strike wolf wrote:I'm saying vote pattern wise you haven't really strayed too far from the course. I think you know which two important details that you I was referring to about the case.
Yes, I'm fully aware of that, but I'm not completely sure how you came to a conclusion that I'm a 4th most likely scum (That's what I'm inferring from your list). Just due to my voting patterns (or lack thereof) on Day 2 when I've been quite inactive really doesn't scream "Oh, he's a very likely scum."
strike wolf wrote:I'm saying vote pattern wise you haven't really strayed too far from the course. I think you know which two important details that you I was referring to about the case.
Yes, I'm fully aware of that, but I'm not completely sure how you came to a conclusion that I'm a 4th most likely scum (That's what I'm inferring from your list). Just due to my voting patterns (or lack thereof) on Day 2 when I've been quite inactive really doesn't scream "Oh, he's a very likely scum."
I'm not saying you are that list was just as I thought of them (you might want to look that I included two dead townies that if I was going by most likely scum would be 8 and 9 on the list :S )
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
strike wolf wrote:I'm not saying you are that list was just as I thought of them (you might want to look that I included two dead townies that if I was going by most likely scum would be 8 and 9 on the list :S )
I've noticed that and it wasn't full either, but to be completely honest, this isn't the 1st time I'm not completely sure I understand your logic, so I thought I might as well ask (and should I be wrong, I'd be corrected - which was true).
strike wolf wrote:I'm not saying you are that list was just as I thought of them (you might want to look that I included two dead townies that if I was going by most likely scum would be 8 and 9 on the list :S )
I've noticed that and it wasn't full either, but to be completely honest, this isn't the 1st time I'm not completely sure I understand your logic, so I thought I might as well ask (and should I be wrong, I'd be corrected - which was true).
I'm starting to get used to this reaction when I make a case...
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
strike wolf wrote: I'm starting to get used to this reaction when I make a case...
Well, some of your cases are very well thought out and they are worthy of attention, but there have also been games where I really don't understand a thing (and that miscommunication has already proved to be somewhat deadly).
strike wolf wrote: I'm starting to get used to this reaction when I make a case...
Well, some of your cases are very well thought out and they are worthy of attention, but there have also been games where I really don't understand a thing (and that miscommunication has already proved to be somewhat deadly).
Like the time you killed the town governor in Team CC Mafia which also meant I died?
War doesn't determine who's right; it determines who's left.
QOTD: Bender (to Fry and the Professor; after Bender receives a suitcase from a stranger in the middle of the ocean): Hey, guess what you're accessories to.
QOTD: [Fry is presented with an egg-sized pill which will allow him to withstand the pressure underwater.] Fry: Are you crazy? I can't swallow that. Professor Farnsworth Well, then good news! It's a suppository.
I'm still sticking to my guns on Freezie. He's been jumping at every chance he can to bring the discussion off of himself and I really just don't feel that he's responded well to the cases presented on him.
pancakemix wrote:I'm still sticking to my guns on Freezie. He's been jumping at every chance he can to bring the discussion off of himself and I really just don't feel that he's responded well to the cases presented on him.
So, me voting fircoal was a chance to bring discussion off myself? I had no freaking votes at that point. But, I acheived what I wanted, discussion started a lot more. I answered to what I could answer.
pancakemix wrote:I'm still sticking to my guns on Freezie. He's been jumping at every chance he can to bring the discussion off of himself and I really just don't feel that he's responded well to the cases presented on him.
So, me voting fircoal was a chance to bring discussion off myself? I had no freaking votes at that point. But, I acheived what I wanted, discussion started a lot more. I answered to what I could answer.
There doesn't need to be a sizable number of votes against someone for the court of popular opinion to be rapidly shifting against them. Day 1 is all about latching onto minor slips and increasing the pressure so that if we really did uncover scum, their case falls apart.
pancakemix wrote:I'm still sticking to my guns on Freezie. He's been jumping at every chance he can to bring the discussion off of himself and I really just don't feel that he's responded well to the cases presented on him.
So, me voting fircoal was a chance to bring discussion off myself? I had no freaking votes at that point. But, I acheived what I wanted, discussion started a lot more. I answered to what I could answer.
