strike wolf wrote:So I've watched a few 60s movies recently...I've noticed a trend and I'm wondering why some of them seem to start like they are already 5-10 minutes into the film? Like during editing the director's going "No no no this movies 2 hours. It needs to be 1 hour 50 at the most." and everyone replied "no problem. We'lll just edit out the first 10 minutes. No one wants to see how the couple met anyways. They just want to get to the good stuff where their lives are spiraling out of control from drugs."
What films have you watched from the 60's?
**Munches on a banana**
--Andy
Rosemary's Baby, Panic in Needle Park, Bullitt, The Great Escape, The Graduate, Dr. Strangelove. I know there's a couple others but I can't think of them right now.
The number one complaint I hear about movies from the 60s is that they are too slow. So, I can assure you that you are in the minority with feeling that there is stuff missing.
However, with the graduate in particular, the idea is that you don't figure out who all the characters are right away, but that you will figure it out through the dialogue. Today's movies spoonfeed relationships. Sample dialogue (from transformers): "this is my mom". That sort of spoonfeeding really has destroyed your brain if you are unable to figure how the characters relate to each other in the graduate. I am assuming you did figure it out, it just took you longer. That is a more naturalistic, less stylized approach to screenplay writing.
So, I forgot that yesterday Casablanca was going to be shown in theaters across the USA, as part a 70th anniversary sponsored by Turner Classic Movies channel. I wanted to go see the film on the big screen, but by the time I remembered, the last showing was underway.
strike wolf wrote:So I've watched a few 60s movies recently...I've noticed a trend and I'm wondering why some of them seem to start like they are already 5-10 minutes into the film? Like during editing the director's going "No no no this movies 2 hours. It needs to be 1 hour 50 at the most." and everyone replied "no problem. We'lll just edit out the first 10 minutes. No one wants to see how the couple met anyways. They just want to get to the good stuff where their lives are spiraling out of control from drugs."
What films have you watched from the 60's?
**Munches on a banana**
--Andy
Rosemary's Baby, Panic in Needle Park, Bullitt, The Great Escape, The Graduate, Dr. Strangelove. I know there's a couple others but I can't think of them right now.
The number one complaint I hear about movies from the 60s is that they are too slow. So, I can assure you that you are in the minority with feeling that there is stuff missing.
However, with the graduate in particular, the idea is that you don't figure out who all the characters are right away, but that you will figure it out through the dialogue. Today's movies spoonfeed relationships. Sample dialogue (from transformers): "this is my mom". That sort of spoonfeeding really has destroyed your brain if you are unable to figure how the characters relate to each other in the graduate. I am assuming you did figure it out, it just took you longer. That is a more naturalistic, less stylized approach to screenplay writing.
I like character development so slow wasn't too much of an issue as long as the movie was well done. As far as spoon feeding information. I'm ok with being spoonfed the general stuff as long as we are given quality characters where I can delve into their actual personalities. Transformers is not a good example of that. I just felt like some of scenes that could have been dramatic were skipped over (especially towards beginning of movies) or shortened badly. Like in one movie it was the girl's first time using drugs and I felt there should have been at least I felt a scene a couple moments of hesitation to show that the character was nervous and that she was really thinking about it. instead the scene was really quick.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
AndyDufresne wrote:So, I forgot that yesterday Casablanca was going to be shown in theaters across the USA, as part a 70th anniversary sponsored by Turner Classic Movies channel. I wanted to go see the film on the big screen, but by the time I remembered, the last showing was underway.
**Leaves behind a bowl of despondent bananas**
--Andy
Anytime I think about watching Casablanca, I say to myself "Eh, I've seen this over 9000 times."
AndyDufresne wrote:So, I forgot that yesterday Casablanca was going to be shown in theaters across the USA, as part a 70th anniversary sponsored by Turner Classic Movies channel. I wanted to go see the film on the big screen, but by the time I remembered, the last showing was underway.
**Leaves behind a bowl of despondent bananas**
--Andy
You could rent a school room with a large screen and do a private showing. As part of the CC WW2 maps action plan meeting that you are about to host at the school (nudge, nudge, wink, wink).
AndyDufresne wrote:I'll just watch it this weekend by myself. I'll probably have an old film-a-thon...perhaps I'll watch The Seven Samurai and Bicycle Thieves as well.
Mmmh! I recently saw a Criterion Collection of Kurosawa's work...and was tempted to get it, but it was pretty expensive. But if you really broke down the price to individual dvds...it does save you money buying the big pack...
I always get worried when a movie is hyped. Hunger games was worth the hype. The first 30 mins or so were blah, but the last 2 hours made up for it. You should definitely see this if you are on the fence.
DoomYoshi wrote:I always get worried when a movie is hyped. Hunger games was worth the hype. The first 30 mins or so were blah, but the last 2 hours made up for it. You should definitely see this if you are on the fence.
Definitely not on the fence. Wanted to see it this weekend but it's already been sold out.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.