[Official] Futurama Mafia Town Wins! PCM wins Premium

[safariguy5]

QOTD:
Greeting Card: Come, Comrade Bender! We must take to the streets!
Bender: Um, is this the boring, peaceful kind of taking to the streets?
Greeting Card: No! The kind with looting and maybe starting a few fires!
Bender: Yes! In your face, Gandhi!

Vote Count

Gilligan(1)- drunk,
freezie(4)- pcm, Andy, strike, jonty
Andy(1)- freezie
Com9(1)- /


With 15 alive, it takes 8 to lynch.

Deadline in 4 days.

[kwanton]

went to AC for the weekend. On my phone no time to post. This applies to my other games too if someone can spread the word for me. Be back tomm or wed. Thnx.

[Metsfanmax]

I don't think any of the cases so far are strong enough for an actual lynch, but I'd do what / said lynch someone just to break the gridlock if we have to. There are still enough people in the game that we can afford to go after a weak scum case.

[strike wolf]

So...I don't really have anything new to say...anyone want to follow through on /'s Suggestion and actually contribute more to the game?

[drunkmonkey]

I'm still here. I said my piece about Gilligan, no one thought it was strong enough, and I haven't read anything strong enough to change my vote. Sure would be nice to hear from the ~50% of players who aren't participating. Maybe we could get something new going.

[safariguy5]

QOTD:
Fry: They're like sex, except I'm having it!

Vote Count

Gilligan(1)- drunk,
freezie(4)- pcm, Andy, strike, jonty
Andy(1)- freezie
Com9(1)- /


With 15 alive, it takes 8 to lynch.

Deadline in 3 days.

Any requests for prods?

[AndyDufresne]

I think I've said and done all I can for this round.


--Andy

[jonty125]

I'm still here. I said my piece about Gilligan, no one thought it was strong enough, and I haven't read anything strong enough to change my vote. Sure would be nice to hear from the ~50% of players who aren't participating. Maybe we could get something new going.

Same. My #1 case for a lynch is Gil but freezie is my #2 and I'd rather see a lynch than a no lynch.

[Metsfanmax]

I'm still here. I said my piece about Gilligan, no one thought it was strong enough, and I haven't read anything strong enough to change my vote. Sure would be nice to hear from the ~50% of players who aren't participating. Maybe we could get something new going.

Same. My #1 case for a lynch is Gil but freezie is my #2 and I'd rather see a lynch than a no lynch.

Well, time is running out and we need to get something done. I really don't like either of these cases but I side with jonty on strategy here.

Vote freezie

[strike wolf]

QOTD:
Fry: They're like sex, except I'm having it!

Vote Count

Gilligan(1)- drunk,
freezie(4)- pcm, Andy, strike, jonty
Andy(1)- freezie
Com9(1)- /


With 15 alive, it takes 8 to lynch.

Deadline in 3 days.

Any requests for prods?

I would say prod /, tails, haggis, gilligan, naxus and anyone currently not voting.

[jonty125]

Freezie your at L-2 now would be a good time to claim.

[safariguy5]

QOTD:
Free Waterfall Jr.: Pssh! You can't own property, man!
Professor Farnsworth: I can, but that's because I'm not a penniless hippie!

Vote Count

Gilligan(1)- drunk
freezie(5)- pcm, Andy, strike, jonty, Mets
Andy(1)- freezie
Com9(1)- /


With 15 alive, it takes 8 to lynch.

Deadline in 2 days.

Prodding tails, haggis, gilligan and naxus

[Gilligan]

I've been following...I've just had nothing to add. I've said all I have to say.

But my general gameplay is if we have a mislynch, use it...I have no issue lynching freezie.

[Metsfanmax]

I've been following...I've just had nothing to add. I've said all I have to say.

But my general gameplay is if we have a mislynch, use it...I have no issue lynching freezie.

Then add your vote to the mix.

[Gilligan]

I've been following...I've just had nothing to add. I've said all I have to say.

But my general gameplay is if we have a mislynch, use it...I have no issue lynching freezie.

Then add your vote to the mix.

While we still have 2 days, I figure a claim wouldn't be a bad idea.

[TA1LGUNN3R]

It seems / is yet again avoiding action, which he then calls for.

So immediately after Commander adds to the dialogue against freezie and freezie has accumulated a few votes by now, / jumps on Commie's mistake. I believe it just to be a mistake rather than skimming. So he mixed up a little bit. It happens. Maybe he hadn't read those pages in a little while and was just going off the most recent posts. So, at least two possibilities here that come to mind:

1. He's defending freezie (notice how he avoids commenting on Andy v. freezie at the end) however I'm too lazy atm to reference anything he may have said too freezie or Andy earlier.