There doesn't need to be a sizable number of votes against someone for the court of popular opinion to be rapidly shifting against them. Day 1 is all about latching onto minor slips and increasing the pressure so that if we really did uncover scum, their case falls apart.
You know, skimming a post happens...but skimming the game day is....whoa. We're on day 2, btw.
pancakemix wrote:I'm still sticking to my guns on Freezie. He's been jumping at every chance he can to bring the discussion off of himself and I really just don't feel that he's responded well to the cases presented on him.
So, me voting fircoal was a chance to bring discussion off myself? I had no freaking votes at that point. But, I acheived what I wanted, discussion started a lot more. I answered to what I could answer.
There doesn't need to be a sizable number of votes against someone for the court of popular opinion to be rapidly shifting against them. Day 1 is all about latching onto minor slips and increasing the pressure so that if we really did uncover scum, their case falls apart.
You know, skimming a post happens...but skimming the game day is....whoa. We're on day 2, btw.
My bad. I just got added to the memebase mafia and am not used to playing multiple games at once.
I don't think it was so much the fircoal thing to dodge a defense as much as it's been your actions since. Mostly that it's taken a bit of prodding to get you to address specific arguments against you on more than one occasion.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
QOTD: Don-Bot: Alright, let's mafia things up a bit. Joey, burn down the ship. Clamps, burn down the crew. Bender: Uh, Donnie, baby. Youse guys skedaddle. Let me handle the doity wok. Don-bot: Blotto, I like your style, and your latest accent.
I've got my concerns about a number of people---Gilligan, Jonty, Kwanton, Strike Wolf to name a few, but I haven't formulated any strong cases in my own mind against any of them or others. I think I'm going to stick with my Freezie analysis and vote for the time being, though we still have 5 days.
AndyDufresne wrote:I've got my concerns about a number of people---Gilligan, Jonty, Kwanton, Strike Wolf to name a few, but I haven't formulated any strong cases in my own mind against any of them or others. I think I'm going to stick with my Freezie analysis and vote for the time being, though we still have 5 days.
--Andy
5 days is almost no time at all, given the glacial pace this game is moving at the last few days.
strike wolf wrote:I don't think it was so much the fircoal thing to dodge a defense as much as it's been your actions since. Mostly that it's taken a bit of prodding to get you to address specific arguments against you on more than one occasion.
I can remember ONE post I missed, and I answered immediatly. Other than that, like I said to Andy ( twice ) yes I have been absent for a week. In all my games.
AndyDufresne wrote:I've got my concerns about a number of people---Gilligan, Jonty, Kwanton, Strike Wolf to name a few, but I haven't formulated any strong cases in my own mind against any of them or others. I think I'm going to stick with my Freezie analysis and vote for the time being, though we still have 5 days.
--Andy
May I ask what makes me appear scummy.
War doesn't determine who's right; it determines who's left.
strike wolf wrote:I don't think it was so much the fircoal thing to dodge a defense as much as it's been your actions since. Mostly that it's taken a bit of prodding to get you to address specific arguments against you on more than one occasion.
I can remember ONE post I missed, and I answered immediatly. Other than that, like I said to Andy ( twice ) yes I have been absent for a week. In all my games.
It took more than one prodding to get you to answer that defense and in the meantime you were posting other stuff.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
AndyDufresne wrote:I've got my concerns about a number of people---Gilligan, Jonty, Kwanton, Strike Wolf to name a few, but I haven't formulated any strong cases in my own mind against any of them or others. I think I'm going to stick with my Freezie analysis and vote for the time being, though we still have 5 days.
--Andy
May I ask what makes me appear scummy.
You seemed to be quick to vote anyone moving for any reason.
Sorry, I was missing for about four days due to internet issues.
Well, this doesn't look good at all, less than seven total voters with 8 to lynch, half of the voted being the voters themselves... This makes me suspicious, it sometimes benefits scum to not be on a case, if it's a scum mate it can prolong the mate's life, if it's town despite losing a kill opportunity it can deter some suspicion in the long run.
I think it's absolutely essential to take some action at this point if we don't want to end up in another deadlock tomorrow or need to make an investigative role claim (assuming they are lucky) I would like to hear from the nonvoting majority on if they support current cases, if they have anything to add, cases of their own, you know....*cough* what you were already supposed to be doing?
)
