So I decided to review the swifte case (for the record I also reviews the chap case but while I feel soemthing is a bit off about him...I can't pin point much for a case especially as inactive submarining does not seem like a legitimate reason anymore as he's reemerged and has been posting)...
Swifte wrote:Rodion wrote:I'll try to go ahead and get the ball rolling. I want to ask everyone a question. Consider the following list.
Players
1. Leitz
2. MoB Deadly
3. Rodion
4. jimfinn
5. shieldgenerator7
6. jonty125
7. dazza2008
8. trinicardinal
9. Swifte
10. drunkmonkey
11. BGtheBrain
12. Epitaph1
13. betiko
14. MeDeFe
15. chapcrap
16. strike wolf
1 - "Are you ok if we lynch the person that is right below you?" (for Strike Wolf, consider the first person on the list)
2 - "Why?"
1 - I would be torn.
2 - I dislike drunks but I like monkeys. Either way part of me would be happy and part sad. Nothing else tipping me one way or the other yet.
Swifte wrote:I agree that inactivity itself can be grounds for suspicion. However, I have just reviewed all players and all players in the game have posted within the last 48 hours. Obviously some more active than others, but far from deadbeats at this point. Dates are as of my own timezone I imagine.
[spoiler=Last posts by player]1. Leitz Tue, Nov. 8
2. MoB Deadly Tue, Nov. 8
3. Rodion Tue, Nov. 8
4. jimfinn Mon, Nov. 7
5. shieldgenerator7 Mon, Nov. 7
6. jonty125 Tue, Nov. 8
7. dazza2008 Tue, Nov. 8
8. trinicardinal Tue, Nov. 8
9. Swifte Tue, Nov. 8
10. drunkmonkey Tue, Nov. 8
11. BGtheBrain Mon, Nov. 7
12. Epitaph1 Tue, Nov. 8
13. betiko Tue, Nov. 8
14. MeDeFe Tue, Nov. 8
15. chapcrap Mon, Nov. 7
16. strike wolf Tue, Nov. 8[/spoiler]
Swifte wrote:betiko wrote:let s put the question the other way; out of the 16 who do we trust a little? to tell the truth, i think that rodion by asking this question is one of the guys i would trust the most... aparently you guys have played this a few times together so you know each other better.. this means that I don t trust SG7
unvote vote SG7
The logic in this betiko quote was the most strange to me. Asking a question about trust automatically makes Roidon trustworthy? SG7 making a joke about Roidon always seeming to be in the mob earns a vote and distrust? I just didn't follow this at all, and some above have said it could have been a diversion to get attention off of Roidon. It's not a strong case, just seems like the strongest we have to go on so far. This is just my summary of those events, others may of course have interpreted differently.
Swifte wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Just post who you want me to prod, I'll send out the prod's ASAP.
I'll run through and update my last posting list when i get home in an hour or so.
Swifte wrote:MoB Deadly wrote:strike wolf wrote:
Considering the amount of effort I've put into making cases against Bg and trini, I am a bit insulted right now.
Im sorry Strike Wolf, I DO appreciate your cases, you are one of the few that ARE contributing. I just dont agree with the cases enough to put a vote on them. I hate D1 so much
Swifte wrote:Updated Last post list - I've done my best to make this 100% accurate, please no hard feelings if I've made a slight mistake, but I did look very closely at each players posts. Bold added to the two players who we haven't heard from in 4 or more days. Dates based on my own time zone (Central US)
Players
1. Leitz - 2 days ago (Saturday)
2. MoB Deadly - today
3. Rodion - today
4. jimfinn - today
5. shieldgenerator7 - 4 days ago (Thursday)
6. jonty125 - today
7. dazza2008 - today
8. trinicardinal - today
9. Swifte - today
10. drunkmonkey - 1 day ago (Sunday)
11. BGtheBrain - today
12. Epitaph1 - 2 days ago (Saturday)
13. betiko - 2 days ago (Saturday)
14. MeDeFe - 2 days ago (Saturday)
15. chapcrap - 5 days ago (Wednesday)
16. strike wolf - today
So up to this point I don't see much to comment on besides that he has as been mentioned been very neutral. He's relied mostly on statistics and not gotten involved in cases. By itself it's not really much of a case as Andy took a similar role early on in the Futurama mafia but that does start to change after this post.
