us at all.
jak111-if doom comes up to not be a good candidate to lynch ill vote you because you said that you didnt care if you got killed.
Yeah actually I did catch that. But that's not the main reason my vote's on JG. It's mostly because of his contradictory behaviourjak111 wrote:Fastposted by SG7, Well you sorta just skimmed the last few posts bud, Doom finally admitted that he skimmed the post that said it was to catch skimmers after making a big deal about the mess (So pretty much everyone who made a big deal about it skimmed the part where he said it was to catch skimmers).
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.

fos me if you want i had to read 14 pages sorry if i messed up your name..the fact is what i said is what i thnk and i fixed it end of story. and the whole thing about trying to catch skimmers from that edit post of doom thing was a waste the only thing you would catch is bandwagons if anything;jak111 wrote:Whoa, FOS on Clever here. That's major skimming bud. You and Doom seem to enjoy messing up mine and jg's names.Some7hingCLEVER wrote:this post busts my gut cause he has been told plenty of times what the point of that was so in this post he pretty much digs himself a hole. he did it to see who was skimming i had one read through and i knew that. then you dis him on his english and i can read it fine maybe im on the same level of idiocy he is. except that i wouldnt soft claim doctor at all. so i guess im higher on the inteligence totem pole then he is. anyway i can understand everything. and yes he did catch someone skimming ...YOU you skimmed for pages not knowing what he said when even other people are trying to explain it to you. so for that vote doomDoomYoshi wrote:Ok, jgordon. In clear English can you explain how you caught me skimming? You requested a modkill because I edited my own post. Now you are accusing me of skimming the fact that I edited my posts?
I will be honest jgordon. 90% I read but I am forced to ignore because your grasp of English is incomprehensible. I try to find the meaning in what you say, but you talk so much and so poorly that it usually ends up being more effort than it is worth. Right now I still can't understand what you are saying. You didn't catch anyone skimming, from what I saw, most players (including the mod) went back and checked whether or not I edited a post.
jgordon- i have no clue why you soft claimed doc and its confusing. i dont see your reasoning behind it at all. if you even gave one. you outed one of towns power roles right of the bat and its not gonna help us at all.
jak111-if doom comes up to not be a good candidate to lynch ill vote you because you said that you didnt care if you got killed.
However, my vote remains on Doom. Yes the submariners are bad, you can even get more info and call them out on it D2 and D3 if must be. I'd think Adolf would be a GF, so if it was to be given to a person like Doom, I'm sure he'd be pretty active to stay in the game. Right now out of 18 players, the Adolf is the only one I need to gun for to use my power for the town's sake.
Anyone else think it's at least worth a claim from him?
Fastposted by SG7, Well you sorta just skimmed the last few posts bud, Doom finally admitted that he skimmed the post that said it was to catch skimmers after making a big deal about the mess (So pretty much everyone who made a big deal about it skimmed the part where he said it was to catch skimmers).
Stop skimming dazza. We are trying to play the game.dazza2008 wrote:I think "smimming" is being used far to bloody much here. Clever mixing up two players names is not skimming. It is a mistake is it not?
If he had been skimming he would not know what the claims had been let alone who said them.
Nearly every post you guys put up here is accusing someone of skimming
Sorry.DoomYoshi wrote:Stop skimming dazza. We are trying to play the game.dazza2008 wrote:I think "smimming" is being used far to bloody much here. Clever mixing up two players names is not skimming. It is a mistake is it not?
If he had been skimming he would not know what the claims had been let alone who said them.
