Moderator: Clan Directors
You didn't miss it! The drawing is at 6:00 EST today in live chat. The above is just a breakdown using the A400. Cheers.eddie2 wrote:gl all on the draw i missed it. and thank you djteflon for posting info.

can just groups with more clans 'delete' pts gained from encounter against the last positioned clan at the end of division?DJ Teflon wrote:Format Finalisation - Given that We Have 39 Clans
Phase OneClans in Divisions E to G will all automatically be awarded 1 point (and 9 game wins and losses) in view of equalising qualification possibilities for Phase Two vis-a-vis clans in larger Divisions playing one extra round.
- Four Groups of 6 Clans (Divisions A,B, C, D)
Three Groups of 5 (Divisions E, F, G)
I think it is 6 of one, half dozen of the other. No clan gets eliminated in the first phase anyway. The win/loss is just to get the order for Phase II. Also, there would be an EXTREMELY weak clan as clan #6 in those divisions as they would be almost at the bottom of the A400. Thus, adding a win seems like the fairest thing to do.benga wrote:can just groups with more clans 'delete' pts gained from encounter against the last positioned clan at the end of division?DJ Teflon wrote:Format Finalisation - Given that We Have 39 Clans
Phase OneClans in Divisions E to G will all automatically be awarded 1 point (and 9 game wins and losses) in view of equalising qualification possibilities for Phase Two vis-a-vis clans in larger Divisions playing one extra round.
- Four Groups of 6 Clans (Divisions A,B, C, D)
Three Groups of 5 (Divisions E, F, G)

chemefreak wrote:You didn't miss it! The drawing is at 6:00 EST today in live chat. The above is just a breakdown using the A400. Cheers.eddie2 wrote:gl all on the draw i missed it. and thank you djteflon for posting info.
We are hoping the same thing...I'm tired of getting smacked around by those damn Pirates!eddie2 wrote:fingers crossed aka dont get drawn with bofm![]()
![]()


I agree. with this solution clans in groups of 5 will be handicapped because everyone wil achieve the best results vs the last clan in any group.benga wrote:can just groups with more clans 'delete' pts gained from encounter against the last positioned clan at the end of division?DJ Teflon wrote:Format Finalisation - Given that We Have 39 Clans
Phase OneClans in Divisions E to G will all automatically be awarded 1 point (and 9 game wins and losses) in view of equalising qualification possibilities for Phase Two vis-a-vis clans in larger Divisions playing one extra round.
- Four Groups of 6 Clans (Divisions A,B, C, D)
Three Groups of 5 (Divisions E, F, G)

I agree with josko. I don't know that I have a solution, but that method isn't fair.josko.ri wrote:I agree. with this solution clans in groups of 5 will be handicapped because everyone wil achieve the best results vs the last clan in any group.benga wrote:can just groups with more clans 'delete' pts gained from encounter against the last positioned clan at the end of division?DJ Teflon wrote:Format Finalisation - Given that We Have 39 Clans
Phase OneClans in Divisions E to G will all automatically be awarded 1 point (and 9 game wins and losses) in view of equalising qualification possibilities for Phase Two vis-a-vis clans in larger Divisions playing one extra round.
- Four Groups of 6 Clans (Divisions A,B, C, D)
Three Groups of 5 (Divisions E, F, G)
Is your mom's name Division F?qwert wrote:division F look most heavy.
Dang it Chap! Now he is gonna spend 2 months trying to translate.......chapcrap wrote:Is your mom's name Division F?qwert wrote:division F look most heavy.

hmm, i dont understand meaning of your post- i put you on foe,and you can explane your self via PM.chapcrap wrote:Is your mom's name Division F?qwert wrote:division F look most heavy.
qwert wrote:hmm, i dont understand meaning of your post- i put you on foe,and you can explane your self via PM.chapcrap wrote:Is your mom's name Division F?qwert wrote:division F look most heavy.
We're sticking with the original 1 point adjustment, its too late to change after the draw.chapcrap wrote:I agree with josko. I don't know that I have a solution, but that method isn't fair.josko.ri wrote:I agree. with this solution clans in groups of 5 will be handicapped because everyone wil achieve the best results vs the last clan in any group.benga wrote:can just groups with more clans 'delete' pts gained from encounter against the last positioned clan at the end of division?DJ Teflon wrote:Format Finalisation - Given that We Have 39 Clans
Phase OneClans in Divisions E to G will all automatically be awarded 1 point (and 9 game wins and losses) in view of equalising qualification possibilities for Phase Two vis-a-vis clans in larger Divisions playing one extra round.
- Four Groups of 6 Clans (Divisions A,B, C, D)
Three Groups of 5 (Divisions E, F, G)
UEFA, FIFA and various other sport organizations usually use the rule mentioned by benga in the situations like this (IE - when best of all 2nd placed teams need to qualify) - disregard the results against last placed team in groups with extra team. I see no reason not to implement it in the future (if now is to late for CL4).DJ Teflon wrote:Anyway, its very tricky to arrange a system with an awkward number of clans, especially when you wish to get as many as possible involved. Feel free to post comments (or get your rep to post comments) in the cla discussion about next year's CL. One option in future may be that we cap numbers - for example, any clans joining after the 32nd aren't guaranteed a place until the 35th clan joins, etc ...

Do they?lordnex wrote:UEFA, FIFA and various other sport organizations usually use the rule mentioned by benga in the situations like this (IE - when best of all 2nd placed teams need to qualify) - disregard the results against last placed team in groups with extra team. I see no reason not to implement it in the future (if now is to late for CL4).DJ Teflon wrote:Anyway, its very tricky to arrange a system with an awkward number of clans, especially when you wish to get as many as possible involved. Feel free to post comments (or get your rep to post comments) in the cla discussion about next year's CL. One option in future may be that we cap numbers - for example, any clans joining after the 32nd aren't guaranteed a place until the 35th clan joins, etc ...
I think a system like that would be ideal. It would also make people sign up faster.DJ Teflon wrote:One option in future may be that we cap numbers - for example, any clans joining after the 32nd aren't guaranteed a place until the 35th clan joins, etc ...
or you could make it that the sign up rules are actually stuck to like the arguement we had over me asking for a few extra sign up days. which by the way since clans signed up on the day of the draw was 1 day after when i asked to contact yourselves so 4 days late. but am glad to see the clans not added till the draw took place are within the sign up ruleschapcrap wrote:I think a system like that would be ideal. It would also make people sign up faster.DJ Teflon wrote:One option in future may be that we cap numbers - for example, any clans joining after the 32nd aren't guaranteed a place until the 35th clan joins, etc ...
aka have been drawn with WARParticipants must be CLA-eligible members meaning they have completed at least one 40+ challenge and adhere to the 1 competitive clan rule.
There is no decision to be made, question of changing things at this point - WAR are in.hmsps wrote:There is no chance of us missing a turn never mind dropping out.
Eddie2 do you just go looking for things to stir things up/make trouble?
We would have finished our first clan war weeks ago but as the result was beyond doubt, the opposition seem to be dragging their heels by running the clock right down before they play turns or indeed missing turns.
I hope you guys make the right decision and keep us in
hmsps wrote:There is no chance of us missing a turn never mind dropping out.
Eddie2 do you just go looking for things to stir things up/make trouble?
We would have finished our first clan war weeks ago but as the result was beyond doubt, the opposition seem to be dragging their heels by running the clock right down before they play turns or indeed missing turns.
I hope you guys make the right decision and keep us in