Moderator: Cartographers

Natty has a very god point here. impassables and bridge crossing are so universal in so many maps I don't think you need to include them in your legends. That extra space with allow you to make your minimap bigger, which is a much more important aspect of your map.natty_dread wrote:I don't know if you really need the "passables" legend. Everyone knows by now that a line between two territories means they are connected, the same with bridges. You can keep the impassables legend if you want, although that is also borderline redundant...
Most importantly, by removing these redundant elements, you'll have more room for your minimap and you can make it larger. Then you can get rid of that mish-mash of lines and instead put the bonus area names on the bonus areas.
Top Score:2403natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
yes thise things are obvious i think, you probably also realize how and where you can attack and not.gimil wrote:Natty has a very god point here. impassables and bridge crossing are so universal in so many maps I don't think you need to include them in your legends. That extra space with allow you to make your minimap bigger, which is a much more important aspect of your map.natty_dread wrote:I don't know if you really need the "passables" legend. Everyone knows by now that a line between two territories means they are connected, the same with bridges. You can keep the impassables legend if you want, although that is also borderline redundant...
Most importantly, by removing these redundant elements, you'll have more room for your minimap and you can make it larger. Then you can get rid of that mish-mash of lines and instead put the bonus area names on the bonus areas.
thanks.natty_dread wrote:That looks much better.
frame had small lions with hearts, it was hard to see what it would imagine because it was so tiny I made the frame therefore more simpleTaCktiX wrote:I really liked the border you had around the continent listing (now minimap). Any chance of putting it back on? Or did others have major issues with it?
Yes the lions and hearts are national symbols, the Danish Coat of Arms have 3 blue lions and 9 red hearts.TaCktiX wrote:Is the lion with the heart a national symbol? I'm not that familiar with Denmark.
Also, the two territory connectors to Samsø look odd compared to the others. They're in a straight line where every other connector isn't, and though it has no rational basis makes me think that Samsø is optional when attacking from Horsens to Kalundborg. This could be fixed by scooting the Horsens/Samsø connector up to meet the middle of Samsø instead of its fat south.
Is the leopard with the heart on it, like the one you have here, a well-known symbol in Denmark? I know the coat of arms has a field of hearts behind the leopards, but not joined together like yours.Flapcake wrote:Yes the lions and hearts are national symbols, the Danish Coat of Arms have 3 blue lions and 9 red hearts.TaCktiX wrote:Is the lion with the heart a national symbol? I'm not that familiar with Denmark.
Also, the two territory connectors to Samsø look odd compared to the others. They're in a straight line where every other connector isn't, and though it has no rational basis makes me think that Samsø is optional when attacking from Horsens to Kalundborg. This could be fixed by scooting the Horsens/Samsø connector up to meet the middle of Samsø instead of its fat south.
I can see that the sail rute from Horsens go strait into samsø where the lines go from samsø to Kalundborg, i will move one of them so they dont look connected.


Hey Gillipig thanks for your comment, it is not a historical map, it is called Kingdom of Denmark as the country has carried that name for 1000 years, even if it is a queen whos rules. Right now it is Margaret ll and when Frederick 10 take over, we can switch her out. If it was a historic map then Christian 4 would be my favorite.Gillipig wrote:I like how the map looks and I like the idea of having a some danish king in the upper left. Like I said I like the idea of having some danish king not a queen. Denmark is an old country so there are plenty of kings to chose from and kings that not only were symbols but that actually ruled the country. If this was a map of Sweden I think the royalty in the upper left should be Gustav Vasa. And I'm thinking you should pick a king with similar importance to Denmark. Now I'm not very good at danish kings but I know that Kristian, Valdemar and Gorm were somewhat important kings. Margareta II is one of the least important head of states of Denmark because of her limited power. So I think you should pick someone else. The same thing applies to our current swedish king. It doesn't really matter that you've sat for 40 years if you don't rule the country! She also looks very much alike the British queen so there's risk of confusion.
Hi Tolke, thanks for your comment.tokle wrote:Is the leopard with the heart on it, like the one you have here, a well-known symbol in Denmark? I know the coat of arms has a field of hearts behind the leopards, but not joined together like yours.Flapcake wrote:Yes the lions and hearts are national symbols, the Danish Coat of Arms have 3 blue lions and 9 red hearts.TaCktiX wrote:Is the lion with the heart a national symbol? I'm not that familiar with Denmark.
Also, the two territory connectors to Samsø look odd compared to the others. They're in a straight line where every other connector isn't, and though it has no rational basis makes me think that Samsø is optional when attacking from Horsens to Kalundborg. This could be fixed by scooting the Horsens/Samsø connector up to meet the middle of Samsø instead of its fat south.
I can see that the sail rute from Horsens go strait into samsø where the lines go from samsø to Kalundborg, i will move one of them so they dont look connected.
I agree with having the current queen on this map, since it's a map of the current state and not a historical one. If you wanted to pick a king, I'm sure Knud the Great would be the most well-known internationally.
What!? No lengthy in-depth gameplay breakdown? Marshal you're slipping!MarshalNey wrote:I'm going to put this map up for review in the next bulletin. The gameplay looks reasonable to me, I'll see what the other CAs think. If there are no unaddressed concerns from the CAs and community in the next week or so, expect a stamp.
-- Marshal Ney
isaiah40 wrote:What!? No lengthy in-depth gameplay breakdown? Marshal you're slipping!MarshalNey wrote:I'm going to put this map up for review in the next bulletin. The gameplay looks reasonable to me, I'll see what the other CAs think. If there are no unaddressed concerns from the CAs and community in the next week or so, expect a stamp.
-- Marshal Ney
all the territories had the same blend / inner glow, I have adjusted a little on them separately, the inner glow has become more anonymous now.TaCktiX wrote:This isn't gameplay, but the shadow effect on the borders looks different depending on the continent color. This is most striking between the red Midt Jylland and the orange Sønder Jylland. I think it's by using the Screen blending mode, which switching to Normal and fudging with opacity should make them look similar across the board.
I know exacly how you feel. After looking at the map for countless hours and changing it countless times, there comes a point of brain freeze. A couple of quick things for you to check over while you get your brain out of neutral are...Flapcake wrote:Just to let you all know, im still alivei have just come to an point where im very satified with my map and cant come on any thing more to add
![]()
if there have to be any changes i need some feedback/comments, i guess my imagination or creativity skills are not that evolved at this stage