Nearly every post you guys put up here is accusing someone of skimming

Defense, what defense I dont need no stinking defense. I know the odds of a survivor making it to the end,and I am trying to give you a shot at catching scum with their hand in the damn cookie jar.shieldgenerator7 wrote:Ok, I didn't get online much yesterday and had a lot of pages to read up on in multiple games, and this one had most posts, so it got shoved on the back burner. But now I've caught up from page 14 and have noted what I thought was important thus far:
NOTESSo far, I find Doom suspicious for outing jak's softclaim and BWing on JG after his claim on grounds that, crash, I forget. Will go back and check maybe, but it was really shaky grounds or something. FOS DOOMSpoiler
jak-
tries to direct doc, talks about protecting his buddy (16) chapcrap sums this up (17) pmc says he's town (18) defends himself and votes jg (18) claims Rosana Masse Town Doc (22)
shield-
ragian asks about S7C connections (17) saf calls him out (24) posts (25)
leehar-
says Shield's not in this game (18)
jgordon-
pmc votes him, w/ex (18) claims Curt Lowens survivor Poland (18) chap says lynching survivor is good (18) NG1 townies him (19) BWs on Doom (21) tells everyone to "go play real mafia" (22) Rodion points out inconsistency in jg's posts (23)
pmc-
suggests vig kills jg (20) tells jak to nameclaim (21)
doom-
BWs on jg(<21) outs jak's softclaim (<21)
ghostly-
clarifies roles (23)
ragian-
posts list of inactive players (24)
I also find it suspect that PMC wants JG vigged. His reasoning: 3 mafia, 1 survivor, 3 town = Mafia win; whereas 3 mafia, 4 town = Town still has a chance. This reasoning is faulty. For one, having equal town + 1 survivor is not a mafia win per se. There's a chance that town could still win. In the end, it's up to the mod what happens at this point, I guess. And vigging the survivor?! If we vigged the survivor that would decrease "potential town" numbers and give mafia easier win. If we don't vig the survivor, then the "3 mafia, 4 town" becomes "3 mafia, 4 town, 1 survivor" which has potential to be a better situation for town. Also, it's not really up to us who that 7th player in endgame is. It's more up to the mafia and who they kill, altho town does have some power w/ lynches (but not as much since lynches are more "blind"). I can't see why PMC didn't see this and think he was being intentionally misleading. I was only going to small fos him but I've convinced myself otherwise. FOS PMC
Now that takes me to the survivor. While catching up, I initially had eyes on jak, but he's townie (as far as we know), then I thought about Doom and JG, but JG really got my attention because he told us to "go play real mafia", which rather angered me. Now, I like constructive criticism but this seemed to be more of an insult. He later tried to prove his point with his "Doom you edited your post", but it seems it didn't catch too many skimmers (or maybe I skimmed thatjg, who did you catch skimming with that maneuver?). And then Rodion points out inconsistencies in his posts about what he claims to be and what he tries to make his motives appear to be. He tries to look town by saying he will sacrifice himself for a doc, but claims survivor, and it clearly wouldn't be beneficial for him to sacrifice himself for the doc as a survivor. So due to this inconsistency in his posts, I think we may have found a fakeclaiming nazi. VOTE JGORDON
Also, about the SG7/S7C thing. S7C is my padowan and his SK claim mirrors my own constant mafia claiming.
Thanks for calling me out saf, 2 pages before I can respond. I honestly didn't even read your post until I was catching up, but I do feel loved for being called out for inactivityThanks, saf.
I think that's all I needed to respond to at this point.