2. He's wanting to avoid jumping on the freezie wagon and appear like's he's joining a BW as scum for future defense (possible SK maneuver).

FOS to the slash man.

-Tails

So he either missed that or chose to ignore it, because he still has nothing to add regarding any of the cases so far but wants someone to provide him with one:

Sorry, I was missing for about four days due to internet issues.

Well, this doesn't look good at all, less than seven total voters with 8 to lynch, half of the voted being the voters themselves...
This makes me suspicious, it sometimes benefits scum to not be on a case, if it's a scum mate it can prolong the mate's life, if it's town despite losing a kill opportunity it can deter some suspicion in the long run.

I think it's absolutely essential to take some action at this point if we don't want to end up in another deadlock tomorrow or need to make an investigative role claim (assuming they are lucky)
I would like to hear from the nonvoting majority on if they support current cases, if they have anything to add, cases of their own, you know....*cough* what you were already supposed to be doing?

I'm still sticking to my guns on Freezie. He's been jumping at every chance he can to bring the discussion off of himself and I really just don't feel that he's responded well to the cases presented on him.

At this point I'm inclined to agree, with the added caveat that I believe / to be suspicious as well. Alone, I wasn't too convinced with the freezie case, but with /'s quiet defense of freezie I'm leaning towards scum:

Do not mistake acknowledging a new event as "derailing" current cases, suspicion is being cast all around, there is no point in ignoring something suspect.
Also, if you are going to say as much, could you elaborate on why the other case is a "much more valid case", from what I have seen you have brought up two points of your opinion against freezie (and no, I am not disputing others cases against freezie, just your stated reasoning in particular)

you brought up two points
1. for FOSing confirmed townie giligan (as we have concluded a mistake on your part)
2. Tunneling andy, whom he has so far made one post on, unless you are for some reason counting joke votes?

I will vote freezie if I don't believe his claim. He is L-2, as stated previously by someone.

-Tails

[strike wolf]

actually he's at L-3 unless I missed a vote.

[Metsfanmax]

The VC said L-3, which is why I was prodding Gilligan to put his vote where his mouth is.

[freezie]

Freezie your at L-2 now would be a good time to claim.

For anyone who followed Pokemon Mafia, go back on day 1 and watch Nagerous' response to my ''willing to claim''

He was right. I wanted to do this differently this time since people were going to lynch me for voting someone and ''lynching the miller is better than lynching the -insert anything else here-. Nagerous DID catch my ''claim''.

Bubblegum Tate, town miller. I know nothing else.

[Gilligan]

I don't know anything about the show. Does the character match up with the role?

[strike wolf]

I don't buy it. I'm not gonna get into how minor the character is as my own isn't a huge character but I don't think miller fits the character (bubblegum was kind of an anti town role in his first appearance as the leader of the globe trotters but it was mostly a comical battle (a war of basketball) but was a clear good guy if anything in the show. Usually showing up to provide cameo appearances and help tje professor with dreaded mathematical equations).

[Gilligan]

I don't buy it. I'm not gonna get into how minor the character is as my own isn't a huge character but I don't think miller fits the character (bubblegum was kind of an anti town role in his first appearance as the leader of the globe trotters but it was mostly a comical battle (a war of basketball) but was a clear good guy if anything in the show. Usually showing up to provide cameo appearances and help tje professor with dreaded mathematical equations).

I'll take your word for it.

vote freezie

L-2.

[freezie]

I don't buy it. I'm not gonna get into how minor the character is as my own isn't a huge character but I don't think miller fits the character (bubblegum was kind of an anti town role in his first appearance as the leader of the globe trotters but it was mostly a comical battle (a war of basketball) but was a clear good guy if anything in the show. Usually showing up to provide cameo appearances and help tje professor with dreaded mathematical equations).

So basicly my character appear anti town but is really on the good side.

I am a miller. Which is exactly that. So I must be lying.

? uhm

[naxus]

Reading post something in the morning

[TA1LGUNN3R]

2. Mafia do have fakeclaims, and they are decent ones. The scope of the game will encompass all seasons.

Although would freezie claim miller again?? That didn't work out so well last time IIRC. Hmm....

I guess I'll just stick to the policy of not believing a miller claim.

vote freezie

-Tails