If I were you, bro, I would be thankful that I had no PR. They are really annoying to add in if you ask me.dazza2008 wrote:I don't have a PR but there is something in the description I could do if I knew how to. I wish it was that its easy![]()
Moderator: Community Team
If I were you, bro, I would be thankful that I had no PR. They are really annoying to add in if you ask me.dazza2008 wrote:I don't have a PR but there is something in the description I could do if I knew how to. I wish it was that its easy![]()
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
I have and I don't have to act a certain way. Sorry for wasting time here.strike wolf wrote:I think I've about reached the limit for how much I can help you without forcing a soft claim. I'd ask commander and/or pancake for clarification on how the character should role play.

I am I have 1 in another game and its a pain in the titsMr. Squirrel wrote:If I were you, bro, I would be thankful that I had no PR. They are really annoying to add in if you ask me.dazza2008 wrote:I don't have a PR but there is something in the description I could do if I knew how to. I wish it was that its easy![]()

Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Well if I get mod-killed or replace you will know I am lying. I PM'd PCM and he said I don't have a certain way to act.strike wolf wrote:that sounds kind of like a lie considering a big part of this game is role play. In your defense commander did say that the role play wouldn't be strictly enforced but I believe he also said that people who were ignoring their role play would be replaced or modkilled or something.

Did you completely skim my response to tails? I said the difference between an inactive and an active submariner (lurker) was whether or not they respond by posting. Until they do post, I consider them an inactive. When ckyrias posted, he no longer was inactive. Since he has gone silent since then, he is now lurking. And that's scummier than being inactive.sensfan wrote:My reasoning for at first voting ckyrias was to get him to post. I wasnt thinking about lynching, but I worked, he posted.... and now hes gone again.
fos Safari for Tails explanation on the 29th page and his will to lynch a inactive who could be a townie
vote ckyrias for disappearing again! This isnt fun when you go away, unlike me!

And Boom goes the dynamite! Saf just dropped it on you!safariguy5 wrote:Did you completely skim my response to tails? I said the difference between an inactive and an active submariner (lurker) was whether or not they respond by posting. Until they do post, I consider them an inactive. When ckyrias posted, he no longer was inactive. Since he has gone silent since then, he is now lurking. And that's scummier than being inactive.sensfan wrote:My reasoning for at first voting ckyrias was to get him to post. I wasnt thinking about lynching, but I worked, he posted.... and now hes gone again.
fos Safari for Tails explanation on the 29th page and his will to lynch a inactive who could be a townie
vote ckyrias for disappearing again! This isnt fun when you go away, unlike me!
Why couldn't he had said 99?Metsfanmax wrote:I hereby proclaim that those of you who have chosen to unvote lawlrus may have acted too quickly, as the level of activity from nagerous does not warrant such an action! Be careful, or God may smite you for your actions. A famous philosopher once stated that he has five score minus one complications, but a female dog is not one such complication. It seems unfortunately that we have many.
Challenge Accepted: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m0miU3tiy4Ijonty125 wrote:Why couldn't he had said 99?Metsfanmax wrote:I hereby proclaim that those of you who have chosen to unvote lawlrus may have acted too quickly, as the level of activity from nagerous does not warrant such an action! Be careful, or God may smite you for your actions. A famous philosopher once stated that he has five score minus one complications, but a female dog is not one such complication. It seems unfortunately that we have many.
What we have many complications (like OVER 9000!) or many female dogs (like OVER 9000!) am I missing the point of this PR?
Give me a break sir, I am a working man and have a lot to re-read before I feel suitably caught up to contribute properly.Metsfanmax wrote:I hereby proclaim that those of you who have chosen to unvote lawlrus may have acted too quickly, as the level of activity from nagerous does not warrant such an action! Be careful, or God may smite you for your actions. A famous philosopher once stated that he has five score minus one complications, but a female dog is not one such complication. It seems unfortunately that we have many.