FASTPOSTED
yeah, yet another point against JG. I look forward to hearing your defense
-SG7 ()

Shield, your reasoning for pmc and jg are contradictory.shieldgenerator7 wrote:Ok, I didn't get online much yesterday and had a lot of pages to read up on in multiple games, and this one had most posts, so it got shoved on the back burner. But now I've caught up from page 14 and have noted what I thought was important thus far:
NOTESSo far, I find Doom suspicious for outing jak's softclaim and BWing on JG after his claim on grounds that, crash, I forget. Will go back and check maybe, but it was really shaky grounds or something. FOS DOOMSpoiler
jak-
tries to direct doc, talks about protecting his buddy (16) chapcrap sums this up (17) pmc says he's town (18) defends himself and votes jg (18) claims Rosana Masse Town Doc (22)
shield-
ragian asks about S7C connections (17) saf calls him out (24) posts (25)
leehar-
says Shield's not in this game (18)
jgordon-
pmc votes him, w/ex (18) claims Curt Lowens survivor Poland (18) chap says lynching survivor is good (18) NG1 townies him (19) BWs on Doom (21) tells everyone to "go play real mafia" (22) Rodion points out inconsistency in jg's posts (23)
pmc-
suggests vig kills jg (20) tells jak to nameclaim (21)
doom-
BWs on jg(<21) outs jak's softclaim (<21)
ghostly-
clarifies roles (23)
ragian-
posts list of inactive players (24)
I also find it suspect that PMC wants JG vigged. His reasoning: 3 mafia, 1 survivor, 3 town = Mafia win; whereas 3 mafia, 4 town = Town still has a chance. This reasoning is faulty. For one, having equal town + 1 survivor is not a mafia win per se. There's a chance that town could still win. In the end, it's up to the mod what happens at this point, I guess. And vigging the survivor?! If we vigged the survivor that would decrease "potential town" numbers and give mafia easier win. If we don't vig the survivor, then the "3 mafia, 4 town" becomes "3 mafia, 4 town, 1 survivor" which has potential to be a better situation for town. Also, it's not really up to us who that 7th player in endgame is. It's more up to the mafia and who they kill, altho town does have some power w/ lynches (but not as much since lynches are more "blind"). I can't see why PMC didn't see this and think he was being intentionally misleading. I was only going to small fos him but I've convinced myself otherwise. FOS PMC
Now that takes me to the survivor. While catching up, I initially had eyes on jak, but he's townie (as far as we know), then I thought about Doom and JG, but JG really got my attention because he told us to "go play real mafia", which rather angered me. Now, I like constructive criticism but this seemed to be more of an insult. He later tried to prove his point with his "Doom you edited your post", but it seems it didn't catch too many skimmers (or maybe I skimmed thatjg, who did you catch skimming with that maneuver?). And then Rodion points out inconsistencies in his posts about what he claims to be and what he tries to make his motives appear to be. He tries to look town by saying he will sacrifice himself for a doc, but claims survivor, and it clearly wouldn't be beneficial for him to sacrifice himself for the doc as a survivor. So due to this inconsistency in his posts, I think we may have found a fakeclaiming nazi. VOTE JGORDON
Also, about the SG7/S7C thing. S7C is my padowan and his SK claim mirrors my own constant mafia claiming.
Thanks for calling me out saf, 2 pages before I can respond. I honestly didn't even read your post until I was catching up, but I do feel loved for being called out for inactivityThanks, saf.
I think that's all I needed to respond to at this point.
FASTPOSTED
yeah, yet another point against JG. I look forward to hearing your defense
-SG7 ()

Two things here. First of all, what else do we have to judge guilt? Facial expressions? Cases are built on post analysis, I don't see how else we expect to get mafia besides praying that the cop gets a lucky investigation and is not killed.jgordon1111 wrote:Defense, what defense I dont need no stinking defense. I know the odds of a survivor making it to the end,and I am trying to give you a shot at catching scum with their hand in the damn cookie jar.shieldgenerator7 wrote:Ok, I didn't get online much yesterday and had a lot of pages to read up on in multiple games, and this one had most posts, so it got shoved on the back burner. But now I've caught up from page 14 and have noted what I thought was important thus far:
NOTESSo far, I find Doom suspicious for outing jak's softclaim and BWing on JG after his claim on grounds that, crash, I forget. Will go back and check maybe, but it was really shaky grounds or something. FOS DOOMSpoiler
jak-
tries to direct doc, talks about protecting his buddy (16) chapcrap sums this up (17) pmc says he's town (18) defends himself and votes jg (18) claims Rosana Masse Town Doc (22)