Swifte wrote:betiko wrote:omg, what s going on here lol!
I don t think the light blue and the post editing are real cases.
I have little experience in this, but is it a tell not to vote ever?
swifte s never voting nor getting really involved. I almost see him as another mod sumarizing player s activities..
no one said anything about my chapcrap case nor trini's..
We see lots of people FOSing strike but no one votes for him.
So is BG really a VT? i don t think there was that much pressure on him or anything to claim his role at that point.....
Dazza, I didn t get your vote problem?
-I don't see not voting yet as an issue. I value my vote and prefer not to throw it around lightly. So far I have not seen a case worth voting for immediately, and I think most people have agreed that there have not been any strong cases, primarily voting for pressuring which I think others have done plenty of without me bandwagoning. If I feel I need to vote to apply pressure, I would be willing to do that, but so far I just haven't felt it necessary, there's been enough of that going on to stir the pot. I have been following closely, and when the time comes (which is now pretty soon) I will state my case and will make my vote.
- I think that when a day stretches across about 20 pages it's important for someone to summarize the action from time to time, especially when things have gotten so off-topic that we've almost lost track of cases. I view this as a valuable contribution, and equally as important to the sniping back and forth others engage in. I feel this is one of my strengths as a player, a way I can contribute that others thus far have not, so I have taken on that role, and it is a role that requires being engaged in the game and understanding and processing the arguements that have been made, which is where i've directed more of my energy rather than trying to pile on every accussation.
Swifte wrote:I will go ahead and throw my two cents out there on everything since activity has slowed again a little. While I didn't initially find there to be much in strike's case against BG, the last 36 hours have been pretty revealing. Here's the reasons I submit my vote BG:
- His last several posts have the tone of someone who has given up, and just wants to get out of the game. I've seen this behavior plenty of times before from someone who's been busted.v
I could see you taking this view however...between what happened in your above post where you claimed to not buy into any of the current cases to when you posted this not much had changed. Only a few posted (none of which were BG) and nothing much seems to have changed in the case against BG (except for one vote). So the timing here appears suspect to me.
swifte wrote:- The VT claim is weak. I know people have said 'who cares about the color' - but if claiming to be townie is your last arguement, don't you go to the effort to make that claim as convincing as possible and use the right color blue? To me, it's a little thing, but it tips it to 51/49 odds of being false. I don't think the character selected matters at all.
The shade of blue argument is bs. Enough said.
swifte wrote:- Honestly, it doesn't seem like BG has shown an ability to contribute to any of the previous cases, mostly bandwagoning, and he was completely unable to defend himself against strike. If he can't make any solid arguements or refute anything, how can he contribute at all to the game, one way or the other?
All these things together add up to a relatively weaker player with a weak claim that could either be a mafia who has been busted or maybe really just a vanilla townie without much arguementative skill, and while it's not desireable to lynch a townie, I don't think BG would even be able to help the townie cause much if his claim does hold true.
I do think it's a bit unfair to say that he can't contribute in general. Maybe in this game this hasn't been his best effort and I know I've been his biggest critic in this game however he does have the potential to contribute and contribute well to the games he is in and will be a part of. So not really an argument to your guilt here just something I wanted to point out.
I guess my main point in this post is what I mentioned earlier. WHat changed in the half a day or so that made you change your mind about the BG case? Because I don't see anything.
I don't see anything in his next few comments that seem worth commenting as it would mostly involve just repeats of what I've said without anything that would actually add to the case.