I never challenged you! Shame on you and your OVER 9000! youtube videos.chapcrap wrote:Challenge Accepted: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m0miU3tiy4Ijonty125 wrote:Why couldn't he had said 99?Metsfanmax wrote:I hereby proclaim that those of you who have chosen to unvote lawlrus may have acted too quickly, as the level of activity from nagerous does not warrant such an action! Be careful, or God may smite you for your actions. A famous philosopher once stated that he has five score minus one complications, but a female dog is not one such complication. It seems unfortunately that we have many.
What we have many complications (like OVER 9000!) or many female dogs (like OVER 9000!) am I missing the point of this PR?
Challenge accepted, your break has been granted. I also feel like it's kind of ridiculous for nag to read through the whole thread already. Give him a day or two and he'll be caught up, I'm sure.nagerous wrote:Give me a break sir, I am a working man and have a lot to re-read before I feel suitably caught up to contribute properly.Metsfanmax wrote:I hereby proclaim that those of you who have chosen to unvote lawlrus may have acted too quickly, as the level of activity from nagerous does not warrant such an action! Be careful, or God may smite you for your actions. A famous philosopher once stated that he has five score minus one complications, but a female dog is not one such complication. It seems unfortunately that we have many.
That was only my first video...and I did it to answer your question!!jonty125 wrote:I never challenged you! Shame on you and your OVER 9000! youtube videos.chapcrap wrote:Challenge Accepted: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m0miU3tiy4Ijonty125 wrote:Why couldn't he had said 99?Metsfanmax wrote:I hereby proclaim that those of you who have chosen to unvote lawlrus may have acted too quickly, as the level of activity from nagerous does not warrant such an action! Be careful, or God may smite you for your actions. A famous philosopher once stated that he has five score minus one complications, but a female dog is not one such complication. It seems unfortunately that we have many.
What we have many complications (like OVER 9000!) or many female dogs (like OVER 9000!) am I missing the point of this PR?
It was the only place I could fit my PR in! *OVER 9000! sighs*chapcrap wrote:Challenge accepted, your break has been granted. I also feel like it's kind of ridiculous for nag to read through the whole thread already. Give him a day or two and he'll be caught up, I'm sure.nagerous wrote:Give me a break sir, I am a working man and have a lot to re-read before I feel suitably caught up to contribute properly.Metsfanmax wrote:I hereby proclaim that those of you who have chosen to unvote lawlrus may have acted too quickly, as the level of activity from nagerous does not warrant such an action! Be careful, or God may smite you for your actions. A famous philosopher once stated that he has five score minus one complications, but a female dog is not one such complication. It seems unfortunately that we have many.That was only my first video...and I did it to answer your question!!jonty125 wrote:I never challenged you! Shame on you and your OVER 9000! youtube videos.chapcrap wrote:Challenge Accepted: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m0miU3tiy4Ijonty125 wrote:Why couldn't he had said 99?Metsfanmax wrote:I hereby proclaim that those of you who have chosen to unvote lawlrus may have acted too quickly, as the level of activity from nagerous does not warrant such an action! Be careful, or God may smite you for your actions. A famous philosopher once stated that he has five score minus one complications, but a female dog is not one such complication. It seems unfortunately that we have many.
What we have many complications (like OVER 9000!) or many female dogs (like OVER 9000!) am I missing the point of this PR?
Is that a freudian slip there sir?dazza2008 wrote:Well if I get mod-killed or replace you will know I am lying. I PM'd PCM and he said I don't have a certain way to act.strike wolf wrote:that sounds kind of like a lie considering a big part of this game is role play. In your defense commander did say that the role play wouldn't be strictly enforced but I believe he also said that people who were ignoring their role play would be replaced or modkilled or something.

Umm, no. Think about itnagerous wrote:Is that a freudian slip there sir?dazza2008 wrote:Well if I get mod-killed or replace you will know I am lying. I PM'd PCM and he said I don't have a certain way to act.strike wolf wrote:that sounds kind of like a lie considering a big part of this game is role play. In your defense commander did say that the role play wouldn't be strictly enforced but I believe he also said that people who were ignoring their role play would be replaced or modkilled or something.
Ok, I think there's a difference between role play and post restriction. Not following your post restriction can lead to a variety of punishments that generally mean either losing night actions or perhaps a modkill. Roleplaying I think is somewhat more optional, especially if there isn't a PR.nagerous wrote:Is that a freudian slip there sir?dazza2008 wrote:Well if I get mod-killed or replace you will know I am lying. I PM'd PCM and he said I don't have a certain way to act.strike wolf wrote:that sounds kind of like a lie considering a big part of this game is role play. In your defense commander did say that the role play wouldn't be strictly enforced but I believe he also said that people who were ignoring their role play would be replaced or modkilled or something.

Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.

So that's know all done and dusted (after OVER 9000! attempts) . Where on earth is ckyrais he pops up and then disappears he is lurkingdazza2008 wrote:I have no PR and I do not think there is a certain way to act. My meme is a pretty normal guy. Well a lot more clever than me but I could not role play that or I would be clever![]()
Sorry if I have wasted time here with this. I should have just asked the mod first and not asked here. Sorry
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
+1strike wolf wrote:Personally at this point I don't really care where he is. the fact remains is he is not here. A couple people have said he's been on line I believe one said they spotted him viewing this forum more than once. That goes along witth what I'm seeing as much as I can tell so I have no problem with this wagon.
Why exactly do we have to say that? Am I missing something here?chapcrap wrote:+1strike wolf wrote:Personally at this point I don't really care where he is. the fact remains is he is not here. A couple people have said he's been on line I believe one said they spotted him viewing this forum more than once. That goes along witth what I'm seeing as much as I can tell so I have no problem with this wagon.
I don't know if he has accepted the challenge to read the thread or not. However, I do know that he has been online and active in other areas of CC, so I feel the same as SW in this matter. If you feel the same, please respond with: 'Challenge Accepted'
I accept your challenge chap crap and I will thrash you in whatever it is by OVER 9000!slowreactor wrote:Why exactly do we have to say that? Am I missing something here?chapcrap wrote:+1strike wolf wrote:Personally at this point I don't really care where he is. the fact remains is he is not here. A couple people have said he's been on line I believe one said they spotted him viewing this forum more than once. That goes along witth what I'm seeing as much as I can tell so I have no problem with this wagon.
I don't know if he has accepted the challenge to read the thread or not. However, I do know that he has been online and active in other areas of CC, so I feel the same as SW in this matter. If you feel the same, please respond with: 'Challenge Accepted'