shield-
ragian asks about S7C connections (17) saf calls him out (24) posts (25)
leehar-
says Shield's not in this game (18)
jgordon-
pmc votes him, w/ex (18) claims Curt Lowens survivor Poland (18) chap says lynching survivor is good (18) NG1 townies him (19) BWs on Doom (21) tells everyone to "go play real mafia" (22) Rodion points out inconsistency in jg's posts (23)
pmc-
suggests vig kills jg (20) tells jak to nameclaim (21)
doom-
BWs on jg(<21) outs jak's softclaim (<21)
ghostly-
clarifies roles (23)
ragian-
posts list of inactive players (24)
I also find it suspect that PMC wants JG vigged. His reasoning: 3 mafia, 1 survivor, 3 town = Mafia win; whereas 3 mafia, 4 town = Town still has a chance. This reasoning is faulty. For one, having equal town + 1 survivor is not a mafia win per se. There's a chance that town could still win. In the end, it's up to the mod what happens at this point, I guess. And vigging the survivor?! If we vigged the survivor that would decrease "potential town" numbers and give mafia easier win. If we don't vig the survivor, then the "3 mafia, 4 town" becomes "3 mafia, 4 town, 1 survivor" which has potential to be a better situation for town. Also, it's not really up to us who that 7th player in endgame is. It's more up to the mafia and who they kill, altho town does have some power w/ lynches (but not as much since lynches are more "blind"). I can't see why PMC didn't see this and think he was being intentionally misleading. I was only going to small fos him but I've convinced myself otherwise. FOS PMC
Now that takes me to the survivor. While catching up, I initially had eyes on jak, but he's townie (as far as we know), then I thought about Doom and JG, but JG really got my attention because he told us to "go play real mafia", which rather angered me. Now, I like constructive criticism but this seemed to be more of an insult. He later tried to prove his point with his "Doom you edited your post", but it seems it didn't catch too many skimmers (or maybe I skimmed thatjg, who did you catch skimming with that maneuver?). And then Rodion points out inconsistencies in his posts about what he claims to be and what he tries to make his motives appear to be. He tries to look town by saying he will sacrifice himself for a doc, but claims survivor, and it clearly wouldn't be beneficial for him to sacrifice himself for the doc as a survivor. So due to this inconsistency in his posts, I think we may have found a fakeclaiming nazi. VOTE JGORDON
Also, about the SG7/S7C thing. S7C is my padowan and his SK claim mirrors my own constant mafia claiming.
Thanks for calling me out saf, 2 pages before I can respond. I honestly didn't even read your post until I was catching up, but I do feel loved for being called out for inactivityThanks, saf.
I think that's all I needed to respond to at this point.
FASTPOSTED
yeah, yet another point against JG. I look forward to hearing your defense
-SG7 ()
God quit trying to analyze what I am saying and what my motives are.
All of you read into what people say way to much,and think you have scum when usually what you end up with is dead town.LOL
I have already explained myself in this game,and almost every game I have ever been in. ARGHHHH just read what I say literally,not what you think I might mean, Amused each time this happens. Used to get pissed now just amused alot.
Fastposted and fastposted Etcetera etcetera etcetera.

We have our community and we like it, if you don't then stop playing. Fair enough some people do skim too much but stop looking down your nose at people, especially when you claimed survivor day 1.jgordon1111 wrote:more skimming from all of you.
The thing I am trying to get all of you to quit doing.
Go back doom and the rest of you where I asked for you to get mod killed and read my follow up posts please.
Man you guys never learn,for some of the supposed best mafia players on CC you really dont follow anything well at all. In the real mafia games most of you would get waxed D1 for the BS you do here.
But it still humors me to watch the followers and the leaders.
The leaders are usually so sure of themselves, they overlook the obvious and go for targets that usually hurt them when the lynching begins and the followers rather than do any actual research or work on their own vote with the leaders(because of their "LOL" experience) at mafia games.
I do find it rather easy to run circles around most of you so called leaders in most games,just by my play style which you apparently cannot follow.
here is a suggestion go play the real mafia games a couple of times just to understand what I mean lol. You might then understand why I FOS instead of voting most of the time. It is sometimes a better tool than an actual vote. But enough for now, please continue.
Oh one last hint look around and see who hasnt really posted since,the ball is now bouncing in different court.
