Iron Butterfly wrote:Rodion you have obviously been able to "cherry pick" posts from discussions about Town theory. granted.
Not sure whether this is an attempt to discredit me, but obviously you are not forced to go with the "cherry picking". The whole thread is public and you have the freedom to see and argue outside of what I highlighted in either blue or red.
Iron Butterfly wrote:The only reason I am up for lynch by your crew is I put pressure on you. I will admit that it may have seemed like a small reason at the time but it was somthing that made me question your alignment.
After all the sellf Destructive drama from Zimmah when we applied pressure and then to claim such a powerful role with you only saying his role is curious...is more then curious to me.
The evidence against Zimmah is a hell of alot bigger.
Zimmah has claimed a role that is pretty much unkillable with its implied threat and game changing ramifications yet you dont even give it a second look?
I think I've been clear enough regarding my position. Perhaps if you had paid attention to everything I've said in D2 you would not be asking me this unnecessary question?
I am going to explain why my vote is on you and not on Zimmah with the same
criteria I've already mentioned several times in this very game: suspiciousness, ability to prove the claimed role and what town has to lose if we make a mistake.
Before we apply claims into the equation, I see you, Iron Butterfly, as suspicious for several reasons (that is why I voted you in the first place, remember?). The reasons could mainly be described as defying logic in your attempt to witch hunt and scaring town into sending their night actions as soon as possible after the mod only said that kills go on a first-come, first-served basis (which is something so concrete that I don't think even you can deny.
Before we apply claims into the equation, I think Zimmah's only suspicious act was how he handled Catnip on D1. The "drama" you mentioned is something I can easily relate to, because I've argued countless times with people that don't know what they are talking about and still vote you. I know how the feeling sucks and there are several ways of coping with it, one of them being the rage you've seen Zimmah display. If you had stopped to realize how wrong you have been in your arguments, Iron, perhaps you would understand why Zimmah is feeling that way.
Your claim can't be proved, Iron. Neither can Zimmah's, so here you are tied.
Considering you can either be lying or telling the truth, Iron, we either kill scum or lose a vanilla townie.
Considering Zimmah can either be lying or telling the truth, we either kill scum or lose a negotiator that can pretty much cost town the game (by the way, "Inside Man" had a negotiator and according to Safari this game resembles that movie, so the flavour fits)
In summary, while both Zimmah and you (Iron) can't prove the roles you've claimed, I consider Zimmah to be less suspicious. Moreover, if we are to pick wrongly, losing Zimmah will also endanger us considerably more.
It really shouldn't take a rocket scientist to understand why I'm not willing to change my votes.
