Knights

by **thehippo8** on Sat Jan 21, 2012 3:40 pm

No comments other than to say ... hooray!

by **bryguy** on Sat Jan 21, 2012 3:56 pm

I only have a small thing that has been bugging me: The texture for the bonus shields looks a bit strong and bugs my eyes after a few moments. Would they look better with the texture lessened a bit in opacity? It isn't really a problem for the green shields, but for the yellow and purple it is. If I'm the only person that is bugged by this though then it probably doesn't need to be changed.

by **koontz1973** on Sat Jan 21, 2012 4:24 pm

bryguy, will have a look a toning it down for you. That is not a problem. Thanks for looking in.

by **koontz1973** on Sat Jan 21, 2012 4:36 pm

Here you go. Toned down texture on shields.

Click image to enlarge.

by **bryguy** on Sat Jan 21, 2012 4:51 pm

Looks great

by **koontz1973** on Wed Jan 25, 2012 12:33 pm

Any more concerns or can I get a stamp?

by **gimil** on Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:11 pm

You may...

Welcome to the forge... remember this is no a seal of final approval. If further concerns arise you will have to address them

by **bryguy** on Thu Jan 26, 2012 5:55 pm

Glad to see this in the forge =D>

Just a small nitpick: I notice the grass can be seen behind the "board" showing how you can move (Between the cracks to be precise) Would it look better if there were black between the seems, as with the main board?

by **Victor Sullivan** on Thu Jan 26, 2012 6:55 pm

Aloha! Er, avast! Or something...

I still say I'm less than impressed with the title, though that's merely the entirety of a minority, it seems. At any rate, not all of your shields on the large version are centered on the horizontal axis (I realize why they aren't on the vertical), particularly the yellow ones.

I'm most interested to see what nobodies has to say. I'm rather surprised gimil didn't have anything more to say.

-Sully

by **koontz1973** on Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:08 am

Victor Sullivan wrote:Aloha! Er, avast! Or something...

I still say I'm less than impressed with the title, though that's merely the entirety of a minority, it seems. At any rate, not all of your shields on the large version are centered on the horizontal axis (I realize why they aren't on the vertical), particularly the yellow ones.

I'm most interested to see what nobodies has to say. I'm rather surprised gimil didn't have anything more to say.

-Sully

Sully, with the shields, on both large and small, I centred the numbers, (if you look in the first post, you can see the spoiler with the numbers in). I then adjusted the shields to fit around the numbers. It is more noticeable in the small version with the shield on the left of the territ but this again is in case of the 888s. The 88s on the large are centred but the 88s on the small are 2 or 3 pixels to the left to the 888s fit into the territ completely.

by **koontz1973** on Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:08 am

bryguy, will fix.

by **koontz1973** on Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:09 am

gimil wrote:You may...

Welcome to the forge... remember this is no a seal of final approval. If further concerns arise you will have to address them

Thanks gimil.

by **natty dread** on Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:15 am

koontz1973 wrote:The 88s on the large are centred but the 88s on the small are 2 or 3 pixels to the left to the 888s fit into the territ completely.

You could rather just center the 88:s on both versions - it doesn't matter if the 888:s go over the squares on the small, as long as they don't overlap each other.

by **koontz1973** on Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:30 am

natty_dread wrote:
koontz1973 wrote:The 88s on the large are centred but the 88s on the small are 2 or 3 pixels to the left to the 888s fit into the territ completely.

You could rather just center the 88:s on both versions - it doesn't matter if the 888:s go over the squares on the small, as long as they don't overlap each other.

These are pretty damn centred.

Click image to enlarge.

New images with the black in the mini board.

by **koontz1973** on Fri Jan 27, 2012 2:25 am

xml file.
http://www.fileden.com/files/2012/1/27/ ... nights.xml

by **natty dread** on Fri Jan 27, 2012 7:57 am

Koontz, can you please post a version with neutral amounts and starting troop amounts for the xml check. Thanks.

by **koontz1973** on Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:41 pm

natty_dread wrote:Koontz, can you please post a version with neutral amounts and starting troop amounts for the xml check. Thanks.

Here you are natty. Both sets of positions and in larger games, the 4 rows should start with 3 troops on each number. A normal 3 neutral will pop up if not used. All centre rows will start with a 1 neutral.
Here is a new xml as I had forgotten to add the reinforcement part of the code so everyone gets 5 troops only per round.
http://www.fileden.com/files/2012/1/27/ ... echess.xml

by **koontz1973** on Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:27 am

xml
http://www.fileden.com/files/2012/1/27/3255536//Newknights.xml
large

Click image to enlarge.

small

by **natty dread** on Fri Feb 03, 2012 2:08 am

Here you go, por favor!

by **koontz1973** on Fri Feb 03, 2012 2:26 am

natty_dread wrote:Here you go, por favor!

Oh! great wise one. Thank you.
Me

by **koontz1973** on Fri Feb 03, 2012 2:28 am

Can I have a gold dot?

Please.

by **Gillipig** on Fri Feb 03, 2012 3:49 pm

Sorry to say this but I think this might be the most luck dependent map I've ever seen! If you get to start and roll good you'll win. Not much strategy to this map! I'll still play it though

!

by **koontz1973** on Sat Feb 04, 2012 8:24 am

Gillipig wrote:Sorry to say this but I think this might be the most luck dependent map I've ever seen! If you get to start and roll good you'll win. Not much strategy to this map! I'll still play it though !

Sigh up to this and we will see how lucky you are.

viewtopic.php?f=90&t=163873

by **koontz1973** on Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:42 pm

thenobodies80 wrote:About knights, please post in the knights topic

Nobodies

Please, pretty please.

Current images and xml.

Click image to enlarge.

http://www.fileden.com/files/2012/1/27/3255536//Newknights.xml

by **thehippo8** on Thu Feb 23, 2012 12:52 am

I see a dot!

Knights

Re: Knights [21/01] Page 1 & 19 Graphics finished?

Re: Knights [21/01] Page 1 & 19 Graphics finished?

Re: Knights [21/01] Page 1 & 19 Graphics finished?

Re: Knights [21/01] Page 1 & 19 Graphics finished?

Re: Knights [21/01] Page 1 & 19 Graphics finished?

Re: Knights [21/01] Page 1 & 19

Re: Knights [21/01] Page 1 & 19

Re: Knights [21/01] Page 1 & 19

Re: Knights [21/01] Page 1 & 19

Re: Knights [21/01] Page 1 & 19

Re: Knights [21/01] Page 1 & 19

Re: Knights [21/01] Page 1 & 19

Re: Knights [21/01] Page 1 & 19

Re: Knights [21/01] Page 1 & 19

Re: Knights [21/01] Page 1 & 19

Re: Knights [21/01] Page 1 & 19

Re: Knights [21/01] Page 1 & 19

Re: Knights [21/01] Page 1 & 19

Re: Knights [21/01] Page 1 & 19

Re: Knights [21/01] Page 1 & 19

Re: Knights [21/01] Page 1 & 19

Re: Knights [21/01] Page 1 & 19

Re: Knights [21/01] Page 1 & 19

Re: Knights [21/01] Page 1 & 19

Re: Knights [21/01] Page 1 & 19

Who is online