Great advice for playing mafia.jgordon1111 wrote:God quit trying to analyze what I am saying and what my motives are.
A lot of mods would end game in that scenario and if not then all that was required was mafia to ask jg to vote with them for a guaranteed win. Survivors are not townies.shield wrote:I also find it suspect that PMC wants JG vigged. His reasoning: 3 mafia, 1 survivor, 3 town = Mafia win; whereas 3 mafia, 4 town = Town still has a chance. This reasoning is faulty. For one, having equal town + 1 survivor is not a mafia win per se. There's a chance that town could still win. In the end, it's up to the mod what happens at this point, I guess. And vigging the survivor?! If we vigged the survivor that would decrease "potential town" numbers and give mafia easier win. If we don't vig the survivor, then the "3 mafia, 4 town" becomes "3 mafia, 4 town, 1 survivor" which has potential to be a better situation for town. Also, it's not really up to us who that 7th player in endgame is. It's more up to the mafia and who they kill, altho town does have some power w/ lynches (but not as much since lynches are more "blind"). I can't see why PMC didn't see this and think he was being intentionally misleading. I was only going to small fos him but I've convinced myself otherwise. FOS PMC
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
Exactly Saf, some nut suggested vigging me, NO Bad Damn idea lynch me and watch those that have voted already for dumbass reasons or the hammer dropper I suggest when it comes time you look closely at chuck again LOLsafariguy5 wrote:Two things here. First of all, what else do we have to judge guilt? Facial expressions? Cases are built on post analysis, I don't see how else we expect to get mafia besides praying that the cop gets a lucky investigation and is not killed.jgordon1111 wrote:Defense, what defense I dont need no stinking defense. I know the odds of a survivor making it to the end,and I am trying to give you a shot at catching scum with their hand in the damn cookie jar.shieldgenerator7 wrote:Ok, I didn't get online much yesterday and had a lot of pages to read up on in multiple games, and this one had most posts, so it got shoved on the back burner. But now I've caught up from page 14 and have noted what I thought was important thus far:
NOTESSo far, I find Doom suspicious for outing jak's softclaim and BWing on JG after his claim on grounds that, crash, I forget. Will go back and check maybe, but it was really shaky grounds or something. FOS DOOMSpoiler
jak-
tries to direct doc, talks about protecting his buddy (16) chapcrap sums this up (17) pmc says he's town (18) defends himself and votes jg (18) claims Rosana Masse Town Doc (22)
shield-
ragian asks about S7C connections (17) saf calls him out (24) posts (25)
leehar-
says Shield's not in this game (18)
jgordon-
pmc votes him, w/ex (18) claims Curt Lowens survivor Poland (18) chap says lynching survivor is good (18) NG1 townies him (19) BWs on Doom (21) tells everyone to "go play real mafia" (22) Rodion points out inconsistency in jg's posts (23)
pmc-
suggests vig kills jg (20) tells jak to nameclaim (21)
doom-
BWs on jg(<21) outs jak's softclaim (<21)
ghostly-
clarifies roles (23)
ragian-
posts list of inactive players (24)
I also find it suspect that PMC wants JG vigged. His reasoning: 3 mafia, 1 survivor, 3 town = Mafia win; whereas 3 mafia, 4 town = Town still has a chance. This reasoning is faulty. For one, having equal town + 1 survivor is not a mafia win per se. There's a chance that town could still win. In the end, it's up to the mod what happens at this point, I guess. And vigging the survivor?! If we vigged the survivor that would decrease "potential town" numbers and give mafia easier win. If we don't vig the survivor, then the "3 mafia, 4 town" becomes "3 mafia, 4 town, 1 survivor" which has potential to be a better situation for town. Also, it's not really up to us who that 7th player in endgame is. It's more up to the mafia and who they kill, altho town does have some power w/ lynches (but not as much since lynches are more "blind"). I can't see why PMC didn't see this and think he was being intentionally misleading. I was only going to small fos him but I've convinced myself otherwise. FOS PMC
Now that takes me to the survivor. While catching up, I initially had eyes on jak, but he's townie (as far as we know), then I thought about Doom and JG, but JG really got my attention because he told us to "go play real mafia", which rather angered me. Now, I like constructive criticism but this seemed to be more of an insult. He later tried to prove his point with his "Doom you edited your post", but it seems it didn't catch too many skimmers (or maybe I skimmed thatjg, who did you catch skimming with that maneuver?). And then Rodion points out inconsistencies in his posts about what he claims to be and what he tries to make his motives appear to be. He tries to look town by saying he will sacrifice himself for a doc, but claims survivor, and it clearly wouldn't be beneficial for him to sacrifice himself for the doc as a survivor. So due to this inconsistency in his posts, I think we may have found a fakeclaiming nazi. VOTE JGORDON
Also, about the SG7/S7C thing. S7C is my padowan and his SK claim mirrors my own constant mafia claiming.
