Moderator: Cartographers

thenobodies80 wrote:A small note if you're going to replace some names.
Remember to keep the territory list consistent with the current version, I mean everything has to be in the same order so if Wicked is the 10th territory in the list in the old xml and you will rename it "Joe",then Joe has to be the 10th territory also in the new version.

DoomYoshi wrote:I would agree with an update in the names. However, I like the doghouse bonus. Please keep it as is.



names for suggestiongreenoaks wrote:could the 4 names at the bottom be updated to reflect our house now ?

Agreed.Ickyketseddie wrote:Be nice to see this revamped. I love the gameplay just how it is though i wouldn't change a thing. Doghouse imo works fine the way it is.
Could run some sort of comp/tourney for the neighbours names?

I talked to Kabanellas not too long ago, and he said at the moment Clandemonium won't be updated (I even offered to change the XML!)chapcrap wrote:I agree with greenoaks about the names. It would be a fun update to the maps like this and Clandemonium, to have updated territory names with the changing CC community.

i am quite willing to update the names, that's why i ask for suggestions folks.cairnswk wrote:names for suggestiongreenoaks wrote:could the 4 names at the bottom be updated to reflect our house now ?

Two of those people don't have avatars to use!isaiah40 wrote:Probably won't fit but bigWham for Lack or just Wham, BMO for Andy, Nobodies for DIM, Blake for wicked.

Can we create the avatars? Suggestions?Gilligan wrote:Two of those people don't have avatars to use!isaiah40 wrote:Probably won't fit but bigWham for Lack or just Wham, BMO for Andy, Nobodies for DIM, Blake for wicked.

I feel like the avatars on the map should be somewhat nostalgic to the person that it is portraying (ie, lack ALWAYS used the turtle, andy ALWAYS used Curious George)cairnswk wrote:Can we create the avatars? Suggestions?Gilligan wrote:Two of those people don't have avatars to use!isaiah40 wrote:Probably won't fit but bigWham for Lack or just Wham, BMO for Andy, Nobodies for DIM, Blake for wicked.

What about asking the people concerned what they would like to have themsleves represented by?Gilligan wrote:I feel like the avatars on the map should be somewhat nostalgic to the person that it is portraying (ie, lack ALWAYS used the turtle, andy ALWAYS used Curious George)cairnswk wrote:Can we create the avatars? Suggestions?Gilligan wrote:Two of those people don't have avatars to use!isaiah40 wrote:Probably won't fit but bigWham for Lack or just Wham, BMO for Andy, Nobodies for DIM, Blake for wicked.
Just slapping a picture to represent a person I think is a bit silly because no one will understand the references.

If it's used as their avatar, sure. Personally, that's what made Lack, Andy, Wicked and DiM really pop on that map because it's also what I saw in the forums whenever they posted.cairnswk wrote:What about asking the people concerned what they would like to have themsleves represented by?Gilligan wrote:I feel like the avatars on the map should be somewhat nostalgic to the person that it is portraying (ie, lack ALWAYS used the turtle, andy ALWAYS used Curious George)cairnswk wrote:Can we create the avatars? Suggestions?Gilligan wrote:Two of those people don't have avatars to use!isaiah40 wrote:Probably won't fit but bigWham for Lack or just Wham, BMO for Andy, Nobodies for DIM, Blake for wicked.
Just slapping a picture to represent a person I think is a bit silly because no one will understand the references.



That would be totally up to you. It would have to go through the graphics stage again. If you do this, start a new thread and we can get it bumped up to the Main Foundry so you can get the graphic revamp done. Then once everything is good to go and it passes, then we'll merged the two threads.cairnswk wrote:i'd started a revamp of the graphics some time ago...
so if we go down this road, i think it would be an idea to revamp this also.