Thanks for calling me out saf, 2 pages before I can respond. I honestly didn't even read your post until I was catching up, but I do feel loved for being called out for inactivityThanks, saf.
I think that's all I needed to respond to at this point.
FASTPOSTED
yeah, yet another point against JG. I look forward to hearing your defense
-SG7 ()
God quit trying to analyze what I am saying and what my motives are.
All of you read into what people say way to much,and think you have scum when usually what you end up with is dead town.LOL
I have already explained myself in this game,and almost every game I have ever been in. ARGHHHH just read what I say literally,not what you think I might mean, Amused each time this happens. Used to get pissed now just amused alot.
Fastposted and fastposted Etcetera etcetera etcetera.
Second of all, since you're neither town nor scum (allegedly) a lynch of you would not result in dead town.


True, vigging could be a "wasted action" but remember that town vigs are supposed to be pretty cautious with their kills anyways. I've always been a big proponent of not vigging Night 1 unless we have a clear target (i.e. two people claim the same thing, we lynched the wrong one). So really, considering where we are at this time in the game, I wouldn't say it's a wasted action by the vig as a smart vig won't go randomly shooting on Night 1 anyways.shieldgenerator7 wrote:No saf I believe you misunderstand my post.
My reason for FOSing PMC is for the concept of NKing a survivor. I understand the difference between the two situations he described, but the way he presented it made is sound as tho vigging the survivor would change the "3 mafia, 1 survivor, 3 town" into: "3 mafia, 4 town", when in reality it changes it into "3 mafia, 3 town", which is obv a scum win. My FOS on PMC is for srsly suggesting vigging the survivor and the logic he used. (and now that I think of it for also trying to direct the vig, however scummy that is)
I'm voting JG on the other hand because of the inconsistency between his WC and the actions the proposals he's made. I guess that means he's willing to side with town, but like Rodion said that could be an easy fakeclaim. I guess if JG sides with town he's alright, but he could turn at any moment. SO i'm still keeping my eye on him.
So what's the diff between vigging and lynching the survivor? Lynching is more calculated and town usually gains more info, whereas if we vigged him it would waste a town power role's night action and it's the decision of jsut one person. Alright, I was just making this up. What I really think:
Vigging him would be killing him just to kill him b/c he's a survivor. Lynching would be more of getting info from his BW and killing him b/c his claim and actions don't line up.
FASTPOSTED
-SG7 ()

Between RL and the matrix mafia game (I am admittedly a bit overwhelmed between the two games) I am having trouble keeping up. I have been reading posts from my phone (which is why you see me online) but I need time to reread, get caught up on what I have missed and process all the information. I hope to do so soon.jgordon1111 wrote:you were on yesterday chuck and this morning yet no response and nothing to say here after warning me not to BW you,for an FOS. LOL
Come on chuck talk to me or any of us.

I had an inkling the same way. What survivor would tell people to lynch himself?DoomYoshi wrote:This would be amazing jester play. I don't trust it though.
And you keep trying to put down what I say is of no import doom, There is a reason I FOS'ed You as well.DoomYoshi wrote:This would be amazing jester play. I don't trust it though.

